AOL update
04-30-2013, 02:27 PM
#801
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
The MOU is nothing more than a written agreement to a process that becomes Legally binding when, and only when, the POR is approved. At that point ALL previous CBAs, TA, agreements,etc,etc, become NULL and VOID!!
It implies more than ONE pilot SL at USA.. Why the separate min block hr, protections for east/west/AA until JCBA??
It implies more than ONE pilot SL at USA.. Why the separate min block hr, protections for east/west/AA until JCBA??
04-30-2013, 02:29 PM
#802
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
You have never understood what Silver said. She told you you needed a legitimate union purpose to change the Nic. Why do you guys forget that part?
04-30-2013, 02:30 PM
#803
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Posts: 392
Indeed, US Airways understands that the West Pilot Class will claim a right to be represented separately in the McCaskill-Bond process by counsel of their choice – a position which US Airways believes to be supported by the relevant legal authority.
04-30-2013, 02:45 PM
#804
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
The MOU was negotiated by OUR union USAPA. It was jointly ratified, by a 98% west vote I may add. This would satisfy the requirements of having "a legitimate union purpose"?? The west ratified the MOU, and nowhere in the MOU is the nic mentioned, or even implied...A JCBA has many sections...Can you please make reference to the section in the MOU that covers the east/west SL ?? You will not find it. Why? Because the MOU is NOT a JCBA..
04-30-2013, 02:47 PM
#805
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
04-30-2013, 02:52 PM
#806
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
The west ratified the MOU, and nowhere in the MOU is the nic mentioned, or even implied...
A JCBA has many sections...Can you please make reference to the section in the MOU that covers the east/west SL ??
You will not find it. Why? Because the MOU is NOT a JCBA..
04-30-2013, 02:56 PM
#808
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Posts: 392
No, I saw that part. I'm not sure why you are referencing it, but I'll take a wild guess that you think it means something important beyond what it actually says. What it says is rather obvious... that USAPA's position on seniority integration has the potential to affect the West pilot group "one way or the other". (i.e. positively or negatively). About the most neutral and obvious thing someone could possibly say about the situation.
It does NOT say that USAPA's position on seniority integration is an automatic breach of DFR, which appears to be what you are implying.
It does NOT say that USAPA's position on seniority integration is an automatic breach of DFR, which appears to be what you are implying.
04-30-2013, 03:04 PM
#810
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
No, I saw that part. I'm not sure why you are referencing it, but I'll take a wild guess that you think it means something important beyond what it actually says. What it says is rather obvious... that USAPA's position on seniority integration has the potential to affect the West pilot group "one way or the other". (i.e. positively or negatively). About the most neutral and obvious thing someone could possibly say about the situation.
It does NOT say that USAPA's position on seniority integration is an automatic breach of DFR, which appears to be what you are implying.
It does NOT say that USAPA's position on seniority integration is an automatic breach of DFR, which appears to be what you are implying.
That is true even if the West Pilots are allowed to advocate for the Nicolau Award seniority list, because the US Airways’ pilots would still be asserting two conflicting positions.”
Last edited by cactiboss; 04-30-2013 at 03:19 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
