Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2013, 06:57 PM
  #731  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
You think the APA will act based on your post ?

Yes, I'm sure they're scheduling a meeting first thing in the morning.
Yeah it's my post that is designed to influence the Apa, not the lawsuit I gave you a link to.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:02 PM
  #732  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by crzipilot
Think the 9th also said, can't rule on a bargaining position. Come to us with finalized work, and show us how you are harmed by the final document. THEN we can rule. As they don't work in assumptions or what the West THINKS will happen. As one judge stated, Just because they NIC isn't used, doesn't automatically make a DFR......as whatever is the end result MAY not harm the west, without knowing the end game, can't rule.....Not Ripe......

Have a feeling your gonna hear those words again.....
Well the 9th made a ruling based on the belief the union and company would negotiate a new seniority list, ratify it in a contract then the west could sue. The Mou now removes that "negotiation", It can never happen now. Go listen to Kirby, at por there is no more east/west and technically we are allowed to fly each others aircraft. See the difference?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:11 PM
  #733  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Well the 9th made a ruling based on the belief the union and company would negotiate a new seniority list, ratify it in a contract then the west could sue. The Mou now removes that "negotiation", It can never happen now. Go listen to Kirby, at por there is no more east/west and technically we are allowed to fly each others aircraft. See the difference?
Sharing equipment was not allowed under the current TA.. At POR the restrictions elapse, along with everything else under THAT agreement. East/west share a common ops. certificate. All ac are on that certificate therefore nothing inhibits the Co. From mixing ac..I bet you a quarter that crews will not be mixed!!
Sorry getting tired of repeating myself..So I cut and pasted from another post...
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:16 PM
  #734  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Well the 9th made a ruling based on the belief the union and company would negotiate a new seniority list, ratify it in a contract then the west could sue. The Mou now removes that "negotiation", It can never happen now. Go listen to Kirby, at por there is no more east/west and technically we are allowed to fly each others aircraft. See the difference?
...Because the NEW process will now be conducted according to McBond protocols..See MOU sec 10.h...
I thought so said seniority could NOT be negotiated??
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:17 PM
  #735  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
Sharing equipment was not allowed under the current TA.. At POR the restrictions elapse, along with everything else under THAT agreement. East/west share a common ops. certificate. All ac are on that certificate therefore nothing inhibits the Co. From mixing ac..I bet you a quarter that crews will not be mixed!!
Sorry getting tired of repeating myself..So I cut and pasted from another post...
"Sharing equipment" is not the point, the point is the single agreement required to implement the Nicolau is in place, usapa made clear the mou did not affect the west rights to the Nic, so what is usapa's legitimate purpose to not only not implement the Nic but propose a seniority list that benefits the east pilots at the expense of the west?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:21 PM
  #736  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
...Because the NEW process will now be conducted according to McBond protocols..See MOU sec 10.h...
I thought so said seniority could NOT be negotiated??
You are confusing 2 mergers my man, the us/Awa merger was in 2005, years before MB came about. 10h only speaks of usairways/aa pilots. FYI, MB specifically prohibits its application to mergers prior to MB being implemented.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:25 PM
  #737  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
"Sharing equipment" is not the point, the point is the single agreement required to implement the Nicolau is in place, usapa made clear the mou did not affect the west rights to the Nic, so what is usapa's legitimate purpose to not only not implement the Nic but propose a seniority list that benefits the east pilots at the expense of the west?
Because nothing in the MOU will affect the "LISTS" currently in effect at LCC..
h. US Airways agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a basis for
changing the seniority lists currently in effect at US Airways other than through the process set forth in
this Paragraph 10.

LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:28 PM
  #738  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
You are confusing 2 mergers my man, the us/Awa merger was in 2005, years before MB came about. 10h only speaks of usairways/aa pilots. FYI, MB specifically prohibits its application to mergers prior to MB being implemented.
That merger was NEVER CONSUMATED..Therefore the NEW MERGER requires NEW PROTOCOLS..Can you repeat after me...L E G I T I M A T E U N I O N P U R P O S E....
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:41 PM
  #739  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
Because nothing in the MOU will affect the "LISTS" currently in effect at LCC..
h. US Airways agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a basis for
changing the seniority lists currently in effect at US Airways other than through the process set forth in
this Paragraph 10.

have you read the filing? We claim the TA portion that mandates the Nic is still in force. The mou specifies which sections of the mou supersedes the TA, and the Nic. Is not one.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 07:43 PM
  #740  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
Because nothing in the MOU will affect the "LISTS" currently in effect at LCC..
h. US Airways agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a basis for
changing the seniority lists currently in effect at US Airways other than through the process set forth in
this Paragraph 10.

Read the filing, it addresses that. The mou is what makes our case "ripe", we can now have a court look at the merits.
cactiboss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices