Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2013, 09:37 PM
  #491  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
If usapa goes away before sli is done does apa inherit the Nic.?
The Nic lives in the TA and it looks to me as if the TA will be dead before the APA assumes responsibility:

"4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment
for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in
Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand,
however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except
for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA
shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and
such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially
inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising thereunder.
Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior
collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising
thereunder.
"

What if USAPA doesn't try to change the Nicolau award, but instead just presents separate east and west lists to the process?

Last edited by R57 relay; 03-13-2013 at 09:54 PM.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:40 PM
  #492  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
What windfall does he get???
He gets much greater advancement vs. standalone with much greater opportunity. At the expense of east pilots. It's as clear as it can be.

I think that USAPA's DOH scheme, at least as Seham presented it, did the same thing to the west. It did have some protections for the west where the Nic had none.

Last edited by R57 relay; 03-13-2013 at 09:52 PM.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 09:43 PM
  #493  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
I can tell you with a straight face that we will do whatever it takes to take the east pilots out, we only care about that. We will vote/sue whatever we think will give us an advantage.
But when east pilots used the separate ops provision of the TA, we were lying, cheating scum.

Not sure how much integrity I can handle.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:15 PM
  #494  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay

MOU 10h:

"h. US Airways agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a basis for
changing the seniority lists currently in effect at US Airways other than through the process set forth in
this Paragraph 10."
And this is why the company is a named defendant. Why the outrage?usapa says this is a "merit less" suit so you got nothing to worry about. Save it for the suit that drops at por, that one will upset you for sure.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:47 PM
  #495  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
The Nic lives in the TA and it looks to me as if the TA will be dead before the APA assumes responsibility:

"4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment
for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in
Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand,
however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except
for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA
shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and
such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially
inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising thereunder.
Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior
collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising
thereunder.
"

What if USAPA doesn't try to change the Nicolau award, but instead just presents separate east and west lists to the process?
We have a contract at por, anything that is presented that is not the Nic must have a LUP.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:52 PM
  #496  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
There you go altering reality to perceive a fantacious result. I think they call this INSANITY...How is the nic the LCC pilot list???
it's in your contract as modified by the TA
How did IT come to pass?
we went to binding arbitration and it was placed in your contract as required by the TA

And how would the APA shield itself from an east DFR suit if it accepts something that never was??
what never was was a doh list, there is a list accepted and placed in your contract called the Nicolau.
The SLI protocols are clearly specified in the MOU...How do you propose to obtain an injunction against something that YOU overwhelmingly ratified?? Your case would require "merit", something that IT clearly lacks..
Well that is for a judge to decide isn't it.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-13-2013, 10:56 PM
  #497  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
We have a contract at por, anything that is presented that is not the Nic must have a LUP.
Why because the voices in your head tell you so? Cant wait to hear the judges argument when he tells you to **** and leave his court room with your pathetic claim...You guys trully are pathetic...Talk about far reaching..
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 12:08 AM
  #498  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew
Why because the voices in your head tell you so? Cant wait to hear the judges argument when he tells you to **** and leave his court room with your pathetic claim...You guys trully are pathetic...Talk about far reaching..
Didn't silver say you needed an LUP? She also said the company must ensure you have an LUP. So in fact it's not the voice in my head but a federal judges voice that says you need an LUP. Now that a you voted in a contract, what is your LUP to discard the Nicolau ?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 01:47 AM
  #499  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
He gets much greater advancement vs. standalone with much greater opportunity. At the expense of east pilots. It's as clear as it can be.

I think that USAPA's DOH scheme, at least as Seham presented it, did the same thing to the west. It did have some protections for the west where the Nic had none.
Ok lets just be honest here for a moment shall we. So you statement was he gets much greater advancement vs a stand alone. Ok so the very same can be said of that whole merger. The east was dead prior and since has been given new life at the expense of an entire pilot group.

This thing will be over before it starts simply due to the fact that the new company is not going to go on as before nor will the DOJ allow it to merge under those conditions. The company is not going to let itself be sued and the APA will not allow themselves to be held up for years while a court decides that an arbitration is an arbitration. Douglas will finally be forced to act and based on the companies letter to the NMB they know the only out is force the the east into submission and now they have the numbers with the APA to do it.

I am sick of this whole mess and its an embarrassment to even tell people that I work for this outfit. There was an agreement and binding is binding period end of story.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 03-14-2013, 02:12 AM
  #500  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Pst...Cacti, just because you repeat the same $hit all the time, doesn't make it fact..Please define "legitimate union purpose"....and not YOUR version.
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices