AOL update
#491
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
The Nic lives in the TA and it looks to me as if the TA will be dead before the APA assumes responsibility:
"4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment
for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in
Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand,
however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except
for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA
shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and
such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially
inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising thereunder.
Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior
collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising
thereunder."
What if USAPA doesn't try to change the Nicolau award, but instead just presents separate east and west lists to the process?
"4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment
for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in
Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand,
however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except
for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA
shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and
such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially
inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising thereunder.
Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior
collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising
thereunder."
What if USAPA doesn't try to change the Nicolau award, but instead just presents separate east and west lists to the process?
Last edited by R57 relay; 03-13-2013 at 09:54 PM.
#492
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
He gets much greater advancement vs. standalone with much greater opportunity. At the expense of east pilots. It's as clear as it can be.
I think that USAPA's DOH scheme, at least as Seham presented it, did the same thing to the west. It did have some protections for the west where the Nic had none.
I think that USAPA's DOH scheme, at least as Seham presented it, did the same thing to the west. It did have some protections for the west where the Nic had none.
Last edited by R57 relay; 03-13-2013 at 09:52 PM.
#493
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Not sure how much integrity I can handle.
#494
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
And this is why the company is a named defendant. Why the outrage?usapa says this is a "merit less" suit so you got nothing to worry about. Save it for the suit that drops at por, that one will upset you for sure.
#495
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
The Nic lives in the TA and it looks to me as if the TA will be dead before the APA assumes responsibility:
"4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment
for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in
Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand,
however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except
for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA
shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and
such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially
inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising thereunder.
Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior
collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising
thereunder."
What if USAPA doesn't try to change the Nicolau award, but instead just presents separate east and west lists to the process?
"4. It is the intent of the Parties that, as of the Effective Date, the terms and conditions of employment
for pilots employed by New American Airlines and US Airways will be set by the MTA (as defined in
Paragraph 1(a)) and in accordance with the process specified herein. The Parties further understand,
however, that it will take some period of time for those terms to be implemented. Accordingly, except
for those terms specifically identified in Paragraph 3, the Parties agree that each term of the MTA
shall be applicable to all US Airways pilots at the earliest practicable time for each such term, and
such terms, when applicable, shall govern and displace any conflicting or wholly or partially
inconsistent provision of the former US Airways pilot agreements or the status quo arising thereunder.
Once the MTA has been fully implemented, it shall fully displace and render a nullity any prior
collective bargaining agreements applicable to US Airways pilots and any status quo arising
thereunder."
What if USAPA doesn't try to change the Nicolau award, but instead just presents separate east and west lists to the process?
#496
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
How did IT come to pass?
And how would the APA shield itself from an east DFR suit if it accepts something that never was??
The SLI protocols are clearly specified in the MOU...How do you propose to obtain an injunction against something that YOU overwhelmingly ratified?? Your case would require "merit", something that IT clearly lacks..
#497
Why because the voices in your head tell you so? Cant wait to hear the judges argument when he tells you to **** and leave his court room with your pathetic claim...You guys trully are pathetic...Talk about far reaching..
#498
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Didn't silver say you needed an LUP? She also said the company must ensure you have an LUP. So in fact it's not the voice in my head but a federal judges voice that says you need an LUP. Now that a you voted in a contract, what is your LUP to discard the Nicolau ?
#499
He gets much greater advancement vs. standalone with much greater opportunity. At the expense of east pilots. It's as clear as it can be.
I think that USAPA's DOH scheme, at least as Seham presented it, did the same thing to the west. It did have some protections for the west where the Nic had none.
I think that USAPA's DOH scheme, at least as Seham presented it, did the same thing to the west. It did have some protections for the west where the Nic had none.
This thing will be over before it starts simply due to the fact that the new company is not going to go on as before nor will the DOJ allow it to merge under those conditions. The company is not going to let itself be sued and the APA will not allow themselves to be held up for years while a court decides that an arbitration is an arbitration. Douglas will finally be forced to act and based on the companies letter to the NMB they know the only out is force the the east into submission and now they have the numbers with the APA to do it.
I am sick of this whole mess and its an embarrassment to even tell people that I work for this outfit. There was an agreement and binding is binding period end of story.
WD at AWA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post