AOL update
#311
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
So what? It will be your CBA when we enter the process and exchange data.
#312
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
#313
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
All courts said we have been damaged including the 9th. The reason we can't do anything about is the 9th said we can't "measure" damages until after a cba is ratified.
#315
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
You have been "damaged" by the economic realities and the language in the TA. It allowed it all. Life's a XXXXX, suck it up.
#316
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
No you don't, you know that because you say it right here:
What do we have here? uh oh, did you just vote a new contract in that will go into effect at por? Yep, you won't vote again because you already did.
Reality and truth.
What just happened with the MOU? IF the merger goes through, we just VOTED to the process that will definitively give us a JCBA, with all the caveats.
I really wonder where you get this stuff sometimes.
#317
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
You have been "damaged" by the economic realities and the language in the TA. It allowed it all. Life's a XXXXX, suck it up.
#318
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
No, we voted on a process that will lead to a JCBA sometime AFTER the POR. I've never said we didn't, that we just don't have one now. We know most of what's in it, but not all. And again, if the merger falls through, we are back to square one.
Your reality and truth need some work. I really suggest outside help.
#319
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
The east made an economic decision and gamble. The same with the west. We have all gambled and spent a lot of money to get in the game.
Meanwhile, I can't see anyone looking ahead of the boat.
#320
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Nope, usapa has been indefinitely parked by the NMB.( I wonder why you havent gotten that letter?) I get your point though, a vote would be required for a contract in that case. My opinions are based on merge going thru.
You do have one that is retroactive to feb 8th at POR, hence why we will sue at POR or 6 months from ratification to hold our claim. What is undeniable is you don't get any further votes on the make up of the jcba, your mou vote was it.
No, we voted on a process that will lead to a JCBA sometime AFTER the POR. I've never said we didn't, that we just don't have one now. We know most of what's in it, but not all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post