AOL update
#2761
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
I asked because your posts are hard to read and the .......nerve wracking. I knew she would enjoy the break from the more serious stuff.
I spared you the full critique. ;-)
#2762
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Premise (1)
If, as you say, she enjoyed her break by reading my post, my post must have caused her to enjoy her break. Things that cause one to enjoy one's break are enjoyable. Ergo, she enjoyed reading my post.
Premise (2)
Daughters will sometimes not tell the truth to please their fathers.
Because of its content, R-57s daughter knew her father would be displeased if she reported she enjoyed the post.
But by premise (1) she enjoyed the post.
Ergo, she did not tell R-57 the truth when she said the post was awful.
Conclusion: R-57 has been deceived by his daughter.
#2763
WD at AWA
#2764
WD at AWA
#2765
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
#2766
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
I don't know, something is fishy here, let's try some logic:
Premise (1)
If, as you say, she enjoyed her break by reading my post, my post must have caused her to enjoy her break. Things that cause one to enjoy one's break are enjoyable. Ergo, she enjoyed reading my post.
Premise (2)
Daughters will sometimes not tell the truth to please their fathers.
Because of its content, R-57s daughter knew her father would be displeased if she reported she enjoyed the post.
But by premise (1) she enjoyed the post.
Ergo, she did not tell R-57 the truth when she said the post was awful.
Conclusion: R-57 has been deceived by his daughter.
Premise (1)
If, as you say, she enjoyed her break by reading my post, my post must have caused her to enjoy her break. Things that cause one to enjoy one's break are enjoyable. Ergo, she enjoyed reading my post.
Premise (2)
Daughters will sometimes not tell the truth to please their fathers.
Because of its content, R-57s daughter knew her father would be displeased if she reported she enjoyed the post.
But by premise (1) she enjoyed the post.
Ergo, she did not tell R-57 the truth when she said the post was awful.
Conclusion: R-57 has been deceived by his daughter.
Want to answer my question now?
#2767
Seeing as how the man is a professional pilot and not a professional writer I would have to take that from her with a grain of salt provided its even the truth. This is but only one persons opinion and that too has to be taken with that grain of salt considering the source. I would say have her write about in the editors column that way we can all enjoy her assessment of his writing! Wiggy you up for that??
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
#2768
Now you will hear realy justify this by saying they followed the TA but we all know that if complete and utter donkey $hit. The TA was never ever designed to allow one group from honoring AN ARBITRATION RESULT. So when you hear west pilots and now pilots from other carriers refer to them as scabs it is because they like a scabs take jobs from working pilots to benefit themselves. The stench of what they have done will never ever be forgotten and there is not enough justification in the world to explain what they have done. They begged and pleaded for that arbitration and they got it. They begged and pleaded for George Nicalou and they got him. The east will for ever in my mind hold the title of scab for the very reason I have explained above.
WD at AWA
#2769
Are we there yet??!!
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
#2770
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
From R-57 we have:
Statement (1)
"My daughter is...above my intellectual level for sure."
-I accept that statement R, it is self-admitted and cannot be disputed.
Statement (2)
"She got her...brains from her mother"
-I likewise accept this as true. Combined with statement (1) we are now convinced that either:
a) Any intellectual capabilities R-57 possesses are not passed on as a heritable trait.
Or:
b) R-57 does not possess intellectual capabilities...such that they might be passed on as a heritable trait.
Statement (3)
"...your posts are hard to read..."
-The difficulty you experience in comprehending my posts makes it likely that Statement (2)(b) is true, ie. "R-57 does not possess intellectual capabilities..."
Statement (4)
"Your writing skills suck"
-In light of the truth of statements (1),(2), and (2)(b) very little credence can be given to this statement.
Corollary: The fact that it was proved earlier with irrefutable logic that R-57's daughter enjoyed reading Wiggy's post, and was successful at deceiving her father about such enjoyment...lends further truth-value to statement (2)(b) above ("R-57 does not possess intellectual capabilities")
1) R-57 does not possess intellectual capabilities.
2) A professional editor finds Wiggy's posts enjoyable, and therefore good.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post