AOL update
#2741
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
That is funny!
Not only do you refer to a nullified document, you also heard someone speculate about me being hired after the merger (which one?) and because I ignored them you now spout off like you know something. No wonder you are being fleeced by lawyers that have taken your cases to trial when it wasn't even ripe yet, twice.
Not only do you refer to a nullified document, you also heard someone speculate about me being hired after the merger (which one?) and because I ignored them you now spout off like you know something. No wonder you are being fleeced by lawyers that have taken your cases to trial when it wasn't even ripe yet, twice.
#2742
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
..."we're just mental midgets..."
So, R-57, just to set things straight, let me get your own personal position on a couple of issues, such as the 3rd lister controversy, and directly related to that...whether the West's expectations should include the benefits the east has enjoyed the last 7 years...I want to know what your personal opinion is, R, not what you "think" will happen, not what the arbitrators will do...but what you think "ought" to happen...I'm calling on you to make a personal, ethical judgement on these matters, if you're capable...you too PT.
Now, since I fully expect you to evade that question, and I suspect PT doesn't have the guts to answer that question, I will appeal to any and all Easters out there to, if not disown your spokesman PT, to at least repudiate the efforts of he and R-57 to add insult to injury with this 3rd lister/West expectations controversy....Anybody?
Starting to look that way. Well, maybe not mental midgets but full of crap and not as smart as you think you are.
I see as a grown man you've discovered the 13 year old girl trick of cutting and pasting snippets to create a silly context. That's quite a technique there, R, I'm sure we're all impressed and amused...darn, I wish I'd thought of doing that....
Ready to take on cacti for his immoral use of contract provisions?
The only thing I've gathered, is he had been on the 757, and is now being restored to it....Given the greater context of the Nic evasion travesty, if it is the result of some beneficial aspect of the east contract, then so be it...his airline brought the aircraft to the merger, he flew it, and now he will again...otherwise the standard might be: "what could he hold if the Nic were in place"
You are stating that PT is a 3rd lister. Maybe I should just go with my gut and say that you are either a westie, or have a close tie to one.
Well, your gut is experiencing what is known as "cognitive dissonance"....that is, the idea that the mind cannot hold two necessarily opposed ideas simultaneously and pose a rational overview...In this case, it is impossible for your mind to grasp that a wholly disinterested 3rd party could deem you and your group's actions as "morally and ethically reprehensible".
Turdt? How does that fit with your writing style. You're slipping Mr. CIA.
Well, that's easy...PT's mocking, divisive, goading presence on these boards is an abomination to those who seek fairness and justice where it concerns the very serious matter of their life's work...You and he may think it is a game, wink at each other, "FIAB", and get some kind of gratification out of antagonizing those you have gained some type of legal advantage over...but it is not a game, R, rest assured.
I see as a grown man you've discovered the 13 year old girl trick of cutting and pasting snippets to create a silly context. That's quite a technique there, R, I'm sure we're all impressed and amused...darn, I wish I'd thought of doing that....
Ready to take on cacti for his immoral use of contract provisions?
The only thing I've gathered, is he had been on the 757, and is now being restored to it....Given the greater context of the Nic evasion travesty, if it is the result of some beneficial aspect of the east contract, then so be it...his airline brought the aircraft to the merger, he flew it, and now he will again...otherwise the standard might be: "what could he hold if the Nic were in place"
You are stating that PT is a 3rd lister. Maybe I should just go with my gut and say that you are either a westie, or have a close tie to one.
Well, your gut is experiencing what is known as "cognitive dissonance"....that is, the idea that the mind cannot hold two necessarily opposed ideas simultaneously and pose a rational overview...In this case, it is impossible for your mind to grasp that a wholly disinterested 3rd party could deem you and your group's actions as "morally and ethically reprehensible".
Turdt? How does that fit with your writing style. You're slipping Mr. CIA.
Well, that's easy...PT's mocking, divisive, goading presence on these boards is an abomination to those who seek fairness and justice where it concerns the very serious matter of their life's work...You and he may think it is a game, wink at each other, "FIAB", and get some kind of gratification out of antagonizing those you have gained some type of legal advantage over...but it is not a game, R, rest assured.
Now, since I fully expect you to evade that question, and I suspect PT doesn't have the guts to answer that question, I will appeal to any and all Easters out there to, if not disown your spokesman PT, to at least repudiate the efforts of he and R-57 to add insult to injury with this 3rd lister/West expectations controversy....Anybody?
#2743
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
..."we're just mental midgets..."
So, R-57, just to set things straight, let me get your own personal position on a couple of issues, such as the 3rd lister controversy, and directly related to that...whether the West's expectations should include the benefits the east has enjoyed the last 7 years...I want to know what your personal opinion is, R, not what you "think" will happen, not what the arbitrators will do...but what you think "ought" to happen...I'm calling on you to make a personal, ethical judgement on these matters, if you're capable...you too PT.
Now, since I fully expect you to evade that question, and I suspect PT doesn't have the guts to answer that question, I will appeal to any and all Easters out there to, if not disown your spokesman PT, to at least repudiate the efforts of he and R-57 to add insult to injury with this 3rd lister/West expectations controversy....Anybody?
So, R-57, just to set things straight, let me get your own personal position on a couple of issues, such as the 3rd lister controversy, and directly related to that...whether the West's expectations should include the benefits the east has enjoyed the last 7 years...I want to know what your personal opinion is, R, not what you "think" will happen, not what the arbitrators will do...but what you think "ought" to happen...I'm calling on you to make a personal, ethical judgement on these matters, if you're capable...you too PT.
Now, since I fully expect you to evade that question, and I suspect PT doesn't have the guts to answer that question, I will appeal to any and all Easters out there to, if not disown your spokesman PT, to at least repudiate the efforts of he and R-57 to add insult to injury with this 3rd lister/West expectations controversy....Anybody?
#2744
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Just what I figured...ok R, you speak well when you say I seem to be wrapped around the axle...in fact I am not...I mean, this is all just gamesmanship, right? But if you were to simply ask why I care, the answer would be "principle". Good enough for you? Now, let's see if you can keep your word...your turn, R.
#2745
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Just what I figured...ok R, you speak well when you say I seem to be wrapped around the axle...in fact I am not...I mean, this is all just gamesmanship, right? But if you were to simply ask why I care, the answer would be "principle". Good enough for you? Now, let's see if you can keep your word...your turn, R.
#2747
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
#2748
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
In fact, I'd wager you don't express these opinions at all out on the line, it is only when you get behind a computer screen that your greed-motivated arguments come out...when you lose your grounding in ethical reality...
I gave you a chance to respond within the context of (somewhat) good-natured humor...You could have responded. "I can make a cynical technical argument that the 3rd listers should be merged by relative position with the west, but I don't really believe it, I do it to get a rise out of the west, and to make a point".
What that point would be no one knows, other than to add insult to injury...
#2749
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 182
There....I fixed it for you. Wiggy, you're a 1985 hire 767 Captain at Delta. Coming up on 30 years there. And rather than enjoying your charmed career, you're sticking your nose into other peoples business. And not just our business.....Everybody's business. You've commented about seniority arbitrations/integrations on almost every single board on APC. Delta/NW, United/Continental, SW/AirTran, US/AWA, and now US/AA. I realize you have a sense of entitlement, even though I'm not sure why you think you're entitled to tell everyone else how it should be. Do you really not have anything better to do that stir the pot? Isn't there something more interesting going on over on the "What's the latest and greatest with Delta" thread?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post