Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2014, 10:23 AM
  #2611  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Umm, that's a cut and paste from the document 300....
They have been trying to force USAPA to use the Nic for nearly a decade and spent millions of dollars, in no less than five court rooms all the way to the SCOTUS.

Now they have a court order stating the MB statute does not entitle the west pilots a seat at MB, and the company is asking Silver to specifically restate her order is binding on the west class.. And now they think the APA will give them a seat (in defiance of the Judges ruling and in defiance of the statute) so that they can let the west have the Nic...

Marty is set for life!
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 02-08-2014, 10:43 AM
  #2612  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

As is Seeham and what did he do for ya? Now I have to give credit where its do. Usapa played the delay game to the bone and got 7 yrs of status quo but the price of that was loa 93 for the duration. Usapa never ever put forth a list for which the 9th or Silver could compare. Now there is to be such a thing and its coming soon. So let me ask you, what do you REALLY THINK is going to happen when in usapa's last act they place a list on the table for which such a comparison can be done?

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 02-08-2014, 10:49 AM
  #2613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
As is Seeham and what did he do for ya? Now I have to give credit where its do. Usapa played the delay game to the bone and got 7 yrs of status quo but the price of that was loa 93 for the duration. Usapa never ever put forth a list for which the 9th or Silver could compare. Now there is to be such a thing and its coming soon. So let me ask you, what do you REALLY THINK is going to happen when in usapa's last act they place a list on the table for which such a comparison can be done?

WD at AWA
You must be the only west pilot that skipped her dicta. Catch up and while you're at it read the company's latest filing.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 02-08-2014, 11:00 AM
  #2614  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
You must be the only west pilot that skipped her dicta. Catch up and while you're at it read the company's latest filing.
My only regret is wasting time shooting these fish in a barrel. The temptation has just been too strong.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 02-08-2014, 11:31 AM
  #2615  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
If the west can use MB to implement a scheme that was never used, what's to stop the TWA pilots from trying to right their perceived(not taking a stand, don't know enough, but know how they felt) wrong?
Bevause it is up to the CBA isn't it? If the APA chooses they can give TWA status can't they? Havent we learned the CBA can do whatever it wants and only be sued after a final list? Remember you gave up the right to usapa when you voted in the mou specifying the apa take over.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 02-08-2014, 11:49 AM
  #2616  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
You must be the only west pilot that skipped her dicta. Catch up and while you're at it read the company's latest filing.
Just have not gotten around to the latest court filing(s) I have 12,000 plus titles in my kindle and sometimes need a break from the usapa trash.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 02-08-2014, 12:17 PM
  #2617  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Bevause it is up to the CBA isn't it? If the APA chooses they can give TWA status can't they? Havent we learned the CBA can do whatever it wants and only be sued after a final list? Remember you gave up the right to usapa when you voted in the mou specifying the apa take over.
The APA can do what their contract says, just like USAPA has done all along! (And if you look closely you will see something special for TWA pilots, sandbox pilots, not so much).
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 02-11-2014, 09:06 AM
  #2618  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default AOL update 3/10

Perseverance, Unity, Courage


These are the principles which have guided the former America West pilots over the last six years, and the developments of recent weeks have shown that we are more united and determined than ever as we enter the final phase of the East/West seniority dispute.


On Friday, February 7th, the Company filed a “Motion to Correct Court’s Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) and to modify Court’s order pursuant to Rule 52(b) and 59(e).” You can read the Rule 60 motion here. This motion asks Judge Silver to:


1. “describe the class to be bound by the judgment” and


2. “to remove Footnote 15 so that the Order cannot be construed to prohibit the Allied Pilots Association (“APA”) – after it has been certified as the single collective bargaining representative for all of the US Airways/American pilots – from creating and delegating authority to separate merger committees to represent the disparate seniority interests of the pre-merger US Airways and pre-merger American pilots”


In the first part, the Company contends that procedural rules require that the judgment in a class action should “...describe the members of the class.” According to the Company, Judge Silver’s order does not comply with this requirement, because it does not “include and describe those whom the court finds to be class members” and that there is nothing in the Judgment indicating that this case is a class action. Therefore, the Company is asking Judge Silver to describe the West Class using the same definition in the Court’s September 18, 2013 Order granting class certification (Doc. 194).


In the second part, the Company is asking Judge Silver to remove Footnote 15 which states:“The MOU contemplates the need for arbitration but also requires the post-merger carrier remain neutral. Under the Court’s reading of McCaskill-Bond, there will be no need for arbitration because, based on explicit language in the MOU, prior to the arbitration, there will have been an election and there will be only one certified representative for all pilots. Simply put, with the carrier having promised neutrality, there will not be two parties to go to arbitration.”


According to the Company, “if the US Airways/American pilots seniority-integration process is not completed before the National Mediation Board certifies the APA as the single collective bargaining representative for all of the post-merger (US Airways and American) pilots, the Court’s Order instructs that US Airways/American and the APA will both be responsible for ensuring that the pilot seniority lists are integrated in a lawful manner and in accordance with a lawful procedure. In order to avoid potential confusion, to provide maximum flexibility to resolve the seniority-integration dispute in a manner consistent with McCaskill-Bond and the APA’s ‘duty of fair representation to all employees’, including by means of an arbitration between merger committees, and to reduce the possibility of future legal challenges to the integrated seniority list that ultimately is generated, US Airways respectfully requests that the Court delete Footnote 15 in its Order – a footnote which is not essential to the Court’s holding regarding the status of the West Pilots in the McCaskill-Bond process.”


As a result of the Company’s Rule 60 motion, the 30-day window to file an appeal has been reset and does not restart until Judge Silver makes her final ruling to the Company’s motion.


We believe that the filing of this motion is a clear indication that the Company interprets Judge Silver’s order in a way that any rational person or union would: under McCaskill-Bond the West pilot class might not be entitled to a “seat at the table,” but the Bargaining Agent, whether USAPA or APA, at its own discretion and subject to its Duty of Fair Representation, can and should delegate authority to a separate West merger committee because of the inherent conflict between East and West pilots on the issue of seniority. This inherent conflict will not disappear when the East Pilots are folded into APA.


Once the National Mediation Board certifies the APA as the exclusive bargaining agent for both pre-merger US Airways and American Airlines pilots, the APA will owe a Duty of Fair Representation to all pilots – equally. It will also be the APA’s and the Company’s responsibility to ensure there is a “fair and equitable” seniority integration process as mandated by the McCaskill-Bond legislation. Creating three separate merger committees to “represent the disparate seniority interests” is, in our opinion, the safest method for the APA to comply with its DFR to all New American pilots, as well as comply with the McCaskill-Bond Act.


It can hardly be disputed that during the past six years, USAPA has repeatedly demonstrated hostility towards the West pilots in terms of seniority. We anticipate that APA has no interest in taking the path chosen by USAPA. In expectation of APA honoring its duty to all New American pilots, we believe the West pilots need an SLI attorney and are pleased to announce that we have been able to retain Jeff Freund to assist us in that capacity. Please join us in welcoming back Jeff.


We know the West pilots will share our exuberance over this development; the attorney who brought us the Nicolau will now be working side by side with the tremendous litigators who stopped USAPA dead in their tracks for six years. We also surmise that the West pilots have a ton of questions for these four attorneys. Since it has been a long time since our last “Meet and Greet,” we figured this was the opportune time for another one. So, mark your calendars for next week: Thursday, February 20th, at 10AM, at the Crowne Plaza Hotel located at the corner of 44th St. and Washington. Marty, Andy and Jen will be there, as will Jeff. The four attorneys will be available from 10AM-2PM. As always, spouses are welcome to attend.


We at Leonidas truly believe that the seniority dispute is nearing its conclusion. We also believe that the West would have never survived the USAPA onslaught were it not for the perseverance, unity and courage of this special pilot group. The past six years have been incredibly challenging and trying, but we have stuck together and most importantly, we haven’t changed who we are. The West work ethic is second to none. Six years of commitment along with several million dollars have saved the West from annihilation. Now, we’re almost there, and with your continued support we will finish this once and for all.


If you haven’t signed up for the Push For Justice campaign, please do so now by going to The Push For Justice .


Yours in unity.


Leonidas, LLC
cactiboss is offline  
Old 02-11-2014, 09:12 AM
  #2619  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Donate to the "believers"!!
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 02-11-2014, 09:21 AM
  #2620  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

PCU! The new catchphrase.
R57 relay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices