AOL update
#1421
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
I can't answer the "made whole" question, I imagine that will come after finding USAPA a failure of DFR in other court proceedings. I imagine the West will ask for damages. Their lost advancement and pay is certainly quantifiable, even under their current rates or even our own LOA93. Easily quantifiable losses is always an easy way to convince a judge on damages.
I imagine if that were to happen it might come in the form of an assessment, since the West will be a separate class it would be levied on the East. I shudder to think that I'll be paying for the sins of my fathers for something they did while I was at another job, but I'm a pessimist.
I imagine if that were to happen it might come in the form of an assessment, since the West will be a separate class it would be levied on the East. I shudder to think that I'll be paying for the sins of my fathers for something they did while I was at another job, but I'm a pessimist.
At this time we are governed by the transition agreement. It calls for a JCBA before any SLI can be used. We don't have one. We have a conditional one, one base on a merger that the DOJ has filed suit to block. If that happens, we have no JCBA, no implementation of a SLI, so as of today there is no damage to the west group from the east. They have lost no advancement because the TA was has not been completed and absent that completion-separate operations. There is loss, but is because of other factors, ones they were warned about. Those same separate operations have allowed you to be more senior than you would have been as a third lister.(Did I get that right? I seem to remember that you were a third lister)
Have you educated yourself? Have you read the TA and the various court filings? The MOU and what it actually says?
You still didn't answer the original questions about what he hell WD was taking about in the "award." Do some research and get back to me.
Last edited by R57 relay; 09-25-2013 at 06:23 PM.
#1422
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
No joint contract, no date certain, no new pay rates to quantify losses.
However, if you were to be correct there haven't been 1700 available Captain upgrades or open wide body jobs out East. So, even if they could somehow prevail only a small group of the most senior might see a payout but it won't be the entire West pilot group.
#1423
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
The thing the drizzle seems to be lost on is that the current DFR is about USAPA's actions with regard to the MOU. Their previous DFR failed and the courts said that there was no claim until we had a JCBA. It's not that there is anything magic about a JCBA, it's that in this case the JCBA is what completed the TA and completing the TA was the requirement for using the Nicolau award. Until the TA is complete there is a REQUIREMENT for separate ops. Separate ops-no damage.
The west pilots seem to think that any old JCBA will do, but the JCBA they voted for(Silver says it's a JCBA) changed the document that would trigger the Nicolau award and says it won't be used.
Judge Silver distilled this DFR to one question-did USAPA fail it's DFR by not including the Nicolau award in the MOU. No merger, no MOU, no DFR and back to square one. The west lawyers said this.
The west pilots seem to think that any old JCBA will do, but the JCBA they voted for(Silver says it's a JCBA) changed the document that would trigger the Nicolau award and says it won't be used.
Judge Silver distilled this DFR to one question-did USAPA fail it's DFR by not including the Nicolau award in the MOU. No merger, no MOU, no DFR and back to square one. The west lawyers said this.
#1424
I would disagree. The TA said separate ops till a new contract plus an additional 12 months before a joint bid was posted.
No joint contract, no date certain, no new pay rates to quantify losses.
However, if you were to be correct there haven't been 1700 available Captain upgrades or open wide body jobs out East. So, even if they could somehow prevail only a small group of the most senior might see a payout but it won't be the entire West pilot group.
No joint contract, no date certain, no new pay rates to quantify losses.
However, if you were to be correct there haven't been 1700 available Captain upgrades or open wide body jobs out East. So, even if they could somehow prevail only a small group of the most senior might see a payout but it won't be the entire West pilot group.
You imagine? You tell me that I'm in for in "a rude, albeit slow, awakening" yet you imagine? Have you not learned anything since you have been here?
At this time we are governed by the transition agreement. It calls for a JCBA before any SLI can be used. We don't have one. We have a conditional one, one base on a merger that the DOJ has filed suit to block. If that happens, we have no JCBA, no implementation of a SLI, so as of today there is no damage to the west group from the east. They have lost no advancement because the TA was has not been completed and absent that completion-separate operations. There is loss, but is because of other factors, ones they were warned about. Those same separate operations have allowed you to be more senior than you would have been as a third lister.(Did I get that right? I seem to remember that you were a third lister)
Have you educated yourself? Have you read the TA and the various court filings? The MOU and what it actually says?
You still didn't answer the original questions about what he hell WD was taking about in the "award." Do some research and get back to me.
At this time we are governed by the transition agreement. It calls for a JCBA before any SLI can be used. We don't have one. We have a conditional one, one base on a merger that the DOJ has filed suit to block. If that happens, we have no JCBA, no implementation of a SLI, so as of today there is no damage to the west group from the east. They have lost no advancement because the TA was has not been completed and absent that completion-separate operations. There is loss, but is because of other factors, ones they were warned about. Those same separate operations have allowed you to be more senior than you would have been as a third lister.(Did I get that right? I seem to remember that you were a third lister)
Have you educated yourself? Have you read the TA and the various court filings? The MOU and what it actually says?
You still didn't answer the original questions about what he hell WD was taking about in the "award." Do some research and get back to me.
I've stuck my nose in enough on this topic. I'll have no control of my destiny until enough retirements make the 3rd listers a viable voting block.
I'll leave this echo chamber to you and the west boys.
#1425
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
I have in fact read as much as I could since I've had access to the entire library on the USAPA site. Reading and watching the progression of rulings tells me that USAPA is grasping at straws.
I've said enough on this topic, I'll have no control of my destiny until enough retirements make the 3rd listers a viable voting block.
I'll leave this echo chamber to you.
I've said enough on this topic, I'll have no control of my destiny until enough retirements make the 3rd listers a viable voting block.
I'll leave this echo chamber to you.
There is no rude awaking for me. I've been living and active with this battle for 8 years. I have listened to both sides. I might be wrong about what is happening, but I very aware of it.
#1426
I would disagree. The TA said separate ops till a new contract plus an additional 12 months before a joint bid was posted.
No joint contract, no date certain, no new pay rates to quantify losses.
However, if you were to be correct there haven't been 1700 available Captain upgrades or open wide body jobs out East. So, even if they could somehow prevail only a small group of the most senior might see a payout but it won't be the entire West pilot group.
No joint contract, no date certain, no new pay rates to quantify losses.
However, if you were to be correct there haven't been 1700 available Captain upgrades or open wide body jobs out East. So, even if they could somehow prevail only a small group of the most senior might see a payout but it won't be the entire West pilot group.
No one out west has sued or gone to court on that basis alone. The DFR was never about damages but rather merit. The 9th circuit viewed that case based damages to west careers but as often the case with the 9th (check their record) they got it wrong. If the case had included damages from the onset the 9th could have reviewed that along with merit and this thing would have been over years ago.
AOL made a huge mistake not asking for damages in the beginning ie can't get what you don't ask for.
WD at AWA
#1427
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Completely incorrect! The only requirement would be to show damage right? Ok so how does one define damage? The way that airlines have done this in the past is called pay protection. The minute that one pilot on the list became captain ahead of one senior to them on that list damages begin. This has being going since the east refused to honor the arbitration. Every west first officer is senior to the most jr east captain therefore its an easy case to make.
No one out west has sued or gone to court on that basis alone. The DFR was never about damages but rather merit. The 9th circuit viewed that case based damages to west careers but as often the case with the 9th (check their record) they got it wrong. If the case had included damages from the onset the 9th could have reviewed that along with merit and this thing would have been over years ago.
AOL made a huge mistake not asking for damages in the beginning ie can't get what you don't ask for.
WD at AWA
No one out west has sued or gone to court on that basis alone. The DFR was never about damages but rather merit. The 9th circuit viewed that case based damages to west careers but as often the case with the 9th (check their record) they got it wrong. If the case had included damages from the onset the 9th could have reviewed that along with merit and this thing would have been over years ago.
AOL made a huge mistake not asking for damages in the beginning ie can't get what you don't ask for.
WD at AWA
Want to sue someone? Sue yourself for the TA and the west's delaying lawsuits.
#1428
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
#1429
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Then why the DFR cacti? You know what Judge Silver says the DFR is really about now, right?
Judge Silver:
" In other words, the West Pilots’ claim is that USAPA
breached the duty of fair representation when it entered into the MOU because the MOU
does not require USAPA use the Nicolau Award in the McCaskill-Bond process."
How can it be in there if you are suing because it is not in there?
Judge Silver:
" In other words, the West Pilots’ claim is that USAPA
breached the duty of fair representation when it entered into the MOU because the MOU
does not require USAPA use the Nicolau Award in the McCaskill-Bond process."
How can it be in there if you are suing because it is not in there?
#1430
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Then why the DFR cacti? You know what Judge Silver says the DFR is really about now, right?
Judge Silver:
" In other words, the West Pilots’ claim is that USAPA
breached the duty of fair representation when it entered into the MOU because the MOU
does not require USAPA use the Nicolau Award in the McCaskill-Bond process."
How can it be in there if you are suing because it is not in there?
Judge Silver:
" In other words, the West Pilots’ claim is that USAPA
breached the duty of fair representation when it entered into the MOU because the MOU
does not require USAPA use the Nicolau Award in the McCaskill-Bond process."
How can it be in there if you are suing because it is not in there?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post