Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2013, 06:16 AM
  #1171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Im almost certain that you can not claim grants as an operating profit so kinda use your head here. Now the 2003 vs 2004 you have a valid point so my bad.

WD at AWA
You telling someone to use their head. Take your own advice.

I highlighted just that. You had an operating profit of around 13 million that year and a net of 50 something million. But, without the government funds you would have had an operating profit and a net loss.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 04:40 PM
  #1172  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default AMR jun 3 filing

"American Airlines, Inc., and its parent company, AMR Corporation (collectively“American”) previously filed an Application for Intervenor status in this litigation. DOCKET NO. 56.

American sought that status in order to highlight the fact that, should Plaintiffs prevail,
equitable relief entered in this case might inadvertently interfere with the obligations and rights of
Defendants US Airways, Inc., and US Airline Pilots Association (“USAPA”), as well as those of
American and its pilots’ union, the Allied Pilots Association (“APA”), memorialized in a
Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”), which was, at the time, pending approval of the
Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York. In particular, American expressed the
concern that equitable relief in this action could interfere with the timetables and processes of the
merger-related seniority integration process.
As explained in American’s Application, the efficiencies and synergies contemplated by
the merger between American and US Airways depend on the four parties to the MOU
commencing and completing the pilot seniority integration process on the strict timetable
bargained for in that Agreement. Those efficiencies and synergies lie at the heart of the proposed
Plan of Reorganization currently pending approval in American’s Chapter 11 case. No party has
opposed American’s Application to Intervene. It is now ripe for decision.
American files this Supplemental Memorandum to advise the Court that on Thursday,
May 30, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court approved the MOU. A copy of the Bankruptcy Court’s
Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Although the MOU remains contingent on the
consummation of the merger, it is otherwise a final and enforceable agreement of the parties with
respect to those procedural aspects of the MOU’s seniority process."
So let's see, everyone agrees that the mou is a jcba and that the mou was completely seniority neutral for east and west. By everyone I mean LCC, AMR, APA an Aol. Usapa of course doesn't agree.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 05:49 PM
  #1173  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
The arbitration has been legally blocked?? Why didn't someone say so I had no idea the courts had blocked the arbitration. Well hell I want read that gotta link or an order from the court that states the arbitration has been legally blocked??? Please post I have got to read that.
That wasn't even a good job of taking someone out of context. This is, of course, what I did say:

"The arbitration was legally blocked from being implemented". I bolded the important part so that even you couldn't miss it. If you still doubt me, then why aren't you exercising your Nic seniority number?

That out of context stuff looks like fun. Let me try:

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
The arbitration has been legally blocked...because...we...are...a group of dumb ass pilots?
Gee, that was fun!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 06:01 PM
  #1174  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
So let's see, everyone agrees that the mou is a jcba and that the mou was completely seniority neutral for east and west. By everyone I mean LCC, AMR, APA an Aol. Usapa of course doesn't agree.
OK. If the MOU is a JCBA, then your case is ripe. Great. What does the MOU/JCBA say? It says you guys need to bring your seniority lists to the arbitration with APA. And you west pilots agreed to this MOU/JCBA language by over 95%. So now that your case is ripe, what's the point you're trying to argue in your case again? A claim of DFR against the union that produced a document that you voted for by over 95%? A claim of a non-legitimate union purpose by creating language you voted for by over 95%? A claim that the Nic must be used even though your strongly supported MOU/JCBA language clearly states seniority neutrality and specifically uses the word "lists"?

This will be a very interesting study in case law.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-03-2013, 07:14 PM
  #1175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That wasn't even a good job of taking someone out of context. This is, of course, what I did say:

"The arbitration was legally blocked from being implemented". I bolded the important part so that even you couldn't miss it. If you still doubt me, then why aren't you exercising your Nic seniority number?

That out of context stuff looks like fun. Let me try:



Gee, that was fun!

Carl
Whats fun is really watching you pucker up to east rears! Hows that taste btw?

This is what I wrote, if you are going quote me don't cut mix and match!!!
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
legally block it and if you want to do something about fund your suit and sue us. Why because a group of dumb ass pilots have shown us the way and now we have case law. That blade cuts both ways
WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 07:42 AM
  #1176  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
So let's see, everyone agrees that the mou is a jcba and that the mou was completely seniority neutral for east and west. By everyone I mean LCC, AMR, APA an Aol. Usapa of course doesn't agree.
Cactiboss, you have a habit of ignoring truths that don't support your conclusions.
"US Airways & APA do not care about DFR status and only want the shortest route to East/West list integration. They are leveraging a ripe DFR opinion to [attempt] a shorter SLI timeline. Management has already achieved a nondisclosure agreement [to attempt] settlement negotiation and final judgement. —Why?

[Sure, newAA management is posturing to avoid liability, but they also] need to take full advantage of AA code sharing being free to reshuffle East/West flying. This also implies that PHX will be reduced and it's block hours outsourced to other AA/East bases with healthy O/D traffic—what other sensitive information could a nondisclosure agreement protecting?"
"~Reposted from 116"

Judge Silver already deferred an injunction that would force Nicolai submission for SLI—why? The outcome of this case may be largely tied by the summations of previous judgements and the RLA.

It is already established that USAPA is free, no matter how dangerous, to use a legitimate union purpose to not submit Nic in SLI. Judge Silver does not have the RLA authority to make a clear decision in this case and seems to be walking a very fine line.

My conclusion, this is not a time for everyone to be chest thumping:
  • None of us have enough education to fully understand what is going on.
  • No one knows behind scenes politics—AA/US Air management declaring a ripe DFR
  • At least one group is going to be largely disappointed by the collective court proceedings.

I for one will feel badly for either pilot group that does not prevail—both groups have painted themselves into such desperate corners.
flybywire44 is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:19 AM
  #1177  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
I for one will feel badly for either pilot group that does not prevail—both groups have painted themselves into such desperate corners.
100% right on this. If you exclude the Cactiboss' and the WD's, I can't help but think cooler heads could come up with a tolerable solution.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 09:22 AM
  #1178  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
This is what I wrote, if you are going quote me don't cut mix and match!!!
Oh, you picked up on that eh?

It's really idiotic when people do that, isn't it.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 10:05 AM
  #1179  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
Cactiboss, you have a habit of ignoring truths that don't support your conclusions.
"US Airways & APA do not care about DFR status and only want the shortest route to East/West list integration. They are leveraging a ripe DFR opinion to [attempt] a shorter SLI timeline. Management has already achieved a nondisclosure agreement [to attempt] settlement negotiation and final judgement. —Why?

[Sure, newAA management is posturing to avoid liability, but they also] need to take full advantage of AA code sharing being free to reshuffle East/West flying. This also implies that PHX will be reduced and it's block hours outsourced to other AA/East bases with healthy O/D traffic—what other sensitive information could a nondisclosure agreement protecting?"
"~Reposted from 116"
Judge Silver already deferred an injunction that would force Nicolai submission for SLI—why? The outcome of this case may be largely tied by the summations of previous judgements and the RLA.

It is already established that USAPA is free, no matter how dangerous, to use a legitimate union purpose to not submit Nic in SLI. Judge Silver does not have the RLA authority to make a clear decision in this case and seems to be walking a very fine line.

My conclusion, this is not a time for everyone to be chest thumping:
  • None of us have enough education to fully understand what is going on.
  • No one knows behind scenes politics—AA/US Air management declaring a ripe DFR
  • At least one group is going to be largely disappointed by the collective court proceedings.

I for one will feel badly for either pilot group that does not prevail—both groups have painted themselves into such desperate corners.
Judge Silver deferred the injunction because the 9th made a bad ruling that tied her hands, she repeats as much in the latest transcripts. AMR in their filings say the west remedy is appropriate and wont interfere with the mou timelines. So AMR just reiterated that the MOU now approved by bk judge is a jcba, usapa will no longer negotiate seniority in the collective bargaining process.

Last edited by cactiboss; 06-04-2013 at 10:18 AM.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 06-04-2013, 10:47 AM
  #1180  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Judge Silver deferred the injunction because the 9th made a bad ruling that tied her hands, she repeats as much in the latest transcripts. AMR in their filings say the west remedy is appropriate and wont interfere with the mou timelines. So AMR just reiterated that the MOU now approved by bk judge is a jcba, usapa will no longer negotiate seniority in the collective bargaining process.
AMR's statements are only opinions until Judge Silver rules and how can she "untie" her hands from the 9th?

...waiting on the fat lady to sing... any week now.
flybywire44 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices