Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
How It All Went Down. Interesting Details >

How It All Went Down. Interesting Details

Search

Notices

How It All Went Down. Interesting Details

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2013, 06:52 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Airbus
Posts: 634
Default How It All Went Down. Interesting Details

Deal for AMR Reached Turning Point as US Airways Courted Pilots - WSJ.com



AMR Corp. AAMRQ +19.81% and US Airways Group Inc.'s LCC +3.65% agreement to merge reached a turning point last March in a posh New York restaurant, when a lieutenant for US Airways Chief Executive Doug Parker enlisted AMR's American Airline pilots to his cause.

That agreement raised the heat on AMR chief Tom Horton who had been resisting a deal, preferring for the American Airlines parent to exit bankruptcy on its own.

On Thursday, Mr. Horton hinted that his reluctance was meant to ensure that AMR's creditors got the best deal. "There was a little poker playing going on in the process," he said.

The following account of how 14 months of posturing and threats resulted in a deal to form the world's largest airline is based on more than a dozen interviews over the past year with people involved in the discussions.

On Nov. 29, 2011, the morning American filed for bankruptcy protection, the rival airline bosses spoke by phone, with Mr. Parker exploring the possibility of a merger. Mr. Horton stressed the airline needed to spend time reorganizing and remaking labor contracts before considering a deal.

But American's pilots had already expressed displeasure with American's management, which aimed to cut the pilots' pay and benefits to better compete with other big airlines.

US Airways, meanwhile, had hired bankers at Barclays BARC.LN +0.71% PLC and Millstein & Co. and lawyers at Latham & Watkins LLP to study a merger. In February the airline started making presentations on Wall Street about the benefits of a combination. The airline also visited Lazard Ltd. LAZ +0.40% bankers representing American's pilots, who found a deal intriguing.

Mr. Horton, though, told Mr. Parker that US Airways public campaign for a merger wasn't constructive.

The pressure on Mr. Horton kept rising, however.

During a February dinner in a Manhattan skyscraper overlooking the Empire State Building, advisers for AMR's creditors committee urged that Mr. Horton and his advisers at investment bank Rothschild and law firm Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP study merger options.

And in mid-March, US Airways President Scott Kirby met Capt. David Bates, then president of American's pilots union, in a small dining room at Oceana, an upscale seafood restaurant in midtown Manhattan. The goal: Start negotiations on tentative contracts with US Airways on how American's unionized pilots, flight attendants, mechanics and ground workers would be treated in a marriage.

Mr. Bates liked what he heard.

Messrs. Parker and Kirby later flew by private jet to meet the board of the American pilots union at a Dallas hotel. They reconvened at the union's nearby headquarters after a newspaper reporter staked out the hotel

On April 20, US Airways was able to trumpet support for a merger from all the big AMR unions, catching Mr. Horton off guard.

US Airways that same day made a formal merger proposal to AMR and its creditors, suggesting that the creditors own 49.9% of a combined airline, leaving US Airways shareholders in control. The proposal also included issuing $1.5 billion in new debt to AMR's creditors.

The proposal was ignored.

In May, though, American opened the door to a deal, signing a "protocol" agreement with its creditors committee and pledging to jointly explore "potential consolidation scenarios." The pact ensured that creditors-committee advisers could mediate negotiations between the two airlines.

In July, a day after touting a possible merger at the National Press Club in Washington, Mr. Parker met Mr. Horton for breakfast at the Jefferson Hotel. Over oatmeal, Mr. Horton told Mr. Parker that American wouldn't rush into a deal and that it would explore a range of restructuring options.

US Airways along the way worried it would be suckered into negotiations, a delaying tactic to allow American to go it alone. At various points between September and February, US Airways mulled a so-called hostile offer, making a merger proposal to American's creditors. Such a move would be problematic, though, since bankruptcy law gave American effective control of its restructuring process.

Creditor bankers at Moelis & Co., as well as US Airways' financial advisers at Millstein and Barclays, recommended that US Airways stick with direct negotiations to get a deal before American's board.

In the ensuing weeks, a group of hedge funds and other traders holding American's debt started discussions with the airline about providing financing to help the company exit bankruptcy independently, making plain they wouldn't be rushed into any deal.

At summer's end, after signing a nondisclosure agreement, US Airways exchanged confidential information with American to discuss a deal. US Airways executives worried they could no longer press their case in public.

In mid-November US Airways proposed that American's creditors own 70% of a combined airline, and US Airways shareholders 30%, with Mr. Parker running it.

"My entire career has prepared me for this moment," he told the creditors committee around the same time.

Still, another roadblock occurred. Around Thanksgiving, advisers for American and its creditors told their counterparts at US Airways that AMR's board believed its creditors should own at least 80% of the combined company.

US Airways advisers were incensed, but negotiations continued. Mr. Horton suggested getting a handle on labor costs in the merger and then revisiting how to divide ownership.

In December, the airlines and their pilots unions spent about 15 days negotiating more detailed agreements on how to integrate the workforces, holding round-the-clock talks at the Dallas offices of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, American's bankruptcy lawyers. American's bankers at Rothschild, and bankers at Houlihan Lokey representing certain bondholders worked on a complex bankruptcy arrangement that would likely repay creditors fully and, in an unusual move, provide financial recoveries for the airline's existing shareholders.

In January, American's hedge-fund bondholders—including J.P. Morgan Securities, Pentwater Capital Management LP and Litespeed Management LLC—signed confidentiality agreements to compare a merger with American's stand-alone reorganization plan. American, its creditors and US Airways raced to finish a deal before this Friday, when the bondholders' confidentiality agreements expired.
nwa757 is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 07:43 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TQ Nola's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 253
Default

"During a February dinner in a Manhattan skyscraper overlooking the Empire State Building".... I was not aware Manhattan had any skyscrapers overlooking the Empire State Building.

Good read, though, thanks.
TQ Nola is offline  
Old 02-15-2013, 07:57 PM
  #3  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Default



8 of the pilots in this photo look like they're wearing their hats for the first time.
flybywire44 is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 02:36 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: AB 320 Captain
Posts: 355
Default

I would love to see the pilots faces in several years considering the future grievances concerning the MOU. The wording of the MOU is a lawyers dream.
I changed my vote to no on the MOU, it leaves most items up to the managements interpretation.
I do believe DP is the best man to lead the new company. My hope is that APA will have the support from the entire pilot group to return dignity to the Airline Pilot profession.
CaptainBigWood is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 05:26 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
8 of the pilots in this photo look like they're wearing their hats for the first time.
Couple of 1970's mustaches too.

Why do I get the feeling they are thinking,"I will finally get to fly that 777 with my rightly deserved DOH?"
boog123 is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 06:17 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 172
Default

If you are counting on APA for advancing the profession you are in for a major disappointment. Look at the history of APA. APA was created by a group of hot heads with the support and encouragement of C.R. Smith, AA CEO and no friend of pilots. By agreeing to not require the training of the professional engineers so they could move into a pilot seat as ALPA had negotiated with all the carriers, C.R. saved over 10 million dollars in 1963 when a dollar was really worth something. Over and over again APA has helped management diminish the career expectations of the American Airline pilots and in many instances leading the rest of the profession down the drain. Can you say "B" scale?

Last edited by Night Hawk 6; 02-16-2013 at 06:18 AM. Reason: grammer
Night Hawk 6 is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 06:28 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

they also were the driving force behind alter ego carriers at regionals, via the scope restriction. APA scope was to protect AA pilots jobs but inadvertently pushed regionals to start alter ego carriers to be able to gain contract feeds with larger than 50 seat aircraft. Then the bottom fell out when management figured out they could start alter ego carriers within there holding corporation and beat down there costs with internal fighting for jobs.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 06:52 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by Night Hawk 6
If you are counting on APA for advancing the profession you are in for a major disappointment. Look at the history of APA. APA was created by a group of hot heads with the support and encouragement of C.R. Smith, AA CEO and no friend of pilots. By agreeing to not require the training of the professional engineers so they could move into a pilot seat as ALPA had negotiated with all the carriers, C.R. saved over 10 million dollars in 1963 when a dollar was really worth something. Over and over again APA has helped management diminish the career expectations of the American Airline pilots and in many instances leading the rest of the profession down the drain. Can you say "B" scale?
Although I agree on most of your points, I must say that the APA managed to retain their retirement plans and book rates longer than their counterparts. In the end the BK process forced their hand to accept the NEW NORM of industry standard compensation. However, my hats off to their solidarity and strength for standing up to their management during the threat of 1113c imposition by the BK court. In the end the APA made out much better than its counterparts at ALPA and USAPA...Of course "with a little help from my friends"..
I for one look forward to this merger with a sense of hope and optimism that has been absent from my career for the past 12 years. I am ready to move forward.
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 10:24 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Default

by making concessions they kicked the can down the road too.
Agree APA has fragmented the profession
Spoiler is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 11:28 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by Spoiler
by making concessions they kicked the can down the road too.
Agree APA has fragmented the profession
...And what did ALPA do?
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flavio340
American
4
08-17-2012 07:55 PM
nicholasblonde
Regional
27
08-31-2008 07:55 AM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
1
06-06-2008 07:03 PM
TimSmith
Major
2
05-31-2008 12:46 PM
Purple Nugget
Cargo
20
04-28-2008 12:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices