Search

Notices

What now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2012, 02:13 PM
  #41  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Maybe ALPA doesn't suck as bad as everybody thinks.
Well, I do agree with your assertion that everybody thinks ALPA sucks.

Everybody can't be wrong.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 02:17 PM
  #42  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Well, I do agree with your assertion that everybody thinks ALPA sucks.

Everybody can't be wrong.
Yeah, your life truly sucks compared to everybody else's, and it's all ALPA's fault. GMAFB
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 02:47 PM
  #43  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Yeah, your life truly sucks compared to everybody else's, and it's all ALPA's fault. GMAFB
Given the massive leverage ALPA squandered, I'm not sure how we can pat ourselves on the back and be happy about it. Well, as long as you got yours. That's the important part.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 02:58 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you are saying that the attorneys that the independent union has hired are not very good? I mean, there is no conflict of interest, those lawyers aren't working for anybody else.. ostensibly... and (in your words) they bungled the case) Hmmmmm THAT is very interesting. How do you know that the next attorneys will be any better? Maybe ALPA doesn't suck as bad as everybody thinks. Naaaaahh couldn't be THAT..
The firm that APA hired (Lazard) had one goal: to recommend the least-risk option to the membership, which was a Yes vote. They also would have gotten a lot more $$$ with a Yes vote.
aa73 is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 02:59 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you are saying that the attorneys that the independent union has hired are not very good? I mean, there is no conflict of interest, those lawyers aren't working for anybody else.. ostensibly... and (in your words) they bungled the case) Hmmmmm THAT is very interesting. How do you know that the next attorneys will be any better? Maybe ALPA doesn't suck as bad as everybody thinks. Naaaaahh couldn't be THAT..
Are these same ALPA attorneys representing ALPA against the TWA pilots? Oh, and how is that case going again?
Ball Breaker is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 03:49 PM
  #46  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Given the massive leverage ALPA squandered, I'm not sure how we can pat ourselves on the back and be happy about it. Well, as long as you got yours. That's the important part.
Discussing this with you is like explaining physics to a 4 year old. You just have no clue. We're done, so you can lob all the Molotovs you want. I DO hope you realize that you will benefit from our latest contract far more than I.. but I guess you don't see that either. Don't worry though, you will.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 03:50 PM
  #47  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Ball Breaker
Are these same ALPA attorneys representing ALPA against the TWA pilots? Oh, and how is that case going again?

I'm not the least bit concerned about that. Funny though how you totally dodged the question at hand.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 03:55 PM
  #48  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
The firm that APA hired (Lazard) had one goal: to recommend the least-risk option to the membership, which was a Yes vote. They also would have gotten a lot more $$$ with a Yes vote.
So the APA did a bad job of hiring attorneys then? I don't get it. If they had recommended the course that you have set upon, and you get taken to the woodshed, would you think they have done the correct thing for you? That makes no sense. If you just want a rubber stamp to agree with the anger and encourage you while you commit hari kiri, hell, I'll do that for you for a cool $500,000. Tell me what you want, and I'll go right along with that.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-20-2012, 04:27 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
Default

I don't know the specifics as to why APA went with Lazard. They didn't call me to ask my opinion, and I'm even not qualified to give it.

All I know is that Lazard and the APA leadership tried to sell us a turd, and we waved the B.S. flag. Period. The TA was THE most concessionary piece of crap ever to hit the airline pilot profession, and frankly it was embarrassing to watch Lazard and APA's eyes glossing over it.

So do we get a worse deal by voting down the TA? Dunno. What I *DO* know is that we refuse to live on our knees. If we're gonna get slammed with something worst than the TA, it won't be because we caved.

Make no mistake, AMR, the UCC and Judge Lane absolutely dread not having a pilot contract in place. Therein lies our leverage, and we plan on taking full advantage of it.
aa73 is offline  
Old 08-21-2012, 02:13 AM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

The advisors certainly don't inspire much confidence. The BOD had all this inside confidential info, yet barely half of them were convinced enough to vote to send it to the pilots. Additionally, the TA was devoid of most critical contract language and Lazard was recommending pilots pin the remainder of their careers on mostly bullet points..........ridiculous and absurd.

I understand Lazard has past and present relationships with some of the creditors including BOD positions, so many see too much incest.

Bottom line is pilots need to take control of their futures and think for themselves for a change, instead of blindly accepting that told to them from entities and sources with conflicting interests.
eaglefly is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices