AMR / US AIRWAYS - any recent news ?
#11
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Can you clarify how exactly the Term Sheet/USAirways agreement is one iota better than the AA offer? Have you actually read the POS that you guys agreed to with Parker? It is a joke. It is concessionary off of our POS LOA 93 (which was bankruptcy era 10 years ago). Your brain trust in DFW fell hook, line, and sinker for Parker's line. Ya'll got in such a hurry to agree to anything (at least I like to think it was because it was rushed, not out of arrogance at being the "Almighty APA"), you signed off on an even bigger Crap Sandwich than you could have gotten at home. Mark my words, if this merger comes to pass, your beloved term sheet will come back to haunt us all.
For once, I find myself agreeing with Tomahawk. At least you know the devil you're dancing with now -- the one you want to climb into bed with is A LOT worse. Wake up and realize the boys from PHX are no friend of labor (regardless of what they say...).
For once, I find myself agreeing with Tomahawk. At least you know the devil you're dancing with now -- the one you want to climb into bed with is A LOT worse. Wake up and realize the boys from PHX are no friend of labor (regardless of what they say...).
At any rate, I have read the U conditional agreement and agree it isn't desirable.......far from it. Sadly, it is still FAR better then the term sheet demands here, including slightly higher pay provisions, a no furlough clause and better scope and code-sharing provisions, just name a few. Unfortunatly for you, we were not in this to negotiate a better contract for USAPA, but then again I can see your anger at us for not doing so considering your inability or unwillingness to do that for yourselves. We are simply doing whatever is necessary to best preserve our careers and a drowning man will grasp whatever rope handed to him, no matter how slippery it is. With the term sheet provisions, AA pilots careers are basically over, so we have nowhere to go but up. The leaky and wobbly U boat is the only boat to climb into right now and until a better boat shows up, that's the way it is.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
#14
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Maybe instead of just throwing terms like that around you should take the time to really understand what is happening. The most vocal complaints over this are from the WEST. The are the ones that will be taking the hits as there is little in the east contract that is better than the term sheet. They have many better provisions that it looks like will just be thrown out the window while Parker is saying things like the SLI will be a three way.
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
#16
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: A330 F/O
Posts: 22
The New APA CBA leaves it up to Parker et Co., to do what they want. Almost no restrictions!
BTW, why does the PDF document from APA have a "CONFIDENTIAL" across every page?
Shouldn't we want every APA and USAPA pilot to read this piece of $hit?
I can answer the above question I posed: Because the agreement is total garbage!
PS Several pilots I've talked to, USAPA and APA, have no clue what this agreement contains. The USAPA pilots (At least the East) are only thinking $$$...i.e. the $172.hour. Boy, will these pilots be surprised if this merger happens and this agreement stands!
BTW, why does the PDF document from APA have a "CONFIDENTIAL" across every page?
Shouldn't we want every APA and USAPA pilot to read this piece of $hit?
I can answer the above question I posed: Because the agreement is total garbage!
PS Several pilots I've talked to, USAPA and APA, have no clue what this agreement contains. The USAPA pilots (At least the East) are only thinking $$$...i.e. the $172.hour. Boy, will these pilots be surprised if this merger happens and this agreement stands!
#17
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: A330 F/O
Posts: 22
I'd rather take around 150-160/hour, but make that a floor, 35 days of vacation (easily split into 5x7 days), 5:15/daily etc. etc.
We shall see...
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
I agree, this APA agreement is really sticking to the West. I'm still hoping that we can change some of the language in this agreement.
I'd rather take around 150-160/hour, but make that a floor, 35 days of vacation (easily split into 5x7 days), 5:15/daily etc. etc.
We shall see...
I'd rather take around 150-160/hour, but make that a floor, 35 days of vacation (easily split into 5x7 days), 5:15/daily etc. etc.
We shall see...
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,502
Maybe instead of just throwing terms like that around you should take the time to really understand what is happening. The most vocal complaints over this are from the WEST. The are the ones that will be taking the hits as there is little in the east contract that is better than the term sheet. They have many better provisions that it looks like will just be thrown out the window while Parker is saying things like the SLI will be a three way.
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
#20
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Maybe instead of just throwing terms like that around you should take the time to really understand what is happening. The most vocal complaints over this are from the WEST. The are the ones that will be taking the hits as there is little in the east contract that is better than the term sheet. They have many better provisions that it looks like will just be thrown out the window while Parker is saying things like the SLI will be a three way.
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
I know you are looking out for yourself and I get that. But stop and consider how you would feel if your CEO had spent the last few years taking advantage of your seniority fight and then let another union negotiate your future, with a 6 years contract?
I can assure you that the majority of AA pilots wouldn't openly CHOOSE to merge with you if we had another viable alternative. In fact, pilots will not decide if we do merge, but likely the other creditors and both carriers managements. Most think we WILL merge, but the question, is when. If AMR management fights off Parker and exits BK with their plan intact, then the CLA with Parker is moot and you can start your party then. As far as being "taken advantage of", I think that's a crock. USAPA has no one to blame but themselves. They're even more of an embarrassment then ALPA as a respectable bargaining agent for pilots and are the archetects of their present position.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Breton
Hangar Talk
0
06-24-2005 02:57 PM