Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
US Airways Exec: AMR Merger/Pilot Seniority >

US Airways Exec: AMR Merger/Pilot Seniority

Search

Notices

US Airways Exec: AMR Merger/Pilot Seniority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-2012, 07:16 AM
  #11  
doin time
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: RJ Left
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
No doubt PHX has been good for US, but I wonder what would happen to it when placed between a DFW fortress hub and the LAX focus. I personally don't think there is enough room for all three to survive long term. A combined US/AA will still have a large presence in PHX years to come, but it will dwindle. 5yrs after the merger i think it would be on the same level as CVG/MEM are for DAL
AA pilots on top, PHX closing, PHL being cut, sounds like doom and gloom eh? So, vote no on a joint contract? Dont accept a SLI?
slammer1906 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 11:16 AM
  #12  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,691
Default

Originally Posted by slammer1906
AA pilots on top, PHX closing, PHL being cut, sounds like doom and gloom eh? So, vote no on a joint contract? Dont accept a SLI?
No, it's all going to be ponies and rainbows for everyone. Forget I ever said anything.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 05:02 PM
  #13  
Working weekends
Thread Starter
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

My broken, inop, crystal ball predicts that these will be kept for sure

DFW
MIA
PHX
ORD
PHL

Others, I don't know. I say "above kept" because too much existing investment and infrastructure (and the bottom line, customer have become conditioned to them....) at these hubs. Harder to fold up the tent and pack it away than keep it and exploit its advantages.

What I see is more international expansion/coverage versus domestic. Maybe some more PHX to Hawaii, Vegas to Hawaii (not technically international but....), PHX to additional Mexico cities, etc stuff
satpak77 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 05:20 PM
  #14  
doin time
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: RJ Left
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
No, it's all going to be ponies and rainbows for everyone. Forget I ever said anything.
LMBO, ok, much better.
slammer1906 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 05:31 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77
My broken, inop, crystal ball predicts that these will be kept for sure

DFW
MIA
PHX
ORD
PHL

Others, I don't know. I say "above kept" because too much existing investment and infrastructure (and the bottom line, customer have become conditioned to them....) at these hubs. Harder to fold up the tent and pack it away than keep it and exploit its advantages.

What I see is more international expansion/coverage versus domestic. Maybe some more PHX to Hawaii, Vegas to Hawaii (not technically international but....), PHX to additional Mexico cities, etc stuff
I would think that CLT and DCA would be the prime assets of US to be guaranteed to survive a merger. DCA because of the prime location/customer base and value of all the slots. CLT because its the only game in town in the southeast aside from ATL. Though, I could see CLT losing a lot of its international flying, both to the islands and Europe. All just guesses though.
Errbus is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 05:43 PM
  #16  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,691
Default

Originally Posted by Errbus
I would think that CLT and DCA would be the prime assets of US to be guaranteed to survive a merger. DCA because of the prime location/customer base and value of all the slots. CLT because its the only game in town in the southeast aside from ATL. Though, I could see CLT losing a lot of its international flying, both to the islands and Europe. All just guesses though.
I agree. DCA is a great business market, and CLT would be a great domestic hub in the southeast. MIA just doesnt work for backwards connections (think JFK-MIA-SAV) and CLT could streamline things nicely.

Originally Posted by satpak77
My broken, inop, crystal ball predicts that these will be kept for sure

DFW
MIA
PHX
ORD
PHL

Others, I don't know. I say "above kept" because too much existing investment and infrastructure (and the bottom line, customer have become conditioned to them....) at these hubs. Harder to fold up the tent and pack it away than keep it and exploit its advantages.

What I see is more international expansion/coverage versus domestic. Maybe some more PHX to Hawaii, Vegas to Hawaii (not technically international but....), PHX to additional Mexico cities, etc stuff
No LGA?! AA literally put LGA on the map as a major NYC airport. And how about JFK, with the investments AA has made into T8. JFK is probably the most important airport in the country if you want to have a serious international presence. I cant see them giving that up.

Last edited by Flyby1206; 05-18-2012 at 06:11 PM.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 05:53 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
Default

JFK ain't going anywhere, neither is LGA. They won't grow (not that they're growing anyway) but they will definitely stick around.
aa73 is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 06:45 PM
  #18  
Working weekends
Thread Starter
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
JFK ain't going anywhere, neither is LGA. They won't grow (not that they're growing anyway) but they will definitely stick around.
good points, yes I missed those
satpak77 is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 12:16 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,794
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77
As for the seniority issue, Kirby said what Dave Bates, president of the Allied Pilots Association, already has said: The 2007 McCaskill-Bond statute creates a path to a resolution because it mandates binding arbitration.
Binding arbitration and USAPA?!?

Hilarious!
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 02:02 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Binding arbitration and USAPA?!?

Hilarious!
USAPA vaporizes with the merger. The arbitration he's referring to would be accepted by APA. In that case, there will be no hijackings of unions and those who disagree with the outcome would simply quit.
eaglefly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 06:02 PM
cactiboss
Major
64
05-01-2009 09:42 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
02-18-2008 07:49 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 09:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 12:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices