Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
This is why a US/AA merger wont work >

This is why a US/AA merger wont work

Search

Notices

This is why a US/AA merger wont work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2012, 12:46 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Default

No problem Tomahawk, with liking your company....I would say you're a bit extreme, though....You're proud to drink the AA cool-aid but remember, by definition "to drink cool-aid" means to be unrealistic or slavish...unthinking in loyalty to a certain "brand"...But "brand" in this case is a group of management individuals who think it is appropriate to try to take away from you (pilots) as much as they can possibly get away with in bancruptcy...-that is their "job"....it is a simple equation, -in their view, the less you (pilots) make in compensation and benefits the better it is for that entity you profess to love so much..."American Airlines". -Your "job"is to fly and try to preserve your profession and lifestyle, -not agree whole-heartedly with those whose purpose in bancruptcy is to gut your profession...

The "cool-aid" term originates, of course, with the mass suicide of the Rev. Jim Jones group in Guyana back in 1978. It implies a brainwashed, syncophantic group who are unhealthily compliant...worshipful, with whatever their leadership wants. At least take a balanced view...It appears the vast majority of your fellow pilots disagree with your stance on this issue....that should tell you something...Either you are an insightful, prescient genius of airline economics and are acting on that unbiased knowledge....or...you disregard the very questionable necessity of destroying the benefits of your chosen career to the maximal extent possible, just because "somebody says so"...and that "somebody" happens to have "American Airlines" associated with his name. You give all the impressions that the latter, and not the former is true, Tomahawk. -Any extreme view or favoritism on any side is not only unhealthy, but is likely unrealistic and untrue.

Prior to Parker's offer, I would have been one of those saying that the AA pilots would never in a hundred years agree to merge with US/AW...with that whole labor/SLI mess. But how can it be that labor peace and an actual increase in pay/benefits could be considered viable in bancruptcy? At the very, very least, Tomahawk, it should tell you Horton is going after way more than is necessary.... not because he "loves" American Airlines...-but, simply because he "can".

Last edited by wiggy; 05-14-2012 at 01:04 PM.
wiggy is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 01:07 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by wiggy
No problem Tomahawk, with liking your company....I would say you're a bit extreme, though....You're proud to drink the AA cool-aid but remember, by definition "to drink cool-aid" means to be unrealistic or slavish...unthinking in loyalty to a certain "brand"...But "brand" in this case is a group of management individuals who think it is appropriate to try to take away from you (pilots) as much as they can possibly get away with in bancruptcy...-that is their "job"....it is a simple equation, -in their view, the less you (pilots) make in compensation and benefits the better it is for that entity you profess to love so much..."American Airlines". -Your "job"is to fly and try to preserve your profession and lifestyle, -not agree whole-heartedly with those whose purpose in bancruptcy is to gut your profession...

The "cool-aid" term originates, of course, with the mass suicide of the Rev. Jim Jones group in Guyana back in 1978. It implies a brainwashed, syncophantic group who are unhealthily compliant...worshipful, with whatever their leadership wants. At least take a balanced view...It appears the vast majority of your fellow pilots disagree with your stance on this issue....that should tell you something...Either you are an insightful, prescient genius of airline economics and are acting on that unbiased knowledge....or...you disregard the very questionable necessity of destroying the benefits of your chosen career to the maximal extent possible, just because "somebody says so"...and that "somebody" happens to have "American Airlines" associated with his name. You give all the impressions that the latter, and not the former is true, Tomahawk. -Any extreme view or favoritism on any side is not only unhealthy, but is likely unrealistic and untrue.

Prior to Parker's offer, I would have been one of those saying that the AA pilots would never in a hundred years agree to merge with US/AW...with that whole labor/SLI mess. But how can it be that labor peace and an actual increase in pay/benefits could be considered viable in bancruptcy? At the very, very least, Tomahawk, it should tell you Horton is going after way more than is necessary.... not because he "loves" American Airlines...-but, simply because he "can".
Thanks for the history lesson
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 01:27 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Default

Yes, a history lesson that should make anyone who is "proud to drink cool-aid" -pause to think...perhaps better choices are made by using the faculty of "reason" rather than "blind faith".
wiggy is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:19 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
You don't appear to be interested in what's best for AA, you appear to want Horton to stay in power.

I'd love to hear why you think Horton's plan of not merging until later is better than merging now? Who gains from that? Does that really make AA stronger ASAP?
No, he's only interested in what he believes works for HIMSELF. We must remember who we're dealing with here. This is a person that not only has no interest in supporting his fellow pilots, he'd happily sell them out. He's the type of guy who walks through a picket line with a big smile and chest puffed out.

Thankfully, they're a VERY small minority in this profession.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:23 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
...........Loyalty, duty and honor are NOT traits of convenience.
I consider this a ridiculous statement, considering the source.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:25 PM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
T58 -

Horton's plan - 1420 less pilots by 2014(court testimony)

Parker's plan - keep all the pilots.


What "strong vision" are you thinking of?
Well, it WAS 400 pilots less, just like it was 400 million they needed, then 800 million, now 1.5 billion, etc., etc.

Can't trust anything from this source anymore as it changes day-by-day on a whim. No "loyalty, duty and honor" built with that.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 05:29 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
Thanks for the history lesson
Not that you'd learn form it.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 06:01 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
T58 -

Horton's plan - 1420 less pilots by 2014(court testimony)

Parker's plan - keep all the pilots.


What "strong vision" are you thinking of?
Parker's plan - keep all the pilots, or keep all the AA pilots? Been pretty quiet as to if the US pilot jobs are secure in this transaction or not. I could see PHL, PHX, and CLT all facing cuts for various reasons if the merger happens. Are these jobs safe or not?
lolwut is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 06:38 PM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Parker's plan - keep all the pilots, or keep all the AA pilots? Been pretty quiet as to if the US pilot jobs are secure in this transaction or not. I could see PHL, PHX, and CLT all facing cuts for various reasons if the merger happens. Are these jobs safe or not?
Don't get too worked up. Even if the merger were confirmed tomorrow, it would be 18 months at best to get any symmetry out of it. I'd expect most necessary adjustments to be made separately before any cohesion.

Don't be lured in by the grotesquely biased source here determined to upset the apple cart with disinformation.

Last edited by eaglefly; 05-14-2012 at 07:03 PM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-14-2012, 06:50 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MayDaze's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Parker's plan - keep all the pilots, or keep all the AA pilots? Been pretty quiet as to if the US pilot jobs are secure in this transaction or not. I could see PHL, PHX, and CLT all facing cuts for various reasons if the merger happens. Are these jobs safe or not?
I'm assuming you're asking about potentially working for US Airways. It is possible that a new hire could be furloughed later, but Airways attrition would make sure it wasn't for long.

It is very difficult to get hired by Airways right now. You have to be lucky(which there have been some), have connections or have an outstanding resume. In a few years it'll be another story.
MayDaze is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
A320fumes
Major
9
09-16-2010 09:11 AM
schwimmair
Regional
25
06-17-2010 11:54 PM
SWAjet
Major
8
03-26-2008 05:00 AM
RedBaron007
Regional
30
04-04-2007 09:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices