Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
AMR wants to increase revenue by a billion. >

AMR wants to increase revenue by a billion.

Search

Notices

AMR wants to increase revenue by a billion.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2012, 01:29 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Position: DAL
Posts: 623
Default

Wow--so all they have to do is say "we're increasing revenue by a billion."

That was easy.
More Bacon is offline  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:28 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor4life
They can put in all the RJ's they want as long as they are flown at mainline.
Yeap your right. Your avatar is the best to display for these sentiments. Being that ALPA caused the mess.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:42 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
avi8tor4life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 378
Default

You mean the pilots represented by Alpa caused this mess. Big difference. They decided. They turned them down.
avi8tor4life is offline  
Old 05-08-2012, 08:52 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Default

Full disclosure up front, I'm a B6 guy. Let's just say hypothetically AMR can't afford to buy JetBlue and they want to increase revenue by feeding their international market in JFK. They can't increase their domestic traffic at JFK because it is slot restricted. They can't add the Delta swarm of RJs at JFK because again they have no more slots, what's the problem with a B6 Codeshare at JFK alone to add high dollar revenue for AMR. Couldn't you put some scope restrictions on JFK with regard to a B6 partnership and increase your international feed...just saying, aren't you restricting profits when you can't organically grow your AMR traffic due to slot restrictions, but you could add revenue with a well defined Codeshare.
Clear Right is offline  
Old 05-09-2012, 03:53 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Full disclosure up front, I'm a B6 guy. Let's just say hypothetically AMR can't afford to buy JetBlue and they want to increase revenue by feeding their international market in JFK. They can't increase their domestic traffic at JFK because it is slot restricted. They can't add the Delta swarm of RJs at JFK because again they have no more slots, what's the problem with a B6 Codeshare at JFK alone to add high dollar revenue for AMR. Couldn't you put some scope restrictions on JFK with regard to a B6 partnership and increase your international feed...just saying, aren't you restricting profits when you can't organically grow your AMR traffic due to slot restrictions, but you could add revenue with a well defined Codeshare.
AMR basically wants unrestricted codesharing which means the end of the majority of AA pilots careers.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 05-09-2012, 04:35 AM
  #16  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,665
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Full disclosure up front, I'm a B6 guy. Let's just say hypothetically AMR can't afford to buy JetBlue and they want to increase revenue by feeding their international market in JFK. They can't increase their domestic traffic at JFK because it is slot restricted. They can't add the Delta swarm of RJs at JFK because again they have no more slots, what's the problem with a B6 Codeshare at JFK alone to add high dollar revenue for AMR. Couldn't you put some scope restrictions on JFK with regard to a B6 partnership and increase your international feed...just saying, aren't you restricting profits when you can't organically grow your AMR traffic due to slot restrictions, but you could add revenue with a well defined Codeshare.
AA doesn't make any real revenue on a Codeshare flight. Revenue isn't shared like in the BA/AA joint venture agreement.

If B6 did all the domestic connections for JFK then that would free up a bunch of AA slots that they could use for international expansion, but overall I agree with eaglefly and it could be a bad situation for AA/AE domestic ops in JFK
Flyby1206 is online now  
Old 05-09-2012, 06:55 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 533
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
AA doesn't make any real revenue on a Codeshare flight. Revenue isn't shared like in the BA/AA joint venture agreement.

If B6 did all the domestic connections for JFK then that would free up a bunch of AA slots that they could use for international expansion, but overall I agree with eaglefly and it could be a bad situation for AA/AE domestic ops in JFK
This is the problem I have with ALPA at B6. Think for a moment outside of the Legacy CBA mentality and put yourself in managements shoes. Just think of this as an intellectual exercise. Sometimes we don't see the forest through the trees because we don't trust management and we are worried about job protection, when the reality is you could be increasing jobs through more international traffic. Just bear with me and think about this scenario.

You can't increase domestic traffic because you are slot restricted at JFK. But your most valued revenue comes from your International JFK traffic. You want to add seat capacity at JFK with new 787s. But you need to fill the seats, so you Codeshare with JetBlue, not for domestic Codeshare profits, but to fill your International seat, adding much needed revenue.

Just don't allow the unrestricted Codeshare. Restrict it in negotiations to only Slot restricted airports where AMR can not add it's own domestic capacity. Everybody wins....maybe?
Clear Right is offline  
Old 05-09-2012, 07:58 AM
  #18  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,665
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Just don't allow the unrestricted Codeshare. Restrict it in negotiations to only Slot restricted airports where AMR can not add it's own domestic capacity. Everybody wins....maybe?
I agree 100%. In slot restricted airports like JFK it actually hurts AA to use a valuable slot for RJ service to an east coast city just so they can connect the dots for international pax. I could see AA still flying routes like LAX-JFK and MIA-JFK using widebodies, but stuff like JFK-BOS/DCA/ORD/RDU could be better served by B6 E190s. You would still have to figure out the issue with transferring pax between terminals quickly, but that can be accomplished.

Something like this would definitely require heavy duty contractual language, but it can be done through a CBA
Flyby1206 is online now  
Old 05-09-2012, 08:45 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by beeker
Why stop at a billion? Wouldn't a press release, "AMR wants to increase revenue by two Billion" be a better bigger positive headline for management? How about, "AMR wants to increase revenue by 1 billion and give a pony to every passenger and employee." Now that would be a good press release.

"AMR wants to increase revenue by 1 billion, switch all energy use to clean alternative power, end world hunger, create world peace and get every man woman and child a pony." That is what I would "want" to do as CEO of AMR, vote for me.
Oh wait, haven't you just described Mr Parker's position. He states publicly that he sees another 1.5-2.0 Billion in cost-savings and revenue increase all the while guaranteeing no furloughs, DAL-Plus payrates, putting a pony in every stable, etc.

Not many here taking him to task for his statement other than myself and a couple of other folks.....Hmmmmm!
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 05-09-2012, 08:57 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

The even greater irony or maybe it's hypocrisy is the willingness to accept Mr Parker at face value for his public statements even when his own house is divided, while deriding Mr Horton and his new team who's only been in the top job less then 6 months.

So compare the positions stated with the tenure. Tell us publicly why Mr Parker didn't offer his own team DAL rates 7 years ago? He's certainly been content to take the windfall resulting from the lack of combined contracts at US. Just what are the current pay rate differences between the West and East guys?

But many of you see him as the future savior of AA.....I'm not buying the hype.

Last edited by Tomahawk58; 05-09-2012 at 09:21 AM.
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redeye Pilot
United
4
12-15-2010 05:57 AM
EWRflyr
Major
57
09-23-2009 05:30 PM
jungle
Money Talk
3
12-03-2008 10:12 AM
Diesel 10
Major
2
08-05-2005 10:52 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
07-20-2005 01:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices