Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Leonidas speaks on the merger >

Leonidas speaks on the merger

Search

Notices

Leonidas speaks on the merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2012, 02:24 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default Leonidas speaks on the merger

For those not aware, Leonidas is the self funded west legal effort against the east pilot's.

Last Friday, April 20, 2012, US Airways management signed Conditional Labor Agreements (CLAs) and “Agreements of Support” with the three largest American Airlines labor unions in order to pursue a merger between the two airlines. These agreements represent significant steps toward US Airways’ goal of merging with American Airlines. Mr. Parker has apparently been in negotiations with the three unions for several months as the CLAs are quite well developed. As more details emerged, we, like you, learned that in addition to sewing up support from American’s three major unions, Mr. Parker has assembled a financial proposal which is sure to be competitive against American Airlines' CEO Tom Horton’s plan to emerge from bankruptcy as an independent airline.

The enthusiasm with which the Allied Pilots Association (APA) is promoting the possibility of a merger, and their eagerness to sign the contract offered to them by Doug Parker, should come as no surprise considering the alternative that is staring them in the face courtesy of the bankruptcy court: “In fact, if management implemented their 1113 motion, the APA leadership and its advisers believe that the APA pilots would have the worst labor contract in the US airline industry “(APA: “AA-US Airways, our best alternative”)

However, many of the provisions the APA has already tentatively agreed to with US Airways management amount to serious concessions from the America West Contract, and some sections may even be worse than LOA 93! In light of the unilateral nature of negotiations so far, this is understandable, but not at all acceptable. For instance, the AWA scheduling section is, in most respects, industry-leading and should not be discarded in the interest of expediency. The same is true with most other aspects of the West agreement, other than pay. But even West pay, due to the other provisions of our contract, is significantly higher than it appears at first glance. It is our impression that our former AWA management may have mislead the APA into thinking they are getting a great deal in their haste to come to an agreement. But, we believe most West pilots would view vast swaths of the APA Agreement with Doug Parker as major, unacceptable concessions.

We know many of you are wondering what impact this has on the seniority dispute. At this time, the answer is straightforward: nothing. In the not-to-distant future, these events will likely create the “painfully ripe” threshold which Judge Tashima set as a condition for the West pilots to pursue DFR II. To us at Leonidas, and we presume most West pilots as well, the West perspective of this proposed merger is that of curious observers. We have made it clear for almost five years now: The West will not be bullied into acquiescing or forfeiting our seniority rights. When the founders of USAPA removed our collective bargaining voice, they also permanently removed the possibility of a compromise. Hence, there is only one seniority list recognized by US Airways, and that remains the Nicolau. It matters not with whom we might merge, or how much (or little) money is on the table. If handled properly, we think this transaction has potential benefits for every pilot involved, but we will not sacrifice our rights to accommodate it at our expense. And, regardless of whether or not this transaction comes to fruition, we wish our colleagues at American Airlines nothing but the best. However, we must remain abundantly clear today, just as we have been all along: there remains is no ability (or desire) for the West to negotiate away any of the rights embodied in the Nicolau Award, and we will continue to vigorously defend those rights.

Since 2007, we have managed to fund the litigation necessary to defend our seniority rights all by ourselves, as we had no one else to rely on. Many of our pilots have contributed, and continue to give to support our plight even in the face of personal financial hardship. Most of our former AWA pilots continued to fund our litigation even as they were on furloughed status. We salute those who have stood up for yourselves, your families, your fellow AWA pilots, and the rule of law by giving sacrificially to Leonidas, LLC as we seek to protect all of our careers.

Thank you for your support!

Leonidas, LLC

http://www.cactuspilot.com
cactiboss is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 04:24 PM
  #2  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

mmmmmmmm Leonidas. yummy chocolates in Brussels. and actually at a good price too.
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 05:31 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
mmmmmmmm Leonidas. yummy chocolates in Brussels. and actually at a good price too.
And about as relevant to the proposed merger as this Leonidas.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 06:56 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,502
Default

Well, someone has to be a voice of reason. USAPA certainly isn't.

This is about having APA informed on what the West contract has. There have already been contacts made with APA, it is up to APA to follow through if they want to. Parker's minions certainly know the West contract and I am sure they would be happy to slide some concessions disguised as improvements into the APA Term Sheet. As the update states, Leonidas is an observer in this but we stand ready to intervene through the courts should USAPA try to pull more shenanigans. With the ruling on the Declaratory Judgement coming soon from Judge Silver most of the seniority list questions should go away.
cactusmike is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 07:20 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike
Well, someone has to be a voice of reason. USAPA certainly isn't.

This is about having APA informed on what the West contract has. There have already been contacts made with APA, it is up to APA to follow through if they want to. Parker's minions certainly know the West contract and I am sure they would be happy to slide some concessions disguised as improvements into the APA Term Sheet. As the update states, Leonidas is an observer in this but we stand ready to intervene through the courts should USAPA try to pull more shenanigans. With the ruling on the Declaratory Judgement coming soon from Judge Silver most of the seniority list questions should go away.
Cactus,

What are some of the specific things the West contract has that is better than what's in the AMR contract?
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 08:19 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
And about as relevant to the proposed merger as this Leonidas.
Led by an FO about 75 numbers from the bottom of the list.
FreighterGuyNow is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 10:34 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Speaking French
Posts: 385
Default

While I agree it's good to offer what ever info we can to the APA relating to our contract, I have a feeling they already have copies. They strike me as a very put together union, at least from what little I've seen. On a side note, I don't think they care if we lose some things on our contract, they are concerned with keeping what they have and anything additional is bonus. They have the numbers so ultimately they will decide. Not only are we outnumbered, but we are represented by USAPA, a union that couldn't find it's own @$$ with both hands and a map.
GQpilot is offline  
Old 04-27-2012, 01:25 AM
  #8  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Cactus,

What are some of the specific things the West contract has that is better than what's in the AMR contract?
!- More Vacation

2- More days off on reserve (13)

3- 100% cancellation pay

4- 5.15 min pay per day (even if you spend it on layover)

5- Full STD and 60% LTD till age 65

6- 10 more vacation days per year

7- Training pay, etc.

8- 100% dead head pay.

9- etc.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 04-27-2012, 04:11 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Enterprise's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 52
Default

It's the PDP of USAirways!

There are many disturbing aspects to the way this deal is playing out. As the guy at the PDP points out, many of these AIP are concessionary to the East and West. Negotiating a concessionary agreement behind the backs of your current employees is no way to foster unity and start out your new mega-carrier.

These issues are SUPPOSEDLY to be negotiated and finalized later. Personally, I view this as nothing more than an IOU from Dougweiser. Demands from 3 different groups over certain pet issues in the agreement, as well as the impending SLI have the potential to turn this whole venture into a train wreck faster than you can say "DWI".
Enterprise is offline  
Old 04-27-2012, 04:32 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: B-757/767 Capt.
Posts: 219
Default

OK, I give up. I can figure out IOU and DWI, even SLI but what is PDP and AIP. And why the code?
cubguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
RockBottom
American
70
04-24-2012 05:04 AM
Deez340
Mergers and Acquisitions
15
06-23-2008 05:40 AM
BigGuns
Mergers and Acquisitions
50
04-19-2008 05:22 AM
RedBaron007
Regional
30
04-04-2007 09:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices