Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Letter from APA to pilots on merger >

Letter from APA to pilots on merger

Search

Notices

Letter from APA to pilots on merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2012, 05:45 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Ahh, the management "spinmaster" is back. For AA labor, it's the only "love" they've felt in 10 years. Since then, it's been scorn, disregard, abuse, belittlement and any number of other negative interactions.

I suppose that's fault of the ENTIRE front-line labor at AA too, eh ?



I guess a wage increase doesn't count, but it's more then just a "little ole' wage increase". Considering the proper pay band placement of the A319's and A321's, the absence of gutting various International and night times, etc. and other things, it adds up to substantial differences. The DC plan details are still not specific, but bound to be at least equal. Scope is MUCH better then AMR's blank check of 250+ E-190's for Eagle and unlimited code-sharing that hands the rest of AA domestic over to others. E-190's with U stay at MAINLINE. My bet says Parker will be better with PBS (I've heard it's not so bad there, at least on the west side). In AMR's draconian hands, PBS would be a nightmare for pilots. Not worried about sick issues with this deal and job protection is positive vs. negative with AMR.

Perhaps Parker knows how to RUN an airline and thus might be able to make his plan work ?

Your attempt to gloss this down compared to AMR's "death sheet" is laughable, but let's say all the above baloney of yours isn't covered with green fur.

If that's the case, what does that say about an entire labor force so eager to abandon their current management, they'd take an equal deal from someone else ?

It says to me, the current management of this airline is SO far out of touch with their employees, they're not even in the same company. It also says, creditors and investors should seriously question ANY future crafted or controlled by those whose labor has abandoned them en masse, so easily.



Clearly you are not only anti-labor, but anti-APA as well as indicated by points 4-9 above. The only thing that has failed worse in the last 4 1/2 months worse then the handling of this bankruptcy, is your feeble attempt to protray yourself as just another "fellow pilot" looking to "discuss the issues". Your agenda (assigned or voluntary) is oozing from every pore.

We are where we are and AA employees have had enough. Parker didn't have to work all that hard to make this happen and that says everything. Clearly, if your bosses are anything like you, nothing's been learned and thus the show will go on as AA labor has nowhere to go but elsewhere.
You can always be counted on to apply the appropriate spin!

So, Doug did in fact offer his own pilots, FA's, FSC's and management team wages equivalent to AA and DAL prior to the (midnight hotel room meeting) with the APA leadership? We must have missed the announcement!

You are correct, I am in fact anti-APA BOD, at least the current BOD which has mis-served the membership. There's nothing wrong with stating that tough choices need to be made instead of placating the membership. Telling folks what they want to hear is NOT leadership!

The BOD chose to not pass on the offer on the table prior to BK. Of course they're smarter than the membership at large. Strangely enough, what's being offered by Doug if you can call it that, is eerily similar to AA's offer prior to the BK filing. Let's not let facts stand in the way of an agenda.

It funny that you mention the whole work force, when on this forum, you stated time and again that the other work groups don't matter to the pilots. A little bit of revisionist history I guess.

I like how suddenly the APA BOD is all buddy-buddy with the other employees when it suits their aim, otherwise, there isn't much love for the FA's, FSC's and even lowly-paid middle managers that work hard to keep AA strong.

This board is infested with know-it-all's who really should be out running their own airlines. Oh wait, you wouldn't be able to whine then!

Those who believe they're "entitled" will never believe otherwise!
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 05:57 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
Default

Originally Posted by tomahawk58
you are correct, i am in fact anti-apa bod, at least the current bod which has mis-served the membership.
No Way!! NO WAY!!!!
aa73 is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 06:06 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
You can always be counted on to apply the appropriate spin!
Isn't it interestig I'm not selling anything on this forum ?

You seem to be though. It would appear that the deals with Parker are selling themselves and for good reason.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
So, Doug did in fact offer his own pilots, FA's, FSC's and management team wages equivalent to AA and DAL prior to the (midnight hotel room meeting) with the APA leadership? We must have missed the announcement!
Still a bit early to sharpshoot irrelevent details, but this pointless statement surprises me not.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
You are correct, I am in fact anti-APA BOD, at least the current BOD which has mis-served the membership. There's nothing wrong with stating that tough choices need to be made instead of placating the membership. Telling folks what they want to hear is NOT leadership!
"Tough choices" like blindly accepting the wholesale destruction of the pilot group and following this managments blind promises of...........nothing ?

Thanks, but no thanks.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
The BOD chose to not pass on the offer on the table prior to BK. Of course they're smarter than the membership at large. Strangely enough, what's being offered by Doug if you can call it that, is eerily similar to AA's offer prior to the BK filing. Let's not let facts stand in the way of an agenda.
There's a VERY good reason they did. That didn't matter anyway, as A. it would have been shot down by the membership as especially the scope clauses were a death sentence and B. AMR declared BK before any vote would have taken place.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
It funny that you mention the whole work force, when on this forum, you stated time and again that the other work groups don't matter to the pilots. A little bit of revisionist history I guess.
OK, now this is beyond misrepresentation, it is an out-and-out LIE. I defy you to show me any post of mine where I state other AA employees "don't matter". I guess when you have no argument or have run out of one, you resort to this tactic. I can't say I'm surprised. You are slithering now, shedding your skin.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
I like how suddenly the APA BOD is all buddy-buddy with the other employees when it suits their aim, otherwise, there isn't much love for the FA's, FSC's and even lowly-paid middle managers that work hard to keep AA strong.
Actually, the fact the entire 3 front-line labor unions are working AS ONE is inspiring. I think that going forward, they SHOULD act as one. Your attempt to drive a wedge between the 3 labor groups is another demonstration of your serpentine wiggle.

Originally Posted by Tomhawk58
This board is infested with know-it-all's who really should be out running their own airlines. Oh wait, you wouldn't be able to whine then!
If you don't like what this board has to offer, feel free to leave. YOU came here specifically to find fertile ground to peddle your anti-union/anti-pilot rhetoric and you've failed miserably. Now, it is you doing the most whining when developments have gone in predicatble directions that you dislike.

Personally I'd get used to it, as unless AMR truly changes their colors, it's going to get worse if you ask me.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 06:18 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

There are two thing things I admire, one is passion and the other is loyalty. I'm sorry but midnight affairs have never set well with me! The "supposedly lover" never says anything except how easy all will be; sounds familiar doesn't it!

One of the things I've always admired about the ex-TWA group is their almost rabid-like love for their former company, even after 3 trips through BK. This fickleness that seem to inhabit this forum must be the purview of the young and the not-so-young who've come to the airlines with wanderlust and entitlement as their primary motivational drivers.

So Eaglefly and others, just what did US, DAL, NWA, CO and UAL achieve in BK? Given US's double visit in the past decade, what promise has Doug given during his hotel stay that we wont be back there again in the not to distant future? OF course, during any affair, the promise is for happiness ever after. It's only in the light of day that reality become apparent!

I never have and never will apologize for being a die-hard AAer!
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 06:22 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Isn't it interestig I'm not selling anything on this forum ?

You seem to be though. It would appear that the deals with Parker are selling themselves and for good reason.



Still a bit early to sharpshoot irrelevent details, but this pointless statement surprises me not.



"Tough choices" like blindly accepting the wholesale destruction of the pilot group and following this managments blind promises of...........nothing ?

Thanks, but no thanks.



There's a VERY good reason they did. That didn't matter anyway, as A. it would have been shot down by the membership as especially the scope clauses were a death sentence and B. AMR declared BK before any vote would have taken place.



OK, now this is beyond misrepresentation, it is an out-and-out LIE. I defy you to show me any post of mine where I state other AA employees "don't matter". I guess when you have no argument or have run out of one, you resort to this tactic. I can't say I'm surprised. You are slithering now, shedding your skin.



Actually, the fact the entire 3 front-line labor unions are working AS ONE is inspiring. I think that going forward, they SHOULD act as one. Your attempt to drive a wedge between the 3 labor groups is another demonstration of your serpentine wiggle.



If you don't like what this board has to offer, feel free to leave. YOU came here specifically to find fertile ground to peddle your anti-union/anti-pilot rhetoric and you've failed miserably. Now, it is you doing the most whining when developments have gone in predicatble directions that you dislike.

Personally I'd get used to it, as unless AMR truly changes their colors, it's going to get worse if you ask me.
I really like how you purposely chose to defend the APA BOD, but left absence any defense of the US employees that have labored just as hard to secure something they deemed just as if not more meaningful!

Speaks volumes! You're right, it's all about what we AA pilots are "entitled" to! It's unthinkable that anything or anyone else gets in the way of what we deserve!.
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 06:46 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
There are two thing things I admire, one is passion and the other is loyalty. I'm sorry but midnight affairs have never set well with me! The "supposedly lover" never says anything except how easy all will be; sounds familiar doesn't it!

One of the things I've always admired about the ex-TWA group is their almost rabid-like love for their former company, even after 3 trips through BK. This fickleness that seem to inhabit this forum must be the purview of the young and the not-so-young who've come to the airlines with wanderlust and entitlement as their primary motivational drivers.
I always say loyalty is a good thing..............taken in moderation.

Ohh......and blind loyalty to those who have stiffed you time and again is not something I admire. Loyalty is a concept that is earned.

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
So Eaglefly and others, just what did US, DAL, NWA, CO and UAL achieve in BK?
Ummm...........profitability ?

Last edited by eaglefly; 04-22-2012 at 06:57 PM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 06:56 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
I really like how you purposely chose to defend the APA BOD, but left absence any defense of the US employees that have labored just as hard to secure something they deemed just as if not more meaningful!

Speaks volumes! You're right, it's all about what we AA pilots are "entitled" to! It's unthinkable that anything or anyone else gets in the way of what we deserve!.
I really like how you deliberately lie on this forum claiming I make statements I didn't, evade direct questions like one asked previously (and repeatedly) to explain in detail why AMR's business plan is superior and then twist others comments into places they are irrelevent in an attempt to bolster your credibility, the last part being above where you imply a defense of the APA BOD as an attack against others.

If I hadn't educated myself on union-busting tactics, this would all sound convincing, but alas, with a little education in that area, it just looks like the silly, convoluted and absurd gibberish it really is.

Do they run that part as a seperate class or is it just a handout with a pop-quiz in the back ?

You failed that course, if you ask me.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 06:58 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Eaglefly,

Everything you and others seems to ascribe to Doug and Scott, you entirely dismiss in Tom whose been in the job since 11/29/11! I find that quite interesting.

You appear so ready to go all in with a "lover" that's left his own "wife" stranded but because he says this one will be different, you and others are ready to chuck it all on a promise!

You are ready to dismiss a plan of reorganization that you haven't even seen from either Tom's team not to mention Doug's. I know, the "lover" made a promise, so it must be true.

You want to call me a management apologist for being a strong AAer, so be it.

I like the way you frame things: "don't believe anyone that doesn't tell you what you want to hear"!

Have you ever considered starting your own airline? What would your model look like, How much would you pay your pilots, FA's and other employees, What would your revenue strategy look like, and how would you compete in the marketplace?

How posting a business plan that would pay the most and be consistently profitable.

It's easy to post on a forum, that includes me, but actually running a sustainable airline is quite another matter indeed. Doug know that, and he'll play anyone to achieve his aim.
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 07:01 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I always say loyalty is a good thing..............taken in moderation.

Ohh......and blind loyalty to those who have stiffed you time and again is not something I admire. Loyalty is a concept that is earned.



Ummm...........profitability ?
So the fact that AA is attempting to do the same thing (achieve sustained profitability) through restructuring is lost on you an others?

Why then does the APA leadership say in their public statement that it's better to merge with US in BK unlike DAL or UAL?
Tomahawk58 is offline  
Old 04-22-2012, 07:10 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Tomahawk58
Eaglefly,

Everything you and others seems to ascribe to Doug and Scott, you entirely dismiss in Tom whose been in the job since 11/29/11! I find that quite interesting.

You appear so ready to go all in with a "lover" that's left his own "wife" stranded but because he says this one will be different, you and others are ready to chuck it all on a promise!

You are ready to dismiss a plan of reorganization that you haven't even seen from either Tom's team not to mention Doug's. I know, the "lover" made a promise, so it must be true.

You want to call me a management apologist for being a strong AAer, so be it.

I like the way you frame things: "don't believe anyone that doesn't tell you what you want to hear"!

Have you ever considered starting your own airline? What would your model look like, How much would you pay your pilots, FA's and other employees, What would your revenue strategy look like, and how would you compete in the marketplace?

How posting a business plan that would pay the most and be consistently profitable.

It's easy to post on a forum, that includes me, but actually running a sustainable airline is quite another matter indeed. Doug know that, and he'll play anyone to achieve his aim.
Tom........I think it's time you strapped in, buddy. You're an army of one and not on the side of any of the employees. Judging from tonights contributions by yourself alone, you've demonstrated evasion, irrelevancy, attempted confusion, misapplication and outright lying. I think you've been hanging around with a negative crowd, my man and have picked up a lot of bad habits.

I'm sorry you can't accept that the emperor has no clothes. It would seem the majority have finally figuered that out.
eaglefly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 08:33 PM
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 08:41 PM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 09:12 AM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 10:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices