Letter from APA to pilots on merger
#21
BTW, AA has been the ugly girl at the prom noone wanted to dance with ever since UA/CO, SW/AT and DL/NW hooked up. They didn't get that way overnight, either! You reap what you sew...
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
If Horton wants leverage and momentum back, he'll have to deflate his credibility, soften his "steep spine" and offer ALL mainline labor something of substance.
Even with that, I can't see trust EVER returning. Of course, he could go "Kmer Rouge" and turn AA into a 1970's Cambodia tyranny state, but what message is sent to creditors and investors ?
He's got a big problem.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
As usual, your blind hatred for anything related to AA causes you to spew your emotional blather in any direction hoping that some of it might make sense. It doesn't.
PS... how do you sew what you reap?
757200ER, your new theme song is, "Ramble On" Led Zeppelin
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Actually AA was in talks with NWA, UAL and CAL for merging prior to those carriers choosing an other at the dance. If I am not mistaken, AA and US Airways talked about merger before when everyone else was french kissing.
AA was something when Crandall was here, ever since his retirement AA/AMR has been second rate EXCEPT in the employee ranks.
AA was something when Crandall was here, ever since his retirement AA/AMR has been second rate EXCEPT in the employee ranks.
#25
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
You are the only one I know who says this. Everyone in the industry labelled USAir as such. Hey, I'm not saying AA is very pretty today, but it's kind of telling when it's USAir who's been actively courting everyone in the industry for the past 5 years - not AA. It's also kind of telling when industry analysts point out that it's USAir who needs AA more than AA needs USAir.
As usual, your blind hatred for anything related to AA causes you to spew your emotional blather in any direction hoping that some of it might make sense. It doesn't.
PS... how do you sew what you reap?
757200ER, your new theme song is, "Ramble On" Led Zeppelin
As usual, your blind hatred for anything related to AA causes you to spew your emotional blather in any direction hoping that some of it might make sense. It doesn't.
PS... how do you sew what you reap?
757200ER, your new theme song is, "Ramble On" Led Zeppelin
They had 18-24 months to get to the financial point of the other carriers at their loss rate and the ONLY point of this whole mess, is the interest in crushing labor costs. They would have been happy to manipulate the broken negotiation process under the absentee landlords of the NMB for another 2 years, but senior pilot retirmement increases and the possible parking of 767's and 777's and destroying even more premium customer loyalty and lost market share boxed them into a corner and they jumped earlier then planned.
No doubt the C11 was planned as far back as early summer, but AMR was planning more along the lines of this fall to administer the coup-de-grace to labor.
Now look at 'em.
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Actually AA was in talks with NWA, UAL and CAL for merging prior to those carriers choosing an other at the dance. If I am not mistaken, AA and US Airways talked about merger before when everyone else was french kissing.
AA was something when Crandall was here, ever since his retirement AA/AMR has been second rate EXCEPT in the employee ranks.
AA was something when Crandall was here, ever since his retirement AA/AMR has been second rate EXCEPT in the employee ranks.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Now that the hype has started to wane just a bit, let's take a dispassionate look at where things stand:
1. You have to really love a CEO whose willing to engage in a midnight tryst with the APA, then promise them DAL + 3 percent but won't bring his own pilots, FA's and FSC's together let alone bring their wages and benefits up to AA's standards; forget DAL's! (APA said they got more down in a week than 5 years. How long have you US folks been trying with Doug?)
2. Aside from a small wage increase, Doug promise very little above what AA is currently proposing in the term sheets before the courts.
- Identical DC plans (the cards are shuffled slightly but the amount comes out virtually the same.
- Scope is virtually the same in both proposals - the commuters get 1/2 the number of ac as the mainline in either proposal.
- PBS is on both lists.
- Sick is actually even more restrictive at US. Our pilots currently top 9 percent on the sick list on any given day. Nothing like helping the company that pays our salary. Nah, sitting home and whining is much better.
- Job protection. Let see, we AA pilots come out the best with about 400 job cuts, but when you factor in deliveries, the number will probably be even smaller. Does anyone seriously believe Doug will carry an additional 30,000 employees in a post-merger AA/US relative to DAL and UAL?
3. Interestingly enough, the APA has pulled out all the stops to sell what is essentially, a modest pay raise by attempting to cast their lot with Doug.
4. The height of hubris in my opinion is the APA's position that we (AA) are better off to merge during the BK process. I guess those DAL folks didn't have a clue as to what they were doing by telling Doug thanks but no!
5. If anyone believes the APA and Doug attempted to cut a back room deal because they're concern about the employees at US, don't kid yourself.
6. We keep believing absent a sustained profitable model at AA, US or any public company worth anything we can continue to operate.
7. The ultimate irony is that the US folks on this board and some AA guys with their own agendas discounts US's 2 trips down BK lane, along with DAL, NWA, CO and UAL BK visits, but takes AA to task for getting its cost under control across the entire company. Every single employee at AA is impacted by this not just us pilots!
8. Many on this forum have never allowed fact to stand up to emotion!
9. AA will present it's POR by 9/28/12. Doug has not presented anything yet other than hollow promises backed up he hopes by AA's cash! Sort like a man attempting to steal another's wife then asking the wife to take the husband's money so the two of them can live happily ever after. Well, it sometime works in the movies, but real life is another story altogether.
Those who believe they are "entitled" will always feel that way!
1. You have to really love a CEO whose willing to engage in a midnight tryst with the APA, then promise them DAL + 3 percent but won't bring his own pilots, FA's and FSC's together let alone bring their wages and benefits up to AA's standards; forget DAL's! (APA said they got more down in a week than 5 years. How long have you US folks been trying with Doug?)
2. Aside from a small wage increase, Doug promise very little above what AA is currently proposing in the term sheets before the courts.
- Identical DC plans (the cards are shuffled slightly but the amount comes out virtually the same.
- Scope is virtually the same in both proposals - the commuters get 1/2 the number of ac as the mainline in either proposal.
- PBS is on both lists.
- Sick is actually even more restrictive at US. Our pilots currently top 9 percent on the sick list on any given day. Nothing like helping the company that pays our salary. Nah, sitting home and whining is much better.
- Job protection. Let see, we AA pilots come out the best with about 400 job cuts, but when you factor in deliveries, the number will probably be even smaller. Does anyone seriously believe Doug will carry an additional 30,000 employees in a post-merger AA/US relative to DAL and UAL?
3. Interestingly enough, the APA has pulled out all the stops to sell what is essentially, a modest pay raise by attempting to cast their lot with Doug.
4. The height of hubris in my opinion is the APA's position that we (AA) are better off to merge during the BK process. I guess those DAL folks didn't have a clue as to what they were doing by telling Doug thanks but no!
5. If anyone believes the APA and Doug attempted to cut a back room deal because they're concern about the employees at US, don't kid yourself.
6. We keep believing absent a sustained profitable model at AA, US or any public company worth anything we can continue to operate.
7. The ultimate irony is that the US folks on this board and some AA guys with their own agendas discounts US's 2 trips down BK lane, along with DAL, NWA, CO and UAL BK visits, but takes AA to task for getting its cost under control across the entire company. Every single employee at AA is impacted by this not just us pilots!
8. Many on this forum have never allowed fact to stand up to emotion!
9. AA will present it's POR by 9/28/12. Doug has not presented anything yet other than hollow promises backed up he hopes by AA's cash! Sort like a man attempting to steal another's wife then asking the wife to take the husband's money so the two of them can live happily ever after. Well, it sometime works in the movies, but real life is another story altogether.
Those who believe they are "entitled" will always feel that way!
Last edited by Tomahawk58; 04-22-2012 at 04:42 PM.
#29
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Now that the hype has started to wane just a bit, let's take a dispassionate look at where things stand:
1. You have to really love a CEO whose willing to engage in a midnight tryst with the APA, then promise them DAL + 3 percent but won't bring his own pilots, FA's and FSC's together let alone bring their wages and benefits up to AA's standards; forget DAL's! (APA said they got more down in a week than 5 years. How long have you US folks been trying with Doug?)
1. You have to really love a CEO whose willing to engage in a midnight tryst with the APA, then promise them DAL + 3 percent but won't bring his own pilots, FA's and FSC's together let alone bring their wages and benefits up to AA's standards; forget DAL's! (APA said they got more down in a week than 5 years. How long have you US folks been trying with Doug?)
I suppose that's fault of the ENTIRE front-line labor at AA too, eh ?
2. Aside from a small wage increase, Doug promise very little above what AA is currently proposing in the term sheets before the courts.
- Identical DC plans (the cards are shuffled slightly but the amount comes out virtually the same.
- Scope is virtually the same in both proposals - the commuters get 1/2 the number of ac as the mainline in either proposal.
- PBS is on both lists.
- Sick is actually even more restrictive at US. Our pilots currently top 9 percent on the sick list on any given day. Nothing like helping the company that pays our salary. Nah, sitting home and whining is much better.
- Job protection. Let see, we AA pilots come out the best with about 400 job cuts, but when you factor in deliveries, the number will probably be even smaller. Does anyone seriously believe Doug will carry an additional 30,000 employees in a post-merger AA/US relative to DAL and UAL?
- Identical DC plans (the cards are shuffled slightly but the amount comes out virtually the same.
- Scope is virtually the same in both proposals - the commuters get 1/2 the number of ac as the mainline in either proposal.
- PBS is on both lists.
- Sick is actually even more restrictive at US. Our pilots currently top 9 percent on the sick list on any given day. Nothing like helping the company that pays our salary. Nah, sitting home and whining is much better.
- Job protection. Let see, we AA pilots come out the best with about 400 job cuts, but when you factor in deliveries, the number will probably be even smaller. Does anyone seriously believe Doug will carry an additional 30,000 employees in a post-merger AA/US relative to DAL and UAL?
Perhaps Parker knows how to RUN an airline and thus might be able to make his plan work vs. simply just emasculating your labor for profits ?
Your attempt to gloss this down compared to AMR's "death sheet" is laughable, but let's say all the above baloney of yours isn't covered with green fur.
If that's the case, what does that say about an entire labor force so eager to abandon their current management, they'd take an equal deal from someone else ?
It says to me, the current management of this airline is SO far out of touch with their employees, they're not even in the same company. It also says to me, creditors and investors should seriously question ANY future crafted or controlled by those whose labor has abandoned them en masse, so easily. It isn't the best deal, by far, simply the best OPTION considering the situation.
3. Interestingly enough, the APA has pulled out all the stops to sell what is essentially, a modest pay raise by attempting to cast their lot with Doug.
4. The height of hubris in my opinion is the APA's position that we (AA) are better off to merge during the BK process. I guess those DAL folks didn't have a clue as to what they were doing by telling Doug thanks but no!
5. If anyone believes the APA and Doug attempted to cut a back room deal because they're concern about the employees at US, don't kid yourself.
6. We keep believing absent a sustained profitable model at AA, US or any public company worth anything we can continue to operate.
7. The ultimate irony is that the US folks on this board and some AA guys with their own agendas discounts US's 2 trips down BK lane, along with DAL, NWA, CO and UAL BK visits, but takes AA to task for getting its cost under control across the entire company. Every single employee at AA is impacted by this not just us pilots!
8. Many on this forum have never allowed fact to stand up to emotion!
9. AA will present it's POR by 9/28/12. Doug has not presented anything yet other than hollow promises backed up he hopes by AA's cash! Sort like a man attempting to steal another's wife then asking the wife to take the husband's money so the two of them can live happily ever after. Well, it sometime works in the movies, but real life is another story altogether.
Those who believe they are "entitled" will always feel that way!
4. The height of hubris in my opinion is the APA's position that we (AA) are better off to merge during the BK process. I guess those DAL folks didn't have a clue as to what they were doing by telling Doug thanks but no!
5. If anyone believes the APA and Doug attempted to cut a back room deal because they're concern about the employees at US, don't kid yourself.
6. We keep believing absent a sustained profitable model at AA, US or any public company worth anything we can continue to operate.
7. The ultimate irony is that the US folks on this board and some AA guys with their own agendas discounts US's 2 trips down BK lane, along with DAL, NWA, CO and UAL BK visits, but takes AA to task for getting its cost under control across the entire company. Every single employee at AA is impacted by this not just us pilots!
8. Many on this forum have never allowed fact to stand up to emotion!
9. AA will present it's POR by 9/28/12. Doug has not presented anything yet other than hollow promises backed up he hopes by AA's cash! Sort like a man attempting to steal another's wife then asking the wife to take the husband's money so the two of them can live happily ever after. Well, it sometime works in the movies, but real life is another story altogether.
Those who believe they are "entitled" will always feel that way!
We are where we are and AA employees have had enough. Parker didn't have to work all that hard to make this happen and that says everything. Clearly, if your bosses are anything like you, nothing's been learned and thus the show will go on as AA labor has nowhere to go but elsewhere. As far as "entitlement"..........well, there's an old saying in business and that's "you don't get what you deserve, you get what you NEGOTIATE".
Since Parker was willing to negotiate and AMR isn't, this is where we are. AMR hasn't negotiated in 5 years..........perhaps they forgot how ?
Last edited by eaglefly; 04-22-2012 at 05:44 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post