Value of USAir merger?
#31
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
#33
Though I'm also not sure that AA + LCC = "top dog"
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: A319/20/21 FO
Posts: 292
1. I think there is very likely a deal. When it happens, AA will be the surviving name though much of the US corporate structure will likely survive. I think Parker is the CEO of the combined airline, HQ is in DFW, and management is a mix of both carriers.
2. The US hubs are not so worthless as some would have you believe. PHL is an enormous profit center for US, and the international network there has the kind of feed that AA can only dream of at JFK. While New York has more O&D, it is structurally impossible for AA to get the kind of network feed it would need to get PHL-like financials through organic growth. There just isn't space there.
3. DCA is one of US's most profitable operations, and the slot transaction only increases the size of the operation there. AA has always been a distant third behind US and DL at DCA, and they'll now be an even more distant #2 behind a larger US presence there. Plus, AA has coveted the Shuttle for years.
4. CLT is the only hub airport that is geographically competitive with Atlanta, and enables convenient connectivity to a lot of places that are a stretch from hubs in the Northeast, Midwest, or Florida. There is also an enormous amount of corporate business there (especially the banks) and that is growing ... Chiquita just left CVG for CLT, thank in large part to the US hub there and the severe reduction in service at CVG after the NW/DL merger.
There's a lot more pushing FOR a transaction than pushing AGAINST it. Any way you slice it, we live in interesting times ...
2. The US hubs are not so worthless as some would have you believe. PHL is an enormous profit center for US, and the international network there has the kind of feed that AA can only dream of at JFK. While New York has more O&D, it is structurally impossible for AA to get the kind of network feed it would need to get PHL-like financials through organic growth. There just isn't space there.
3. DCA is one of US's most profitable operations, and the slot transaction only increases the size of the operation there. AA has always been a distant third behind US and DL at DCA, and they'll now be an even more distant #2 behind a larger US presence there. Plus, AA has coveted the Shuttle for years.
4. CLT is the only hub airport that is geographically competitive with Atlanta, and enables convenient connectivity to a lot of places that are a stretch from hubs in the Northeast, Midwest, or Florida. There is also an enormous amount of corporate business there (especially the banks) and that is growing ... Chiquita just left CVG for CLT, thank in large part to the US hub there and the severe reduction in service at CVG after the NW/DL merger.
There's a lot more pushing FOR a transaction than pushing AGAINST it. Any way you slice it, we live in interesting times ...
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
I see this as a merger in the making and the script isn't very hard to read. I see one more critical piece to the puzzle though and thats JB. A 3 way merger, possibly with a mini fragmentation/asset sale thrown in and AA coming out as a mega carrier again appear to be manifest destiny rather than an obscure theory. I can't see it not happening.
#36
My opinion...USAir has nothing that AA needs. This bankruptcy is about AAs debt and the pensions. I don't think they will merge with anyone. They will emerge in a year or so leaner and with no pensions, and will be a tougher competitor. I wish their pilots the best. Nothing they could have done would have prevented ch 11.
At 0.40 cents a share and 336M shares outstanding, anyone with 134M in their pocket, cash or financed, can own complete control of AMR.
By the way my preliminary research doesn't show (from a takeover standpoint) any revolutionary difference between the current situation at AA and the one when AA and TWA merged. I think the issues are the same.
#37
Whether AA can stop Doug is another thing. I know that the pilots had a little influence, but that that should not be overblown in its' importance. tT had way more to do with how the creditors were paid off by the front office than our participation. If that merger does happen as two independent entities however, I sincerely wish all those involved the very best.
#38
Overall, I would so no to a merger. I would imagine that there would be a lot of fighting between the unions (i.e. US East vs West). Throwing a third pilot union into the mix would surely add to the turmoil. Then add the F/A's, mechanics, ground workers and whatever other represented work groups there are and there be even more fighting. That is if the similar work groups are all represented by different unions.
#39
Seriously? With all the dysfunction at US, to throw AMR into the mix is like throwing gasoline in a bonfire... I seriously doubt if a successful integration would ever happen, but who am I other than an outside observer. And FWIW, I do not think DAL guys are at the top of ANY heap, but watching the bloodletting that will occur in a US/AMR merger does not particularly fill me with any fear about being "passed" by THAT resultant group, whatever that means.
#40
If US buys the assets of American, because they are in ch11,...like TWA was, would the AA pilots get stapled to the bottom of the US sen list.
Isn't that what happened at TWA?
OK now pass the popcorn.... this is gonna get good!
Isn't that what happened at TWA?
OK now pass the popcorn.... this is gonna get good!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post