Search

Notices

Value of USAir merger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2011, 06:11 AM
  #101  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
When I said the Nic award is out with a merger, I'm referring to the integration of the AA pilots. If the east and west are not integrated at the time of merger, then there will have to be new talks to get all pilots integrated. AA pilots are not part of the Nic award. So that's why if its not in place by time of merger, I would see it being nil. See what I'm trying to get at?
Here's the rub with your assessment.

USAPA will have to present a seniority list if and when an AA merger takes place. If the DJ rules in favor of the companies position then the Nic will be the list that represents the USAirways pilots in any SLI. The company will not be willing to accept the liability in ignoring Judge Silver's ruling.

If the DJ rules in some other direction and USAPA uses a DOH/LOS list for the SLI in a theoretical AA merger, then they (Leonidas) will have a "ripe" DFR ready for the picking. With a likely injunction quickly in place.

The only real question, is how long it takes to reach the same outcome?
JimmyJim is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 07:48 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
When I said the Nic award is out with a merger, I'm referring to the integration of the AA pilots. If the east and west are not integrated at the time of merger, then there will have to be new talks to get all pilots integrated. AA pilots are not part of the Nic award. So that's why if its not in place by time of merger, I would see it being nil. See what I'm trying to get at?
Yes, I see. But, in a legal sense, just because the pilots aren't flying together doesn't mean they aren't integrated. That "nic" list is an integrated seniority list and from what cacti is saying, it seems like that is the list that would be submitted for any subsequent SLI.
newKnow is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 09:37 AM
  #103  
Senior by choice
 
formerdal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Yes, I see. But, in a legal sense, just because the pilots aren't flying together doesn't mean they aren't integrated. That "nic" list is an integrated seniority list and from what cacti is saying, it seems like that is the list that would be submitted for any subsequent SLI.

The NIC only becomes a valid seniority list with a joint contract in place! If that were not the case they would be abiding by it now. If a merger happens prior to a joint list while the contracts are still seperate then yes, their would need to be a new integration method applied...
formerdal is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 09:47 AM
  #104  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
When I said the Nic award is out with a merger, I'm referring to the integration of the AA pilots. If the east and west are not integrated at the time of merger, then there will have to be new talks to get all pilots integrated. AA pilots are not part of the Nic award. So that's why if its not in place by time of merger, I would see it being nil. See what I'm trying to get at?
Yeah I understand your point. There is one seniority list accepted in writing at usair and that is the nicolau award, it awaits only a single contract to be implemented. Look at it this way, if there is a merger, is it a 3 way aw/u/aa or is it a 2 way lcc/aa?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 09:53 AM
  #105  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by formerdal
The NIC only becomes a valid seniority list with a joint contract in place! If that were not the case they would be abiding by it now.
Yup

If a merger happens prior to a joint list while the contracts are still seperate then yes, their would need to be a new integration method applied...
So we would have a 3 way list starting from scratch? So the u/awa merger never happen. Our legal counsel believes otherwise, a "unquestionably ripe dfr" would follow.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 10:31 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by formerdal
The NIC only becomes a valid seniority list with a joint contract in place! If that were not the case they would be abiding by it now. If a merger happens prior to a joint list while the contracts are still seperate then yes, their would need to be a new integration method applied...
Thanks Dal,

I guess I misunderstood what cacti was saying.....
newKnow is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 11:09 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff
Just read an article that said AMERICAN would be better off after merger to US Air??? That doesn't make sense to me...

cliff
ANC
I think they mean the combined company, in the long run, would be better off. I would agree with that for many reasons. Consolidation is good for everyone because it removes one more competitor. It provides the opportunity to dump significant amounts of regional capacity that is still lingering around from the RJ heydays where everyone built up a massive RJ network just to raid everyone's markets with insanely high frequency. The combined network would be better for both airlines as that is one of the biggest structural weaknesses of both airlines right now in the first place.

Put the two route maps together, remove a competitor, reduce capacity further which pushes up pricing power and control more marketshare. What's not to like. If the seniority lists could be integrated somewhat fairly it would be a win for the pilot groups as well. Not only would they be at a healthier company in the long run, the combined retirements would be staggering. Of course if the other group doesn't get stapled than your group got royally screwed, etc.
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 11:29 AM
  #108  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I think they mean the combined company, in the long run, would be better off. I would agree with that for many reasons. Consolidation is good for everyone because it removes one more competitor. It provides the opportunity to dump significant amounts of regional capacity that is still lingering around from the RJ heydays where everyone built up a massive RJ network just to raid everyone's markets with insanely high frequency. The combined network would be better for both airlines as that is one of the biggest structural weaknesses of both airlines right now in the first place.

Put the two route maps together, remove a competitor, reduce capacity further which pushes up pricing power and control more marketshare. What's not to like. If the seniority lists could be integrated somewhat fairly it would be a win for the pilot groups as well. Not only would they be at a healthier company in the long run, the combined retirements would be staggering. Of course if the other group doesn't get stapled than your group got royally screwed, etc.
I believe you are correct. People are getting wrapped up about "synergies" etc. but this merger would only be about reduction, reduction in capacity and eliminating one competitor.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 11:31 AM
  #109  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Thanks Dal,

I guess I misunderstood what cacti was saying.....
No you didn't misunderstand, the Nic. is "valid" right now, usapa is trying to renegotiate a completed seniority list. Contractually the seniority list is complete, just not implemented.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2011, 11:36 AM
  #110  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by formerdal
The NIC only becomes a valid seniority list with a joint contract in place! If that were not the case they would be abiding by it now. If a merger happens prior to a joint list while the contracts are still seperate then yes, their would need to be a new integration method applied...
This is correct. There is still an AWA seniority list and a USAir seniority list. Those two lists would be handed to the arbitrator along with the AMR list to integrate the lists in some manner.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A320fumes
Major
9
09-16-2010 09:11 AM
Phuz
Mergers and Acquisitions
68
04-22-2010 07:10 AM
SWAjet
Major
8
03-26-2008 05:00 AM
RockBottom
Major
24
11-20-2006 12:35 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
1
10-14-2006 03:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices