SMART Committee
#81
This^^^. And it's why APA should not have started this committee. Starting this committee almost concedes this position, as if the APA is ok with an SLI. Their position should be WO's will be stapled, period dot, we don't need a committee. This pretty clearly is part of Ed's anti ALPA campaign and it could bite him. I just hope the BOD doesn't fund it.
#82
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,113
This is a fantastic post. Wish there were more like it instead of the sensationalism that has immediately followed this announcement.
Only part I disagree with is where we benefit more through ALPA merger policy. The ALPA JSC sent an email 2 days ago telling the WO pilots they will "make certain AA... values the time you dedicated in the AA system". That's an extremely misleading statement for those union officers to make and is offering their membership false hope. The only fair solution is a staple. As you mentioned, the flow through agreements set a precedence of career expectations. Any WO pilot that stayed past their flow date should not be allowed to leap frog and integrate into a higher seniority at mainline that they previously turned down. Were we to switch to ALPA, I personally find it to be a huge conflict of interest for ALPA to represent our interests while simultaneously advocating for WO pilot's tenure at Eagle as "equal". There structure might be better but the rhetoric is not acceptable.
Only part I disagree with is where we benefit more through ALPA merger policy. The ALPA JSC sent an email 2 days ago telling the WO pilots they will "make certain AA... values the time you dedicated in the AA system". That's an extremely misleading statement for those union officers to make and is offering their membership false hope. The only fair solution is a staple. As you mentioned, the flow through agreements set a precedence of career expectations. Any WO pilot that stayed past their flow date should not be allowed to leap frog and integrate into a higher seniority at mainline that they previously turned down. Were we to switch to ALPA, I personally find it to be a huge conflict of interest for ALPA to represent our interests while simultaneously advocating for WO pilot's tenure at Eagle as "equal". There structure might be better but the rhetoric is not acceptable.
As for the conflict of interest in alpa alpa merger, alpa national is completely out of it. Each mec hires independently their own law firm to advocate for their position. Alpa national provides no funding to either side. In essence (and reality) each mec acts as their independent union and use the policy structure provided by national.
The alpa merger policy changed since then, because of that. The new policy requires 3 arbitrators so you mitigate the possibility of having a rogue arbitrator. It also requires them to take into consideration at least: longevity, status & category, and career expectations. Under mackaskill bond, there is no requirement for three arbitrators and the only thing the arbitrator is required to consider is that the final list is fair and equitable. There is a lot more room for interpretation under mckaskill bond.
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 530
The company, APA, and the WO ALPAs all know that a merger will not occur unless it's a staple. AA can go to the WOs and say take the deal or we will slowly shrink you over time while transfering aircraft to other carriers. The pilot shortage will not last forever.
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 378
The WO will vote for staple and APA contract or they won’t be merged.
An APA merger committee could be because it’s likely WO ALPA would have to be voted out formally.
If enough APA pilots were to vote for Alpa on the vote to dissolve WO ALPA then APA would concede to ALPA instead of WO ALPA conceding their assets to APA.
I doubt the WO bargaining agent can just be dissolved because APA is larger without a having a vote. I doubt the APA merger committee is about seniority, and believe it is about how to merge union assets, or how to handle the WO MEC authority from a legal perspective.
People will still be unhappy if the WO keep longevity for vacation and pay steps even with a staple, which is likely what ALPA meant by saying they will make sure AA values your contribution.
Last edited by OpieTaylor; 01-08-2024 at 08:19 PM.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,113
This would be the same as saying you don't trust the people on your board/mec to represent you in a merger. ALPA only provides the merger policy. The mec provides their own funding and attorneys, and strategy, etc. This is why there is ususally a merger fund started, becuase ALPA will not provide a cent.
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,223
When you merge RJ's to mainline, all the employees come over. Labor costs 2x to 3x for above/below the wing, dispatchers, schedulers, pilots and FAs, meachanics, the list goes on. Also now that flights are all "mainline" union contracts are triggered and stations go from Envoy/PDT staffing to mainline overnight.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post