Search

Notices

SMART Committee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2024, 06:44 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,315
Default

Originally Posted by airbusflieger
Even if WO's are brought to mainline, IMO they well not be zippered in, but put at the bottom because of the flow through agreements with the WO.

The career expectation of the WO pilots is explicit and written in a contract.
This^^^. And it's why APA should not have started this committee. Starting this committee almost concedes this position, as if the APA is ok with an SLI. Their position should be WO's will be stapled, period dot, we don't need a committee. This pretty clearly is part of Ed's anti ALPA campaign and it could bite him. I just hope the BOD doesn't fund it.
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 01-08-2024, 06:51 AM
  #82  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,154
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
ALPA merger policy didin't work out so well for America West and USAir. It was pretty damn ugly.
US Air and America West was comparing apples to oranges. AA to the WO regionals is comparing grapefruit to kumquats.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 01-08-2024, 09:12 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,113
Default

Originally Posted by Wink
This is a fantastic post. Wish there were more like it instead of the sensationalism that has immediately followed this announcement.

Only part I disagree with is where we benefit more through ALPA merger policy. The ALPA JSC sent an email 2 days ago telling the WO pilots they will "make certain AA... values the time you dedicated in the AA system". That's an extremely misleading statement for those union officers to make and is offering their membership false hope. The only fair solution is a staple. As you mentioned, the flow through agreements set a precedence of career expectations. Any WO pilot that stayed past their flow date should not be allowed to leap frog and integrate into a higher seniority at mainline that they previously turned down. Were we to switch to ALPA, I personally find it to be a huge conflict of interest for ALPA to represent our interests while simultaneously advocating for WO pilot's tenure at Eagle as "equal". There structure might be better but the rhetoric is not acceptable.
Well, the rhetoric comes from individuals, not the policy. There will always be rhetoric regardless. Some just call that posturing. I probably woulve said it differently, there is nothing wrong, actaully expected, that the mec will protect their constituents' rights in any venue. But yeah, I agree that it can set unrealistic expectations if they actually said something like that.

As for the conflict of interest in alpa alpa merger, alpa national is completely out of it. Each mec hires independently their own law firm to advocate for their position. Alpa national provides no funding to either side. In essence (and reality) each mec acts as their independent union and use the policy structure provided by national.

Originally Posted by highfarfast
All that sounds really expensive when all they have to do is speed up the flow until there is no more WO. There is no maximum limit to the number they can flow per month in the current contracts.
Probaly true. I wasn't passing any judgement. I was just trying to give my two cents from an outsiders point of view.

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
ALPA merger policy didin't work out so well for America West and USAir. It was pretty damn ugly.
The alpa merger policy changed since then, because of that. The new policy requires 3 arbitrators so you mitigate the possibility of having a rogue arbitrator. It also requires them to take into consideration at least: longevity, status & category, and career expectations. Under mackaskill bond, there is no requirement for three arbitrators and the only thing the arbitrator is required to consider is that the final list is fair and equitable. There is a lot more room for interpretation under mckaskill bond.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 01-08-2024, 03:06 PM
  #84  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Fully Retired
Posts: 7,000
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
ALPA merger policy didin't work out so well for America West and USAir. It was pretty damn ugly.
Don't forget TWA. It was why Mccaskill-Bond statute was passed.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 01-08-2024, 03:15 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 530
Default

The company, APA, and the WO ALPAs all know that a merger will not occur unless it's a staple. AA can go to the WOs and say take the deal or we will slowly shrink you over time while transfering aircraft to other carriers. The pilot shortage will not last forever.
Dunkin is offline  
Old 01-08-2024, 07:59 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
ALPA merger policy didin't work out so well for America West and USAir. It was pretty damn ugly.
yeah. No FNG way I would trust alpa to represent me in a merger with the WO pilots.
rdneckpilot is offline  
Old 01-08-2024, 08:06 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by Dunkin
The company, APA, and the WO ALPAs all know that a merger will not occur unless it's a staple. AA can go to the WOs and say take the deal or we will slowly shrink you over time while transfering aircraft to other carriers. The pilot shortage will not last forever.
Yea it will be a staple, there is no way they will try to merge contracts or negotiate a JCBA. The WO don’t even have one list, so they aren’t united and no one is looking for a 4 way merger. A voluntary DOH staple actually solves two problems.

The WO will vote for staple and APA contract or they won’t be merged.

An APA merger committee could be because it’s likely WO ALPA would have to be voted out formally.

If enough APA pilots were to vote for Alpa on the vote to dissolve WO ALPA then APA would concede to ALPA instead of WO ALPA conceding their assets to APA.

I doubt the WO bargaining agent can just be dissolved because APA is larger without a having a vote. I doubt the APA merger committee is about seniority, and believe it is about how to merge union assets, or how to handle the WO MEC authority from a legal perspective.

People will still be unhappy if the WO keep longevity for vacation and pay steps even with a staple, which is likely what ALPA meant by saying they will make sure AA values your contribution.

Last edited by OpieTaylor; 01-08-2024 at 08:19 PM.
OpieTaylor is offline  
Old 01-09-2024, 08:09 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,113
Default

Originally Posted by Dunkin
The company, APA, and the WO ALPAs all know that a merger will not occur unless it's a staple. AA can go to the WOs and say take the deal or we will slowly shrink you over time while transfering aircraft to other carriers. The pilot shortage will not last forever.
This is the SWA/AirTran model. SWA and SWAPA strong armed AirTran ALPA to capitulate rather than keep fighting. Or something to that effect. Probably the more likely scenrio, espeically if AA managment values pilot labor peace.

Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
yeah. No FNG way I would trust alpa to represent me in a merger with the WO pilots.
This would be the same as saying you don't trust the people on your board/mec to represent you in a merger. ALPA only provides the merger policy. The mec provides their own funding and attorneys, and strategy, etc. This is why there is ususally a merger fund started, becuase ALPA will not provide a cent.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 01-09-2024, 10:49 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GrossNavError's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 158
Default

It looks like this may actually be happening and not just a rumor. Apparently this has been talked about for months.
GrossNavError is offline  
Old 01-09-2024, 10:59 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,223
Default

Originally Posted by GrossNavError
It looks like this may actually be happening and not just a rumor. Apparently this has been talked about for months.
When you merge RJ's to mainline, all the employees come over. Labor costs 2x to 3x for above/below the wing, dispatchers, schedulers, pilots and FAs, meachanics, the list goes on. Also now that flights are all "mainline" union contracts are triggered and stations go from Envoy/PDT staffing to mainline overnight.
Name User is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
114
12-11-2015 07:54 PM
newKnow
Delta
80
08-23-2015 11:10 PM
gzsg
Delta
9
07-28-2015 01:05 PM
cactiboss
American
41
06-29-2015 06:37 PM
Ottolillienthal
United
0
04-21-2012 04:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices