Sign the alpa card - end apa dysfunction
#261
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 976
#262
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,733
That and the one or two other niche specialty’s that APA actually excels in would be able to stay in negotiations with ALPA, which would have been a lot easier if the BOD followed the recommendations from their own committee last year.
#263
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 96
Secondly the POD is absurdly good. Fills in a 50% hole in case of LTD.
There are many other areas that APA is solid in. This whole argument seems like a “grass is greener” syndrome with a large price tag.
#264
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,733
Contract Admin has been solid for the past few years. Sound advice, solid knowledge of contract areas I am weak in. I personally had a huge $8000.00 contract win due to a company error.
Secondly the POD is absurdly good. Fills in a 50% hole in case of LTD.
There are many other areas that APA is solid in. This whole argument seems like a “grass is greener” syndrome with a large price tag.
Secondly the POD is absurdly good. Fills in a 50% hole in case of LTD.
There are many other areas that APA is solid in. This whole argument seems like a “grass is greener” syndrome with a large price tag.
Again, as I said all those niche things, once in a career like stuff that you may never actually use, that APA are supposedly superior at (haven't seen any stats to support that) can be negotiated to stay in. ALPA dues will also dramatically decrease with the addition of 15,000 pilots.
I'll also repeat that all of this would have been much easier if the BOD didn't go against their own committee’s recommendations. Can you explain why they did that if it wasn't 100% pure self-interest?
#265
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,466
Contract admin or contract compliance? If Contract Admin they are a joke. Those are civilian nonpilots hired by APA. They barely know the contract, talk to you in a condescending tone, and think all pilots are lazy. Contract compliance is great but those are other pilots helping you out and they are contract experts. I am sure every ALPA pilot union has something similar to that. Actually I know they do from my past airlines.
Again, as I said all those niche things, once in a career like stuff that you may never actually use, that APA are supposedly superior at (haven't seen any stats to support that) can be negotiated to stay in. ALPA dues will also dramatically decrease with the addition of 15,000 pilots.
I'll also repeat that all of this would have been much easier if the BOD didn't go against their own committee’s recommendations. Can you explain why they did that if it wasn't 100% pure self-interest?
Again, as I said all those niche things, once in a career like stuff that you may never actually use, that APA are supposedly superior at (haven't seen any stats to support that) can be negotiated to stay in. ALPA dues will also dramatically decrease with the addition of 15,000 pilots.
I'll also repeat that all of this would have been much easier if the BOD didn't go against their own committee’s recommendations. Can you explain why they did that if it wasn't 100% pure self-interest?
#266
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 96
Contract admin or contract compliance? If Contract Admin they are a joke. Those are civilian nonpilots hired by APA. They barely know the contract, talk to you in a condescending tone, and think all pilots are lazy. Contract compliance is great but those are other pilots helping you out and they are contract experts. I am sure every ALPA pilot union has something similar to that. Actually I know they do from my past airlines.
Again, as I said all those niche things, once in a career like stuff that you may never actually use, that APA are supposedly superior at (haven't seen any stats to support that) can be negotiated to stay in. ALPA dues will also dramatically decrease with the addition of 15,000 pilots.
I'll also repeat that all of this would have been much easier if the BOD didn't go against their own committee’s recommendations. Can you explain why they did that if it wasn't 100% pure self-interest?
Again, as I said all those niche things, once in a career like stuff that you may never actually use, that APA are supposedly superior at (haven't seen any stats to support that) can be negotiated to stay in. ALPA dues will also dramatically decrease with the addition of 15,000 pilots.
I'll also repeat that all of this would have been much easier if the BOD didn't go against their own committee’s recommendations. Can you explain why they did that if it wasn't 100% pure self-interest?
The irony of “condescending tone”. Pot meet kettle.
#267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,733
Crew Schedulers? lol, well then everything I said makes sense. No wonder everybody hates using them. Everybody I know doesn't even bother with Contract Admin anymore, they just go straight to Compliance. I'm happy that Contract Admin helped you out 30 years ago or whatever. But if that is your argument to keep APA then you already lost.
#268
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,083
The conversation is over once you start defending contract ADMIN.
#269
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 1
Just got a fat check from ALPA for reimbursment of dues I paid while at my last 121 carrier, even though I'm no longer an ALPA member.
Did anyone else notice the sequence of events?...
April 19: ALPA announced they had collected too much in dues last year, so they would be returning some of that money to ALPA members, even if you aren't an ALPA member anymore.
June 4th: THEN, and only after ALPA took that initiative, did APA come to us and say "oh, we acutally can afford not to charge our APA members due, lets call it a "dues holiday" of 4 months, enjoy." It's almost as if APA randomly decided they didn't need all the extra money.
My point is, who took the initiative first... ALPA. APA just seems to always follow what ALPA does, and doesn't think or act first. This is what concerns me duirng the next contract negotiations.
Did anyone else notice the sequence of events?...
April 19: ALPA announced they had collected too much in dues last year, so they would be returning some of that money to ALPA members, even if you aren't an ALPA member anymore.
June 4th: THEN, and only after ALPA took that initiative, did APA come to us and say "oh, we acutally can afford not to charge our APA members due, lets call it a "dues holiday" of 4 months, enjoy." It's almost as if APA randomly decided they didn't need all the extra money.
My point is, who took the initiative first... ALPA. APA just seems to always follow what ALPA does, and doesn't think or act first. This is what concerns me duirng the next contract negotiations.
#270
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,466
June 4th: THEN, and only after ALPA took that initiative, did APA come to us and say "oh, we acutally can afford not to charge our APA members due, lets call it a "dues holiday" of 4 months, enjoy." It's almost as if APA randomly decided they didn't need all the extra money.
My point is, who took the initiative first... ALPA. APA just seems to always follow what ALPA does, and doesn't think or act first. This is what concerns me duirng the next contract negotiations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post