AIP 2.0
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
You're contradicting yourself. You say the only comparison that matters is the AA/DAL/UAL. And fortunately, that is the way the mediators and the RLA see it too. Public perception is only important if and when actual politicians get involved, ie Congress. That isn't until the very end of the process.
For now, all that matters is how you guys compare to DAL and UAL. And the fact remains that on this, your fourth attempt, you are still behind. Mediation would help, not hurt your guys. Sure it might take longer, but now with your two main comparitors above you, it's not out of the zone of reasonableness to match them in all parts of the contract, not just pay.
And then surely you can get an extra cent on top, rather than an after snap-up snap-up.
For now, all that matters is how you guys compare to DAL and UAL. And the fact remains that on this, your fourth attempt, you are still behind. Mediation would help, not hurt your guys. Sure it might take longer, but now with your two main comparitors above you, it's not out of the zone of reasonableness to match them in all parts of the contract, not just pay.
And then surely you can get an extra cent on top, rather than an after snap-up snap-up.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,737
We as a group do not have the fortitude to do what is necessary to get the best contract. We have zero unity. It is every pilot in it for themselves. For instance one of the loudest no vote proponents has been exposed for who they really are. Come to find out they have been picking up tons of overtime. Not what should be done during section six. They also do voluntary assignment work for the company. The Union came right out and said don’t do it. They are anyway. This person is getting ready for a management job. I can’t support a no vote when people like this are can’t be counted on. The social media savvy, vocal no voter, chest thumping, entitled children have screwed this up. If you can’t endure a little short term pain by staying out of OT, and not doing company volunteer work then I can’t count on you to do what is necessary to get the contract we deserve. Therefore it’s a yes for me.
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
We have nobody to blame for any perceived shortcoming but ourselves. It’s really that simple. Like I said my notifications are FULL of PR/PM/OG assignments. What ****es me off is people get on here and sling arrows at the people volunteering their time and energy (that these people claim is so valuable while our volunteers give theirs away) call them and the association “pathetic” from the comfort of their couch.
This job is so easy but things about it are hard. You’re going to miss a holiday or two and you may have to work a few long days a month. You knew that when you filled out your application.
we have no unity and no unity leads to a contract you’re not happy with but ultimately the reason for our perceived “pathetic” AIP is in the mirror!
This job is so easy but things about it are hard. You’re going to miss a holiday or two and you may have to work a few long days a month. You knew that when you filled out your application.
we have no unity and no unity leads to a contract you’re not happy with but ultimately the reason for our perceived “pathetic” AIP is in the mirror!
We are doing more WO flying with our 319's and 320's. No more volunteers for the Jelly of the Month program? Who cares?! The company is in business to make money off butts in seats. You walk through the airports every day of the week. They have plenty of butts in seats. Not being able to get someone to volunteer to teach a leadership class is a minuscule issue. They'll find someone even if they have to pull them out of a management position. Stop blaming members of the pilot group when we've been PAYING INCREASED DUES for the past 3-1/2 years so our union could negotiate on our behalf and would have been stuck with what we were about to be presented October of 2022 if it weren't for riding ALPA's coattails.
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Not that I defend or justify all of the PR/PM/OG assignments, but even if we could stop doing all of that without the company calling it a "work action" (same as striking), how much do you really think it'd effect the company? I think scheduling would have to work a bit harder to fill trips and I think they'd cancel a few flights, but our CURRENT contract is so full of ways for the company to screw us that I don't think they'd flinch. They'd adapt and they'd adapt at the cost of more QOL. More RO's, more RA's, reserves would get obliterated more than they do now. Haven't been worked into an off day on reserve? Haven't had a movable off day moved last minute? The company would say, "HOLD MY BEER". I just don't think any of you guys pointing fingers at the ones picking up overtime have any clue just how helpless we really are. No more volunteers for the Jelly of the Month program? Who cares?! The company is in business to make money off butts in seats. You walk through the airports every day of the week. They have plenty of butts in seats. Not being able to get someone to volunteer to teach a leadership class is a minuscule issue. They'll find someone even if they have to pull them out of a management position.
I don’t disagree at all. In fact I’ve made that exact argument. The company will fill the seats if we do PR or not. The issue is when people like KM get her minions all frothed up to vote no and then go out and work for the company that can only mean one thing in my eyes!
I don’t think the metal stops moving but we sure as hell don’t send the message that we actually care about being third in anything! Even though we’re first in a lot of things!!!
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,737
Another horrible take by our Isom stooge. Go to any new hire class and take a poll on what would be common contract knowledge by somebody who has worked here 1-2 years. 95% of the people would fail a 10 question test whether they were mil, WO, regional, Part 91/135, etc. You come here assuming the contracts of the three legacies are the same except a few minor differences. That is what you expect. You expect an INDUSTRY STANDARD to be adhered to. That is not an unreasonable assumption. Nor is it unreasonable to fight for that. You really are a piece of work, the worst kind of peer in a pilot group. You would undermine your own grandmother if it would get you your retro check 2 months sooner.
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Another horrible take by our Isom stooge. Go to any new hire class and take a poll on what would be common contract knowledge by somebody who has worked here 1-2 years. 95% of the people would fail a 10 question test whether they were mil, WO, regional, Part 91/135, etc. You come here assuming the contracts of the three legacies are the same except a few minor differences. That is what you expect. You expect an INDUSTRY STANDARD to be adhered to. That is not an unreasonable assumption. Nor is it unreasonable to fight for that. You really are a piece of work, the worst kind of peer in a pilot group. You would undermine your own grandmother if it would get you your retro check 2 months sooner.
I guess you’ve never heard the old adage about assuming have you. When I was applying for jobs I applied everywhere but I also knew as much as I could about each place so I knew what I was getting into at each. Other people’s lazy ignorance is not my responsibility and I have no patience for people who are too lazy to make an informed decision and then blame others because they don’t like what they signed up for.
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,737
How low is your opinion of yourself that you have to constantly resort to name calling to try and prove your point?
I guess you’ve never heard the old adage about assuming have you. When I was applying for jobs I applied everywhere but I also knew as much as I could about each place so I knew what I was getting into at each. Other people’s lazy ignorance is not my responsibility and I have no patience for people who are too lazy to make an informed decision and then blame others because they don’t like what they signed up for.
I guess you’ve never heard the old adage about assuming have you. When I was applying for jobs I applied everywhere but I also knew as much as I could about each place so I knew what I was getting into at each. Other people’s lazy ignorance is not my responsibility and I have no patience for people who are too lazy to make an informed decision and then blame others because they don’t like what they signed up for.
By the way your whole "well then why did you apply here" excuse for our horrible contract is basically you admitting our contract is pretty bad in the first place, in case you didn't realize that self-own there.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
What names did I call you that aren't 100% true and accurate? Does Isom pay you by the post here?
By the way your whole "well then why did you apply here" excuse for our horrible contract is basically you admitting our contract is pretty bad in the first place, in case you didn't realize that self-own there.
By the way your whole "well then why did you apply here" excuse for our horrible contract is basically you admitting our contract is pretty bad in the first place, in case you didn't realize that self-own there.
If you’re gonna complain about how bad the contract is, which I am NOT doing, then my question stands…why did you apply here?
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,737
Actually no it’s not because I’m not complaining about our contract. I have an excellent QOL and I can’t wait to make more money while enjoying it!
If you’re gonna complain about how bad the contract is, which I am NOT doing, then my question stands…why did you apply here?
If you’re gonna complain about how bad the contract is, which I am NOT doing, then my question stands…why did you apply here?
As far as your last question, I already answered it. Learn to read for comprehension.
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
That's one of the problems hiring guys straight out of the military, you get that mission hacker mentality that totally undermines the pilot group. I was in the military too and did more than my share of deployments. Of course this job is a piece of cake compared but that is not an excuse to settle for a contract that trails our peers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post