Search

Notices

AIP 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2023, 06:11 PM
  #351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver
Seemed to work for Delta. They were the first ones out of the gates with a pretty decent contract coming out of a previously pretty decent contract.
You didn’t answer the questions. Do you know how mediation works? Do you know the role of a mediator?

Delta got to where they got not because of a mediator but because they have a management team that knows their worth. Mediators are nothing but facilitators between two willing (or unwilling) parties. If the company isn’t going to budge any more than they have there isn't thing one a mediator can do about it and all your magic bag of beans mediation plan gets you is a waste of time.

educate yourself on the mediation process. And I mean that sincerely it is not the golden ticket so many no voters think it is!!
sumwherelse is offline  
Old 08-13-2023, 06:33 PM
  #352  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver
Seemed to work for Delta. They were the first ones out of the gates with a pretty decent contract coming out of a previously pretty decent contract.
Richest and most profitable legacy, by far, and STILL was in mediation for well over a year, and then reportedly only got their deal finalized following their CEO going on a national news network and ****ing off the mediator by saying the pilots couldn’t legally strike.

To expect that we could follow that same path by filing for immediate federal mediation and quickly win a few work rules, RIGS, and a pilot guaranteed trading system without losing any of the gains we currently stand to gain is just not realistic. Look at when SWAPAs and FDX ALPAs next scheduled meeting with their mediators are.
Easyflier301 is offline  
Old 08-13-2023, 06:46 PM
  #353  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
I’m not a “no” voter. What I am is someone that expected the union negotiators to deliver something better. These are the kinds of things that should have been addressed before coming to a vote. But here we are. And it’s not like I don’t see improvements in this TA. It’s clearly a better deal than we currently have. It’s that every one of the QOL items I was interested for my own situation is somewhere between unchanged or improved a small enough degree to which there’s no functional QOL improvement for me. But I don’t think voting no now will create improvement in the areas I would like to see improved. So I’m sitting back annoyingly hoping it passes.



Yes, unimplemented items were the company’s to leverage if the NC chose to address them. And they could have been addressed. For all I know they were actually discussed and was deemed not worth the cost by the NC… I certainly wasn’t sitting there. That’s pretty much what a negotiation is.



But my point was simply saying “it’s already in the contract and unimplemented” is a cop out that simply dismisses the concerns of pilots that don’t want said items ever implemented. The logic with that is we can change things that are written and in effect and implemented and in current practice but we can’t change something that hasn’t even been implemented yet? Come on now… /rolleyes/
I wouldn’t call it a cop out as much as a reality check. If it’s something the company wants eventually and it’s in the current contract and unimplemented, then it is leverage for them. Let’s take the reserve system and buckets, for example. They can tell us to take the current offer in the new TA (which we had a say in) or leave it, but one way or another it’s coming because if we turn down the TA, they will implement current book to drive efficiency gains anyway. Wouldn’t that be how you would negotiate for something you wanted if you had that leverage?

So assuming we argued and pushed hard for better but that is their position, our only options in the negotiation are to “call their bluff” and walk away on that portion (as suss puts it) but then if they call OUR bluff and press ahead, we are in a weaker position moving forward spending capital while trying to negotiate backwards, and meanwhile we will have a system we all hate and had no say in…

Will also add, at least for the reserve provisions, APA seemed willing to sacrifice more “leveling” on the reserve side resulting in productivity gains with the goal is creating more lineholders.

in our pilot group we have a number of folks complaining about the new reserve system (because they like reserve and have carved out a niche), but we also have tons of people on these pages complaining about the amount of reserves AA keeps (due to lack of productivity of current practices). If the amount of flying is static, which would we prefer? More lineholders creating more tradeability, or less efficient (and more) reserves? This is the problem the union faces.

Last edited by Easyflier301; 08-13-2023 at 06:59 PM.
Easyflier301 is offline  
Old 08-13-2023, 08:33 PM
  #354  
Line Holder
 
OldWeasel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver
Age 67.999 will be coming soon to a theater near you; possibly 1 Oct. Stalling this contract even more will possibly keep a few less 65'ers on property. I am all for mediation.
I just left a shop that had their last contract mediated. It didn't go well at all. If the issue of a few 65'ers is your only reason, be careful what you ask for. The financial effects of a lousy contract can last longer than the end of the contract.
OldWeasel is offline  
Old 08-13-2023, 09:04 PM
  #355  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Easyflier301
Richest and most profitable legacy, by far, and STILL was in mediation for well over a year, and then reportedly only got their deal finalized following their CEO going on a national news network and ****ing off the mediator by saying the pilots couldn’t legally strike.

To expect that we could follow that same path by filing for immediate federal mediation and quickly win a few work rules, RIGS, and a pilot guaranteed trading system without losing any of the gains we currently stand to gain is just not realistic. Look at when SWAPAs and FDX ALPAs next scheduled meeting with their mediators are.
guys like you make the mediator’s job easy. Good grief, surrendered before even showing resolve.
palooza is offline  
Old 08-14-2023, 04:17 AM
  #356  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by palooza
guys like you make the mediator’s job easy. Good grief, surrendered before even showing resolve.
And guys like you make the company salivate. I’ll ask you what I’ve asked others and still haven’t gotten an answer for. Do you know how mediation works? Do you even know the role of a mediator?
sumwherelse is offline  
Old 08-14-2023, 05:22 AM
  #357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,739
Default

Originally Posted by Easyflier301

in our pilot group we have a number of folks complaining about the new reserve system (because they like reserve and have carved out a niche), but we also have tons of people on these pages complaining about the amount of reserves AA keeps (due to lack of productivity of current practices). If the amount of flying is static, which would we prefer? More lineholders creating more tradeability, or less efficient (and more) reserves? This is the problem the union faces.
What specifically in the new contract requires AA to hold less reserve percentage per bid group? Or are we just taking their word on something....... again. Not like we never got burned on that before.
ImSoSuss is offline  
Old 08-14-2023, 05:24 AM
  #358  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,739
Default

Originally Posted by sumwherelse
And guys like you make the company salivate. I’ll ask you what I’ve asked others and still haven’t gotten an answer for. Do you know how mediation works? Do you even know the role of a mediator?
Really, it was guys like him that has forced management back to the table 3 times already. Meanwhile guys like you were jumping for joy at the Targeted Approach cause "you never know when the next ReCeSsIoN is coming"
ImSoSuss is offline  
Old 08-14-2023, 05:36 AM
  #359  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
What specifically in the new contract requires AA to hold less reserve percentage per bid group? Or are we just taking their word on something....... again. Not like we never got burned on that before.
Its a more efficient system.
sumwherelse is offline  
Old 08-14-2023, 05:39 AM
  #360  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
Really, it was guys like him that has forced management back to the table 3 times already. Meanwhile guys like you were jumping for joy at the Targeted Approach cause "you never know when the next ReCeSsIoN is coming"
nobody forced anyone to do anything. The first LOA was DOA that thing was a giant turd that’s why it never got past the board or even through the process. TA1.0 would have passed fairly easily and then United came along and required TA2.0.

oh…and Delta.

Don’t break your arm patting yourself on the back you and your “no” army had little to do with where we are now. Pattern bargaining in real time is why we are here not your constant spoiled brat complaining.
sumwherelse is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LVA8R
American
52
07-20-2023 03:47 AM
JohnGardner
Regional
44
02-11-2014 06:50 PM
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
SoCalGuy
United
327
08-18-2012 05:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices