Search

Notices

Vote NO. Why:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2023, 07:11 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,247
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
Yeah, Ed’s comments were unexpected to me. I thought he’d be more positive about what a NO vote could accomplish. He didn’t seem optimistic that the company would give more, and said mediation is tough, “they don’t like to mess with work rules”. He did not say how he would vote though.
Ed and his temper almost killed the entire thing. Guessing he had some sense talked into him, and is treading much more lightly.
Name User is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 08:15 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hueypilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: B737
Posts: 1,204
Default

Originally Posted by dsevo
I won’t guarantee you ****! I’m perfectly fine under the current contract…

Well this is probably one of the most nonsensical, least logical statements posted lately.

Basically, if you can’t have your perfect grand-slam contract complete with your own personal unicorn, you’d rather work under worse rules and pay indefinitely.

I’m on board with the others. It’s not a home run. But I’ll take the triple and advance e forward. Voting yes.
Hueypilot is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 08:18 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Hueypilot
Well this is probably one of the most nonsensical, least logical statements posted lately.

Basically, if you can’t have your perfect grand-slam contract complete with your own personal unicorn, you’d rather work under worse rules and pay indefinitely.

I’m on board with the others. It’s not a home run. But I’ll take the triple and advance e forward. Voting yes.
the logical fallacy of entitlement.

Don’t try to understand. It will make your head hurt.
rdneckpilot is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 08:25 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 199
Default

These yes voters are why AA pilots can't have nice things.


Bottom of the barrel sick accrual at 60 hours a year. Don't get the sick hours you've earned until the following year. Can't pick up the remainder of the trip if you call out of any part.

Can't decline RO anymore.

Electronic notification making it easier for the company.

Nothing to fix TTS, red/redder - which is absolutely locked down and won't change.

Many things don't go into effect for 18-36 months.

No penalties if AA misses deadlines.

No snap up.

No two pilot requirement in the contract.



Just to name a few. We were promised QOL, it isn't there. At all. What you get is a pay raise thanks to Delta stepping up industry pay. Biggest hiring boom ever. Largest numbers of retirements ever. If we vote no AA will have to come to the table quickly because they can't afford to let everyone else hire all the qualified applicants as the rest get their new contracts. We'll get stuck with the flows who can't get hired anywhere else and have no choice but waiting their turn.


So quick to cave in and accept anything thrown your way. It's pathetic.
Rroku is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 08:32 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hueypilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: B737
Posts: 1,204
Default

Originally Posted by Rroku
These yes voters are why AA pilots can't have nice things.


Bottom of the barrel sick accrual at 60 hours a year.
Don't get the sick hours you've earned until the following year.
Can't pick up the remainder of the trip if you call out of any part.

Can't decline RO anymore.

Electronic notification making it easier for the company.

Nothing to fix TTS, red/redder.

Many things don't go into effect for 18-36 months.

No penalties if AA misses deadlines.

No snap up.

No two pilot requirement in the contract.



Just to name a few. We were promised QOL, it isn't there. At all. What you get is a pay raise thanks to Delta stepping up industry pay. Biggest hiring boom ever. Largest numbers of retirements ever. If we vote no AA will have to come to the table quickly because they can't afford to let everyone else hire all the qualified applicants as the rest get their new contracts. We'll get stuck with the flows who can't get hired anywhere else and have no choice but waiting their turn.


So quick to cave in and accept anything thrown your way. It's pathetic.
Ah yes, our employment conditions are so dire and awful. How do we manage to go to work every day?

All sarcasm aside…I think it’s fantasy to believe if we vote no, then AA will come running to us to settle on these items. Bottom line is we have no shortage of applicants. And even SWA, which is losing people left and right, has remained stubborn and refuses to settle their negotiations. You really do think AA will cave to your demands? It’s highly unlikely they will. Voting no will only drag this out even longer for marginal or no real gains.
Hueypilot is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 08:34 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by Rroku
These yes voters are why AA pilots can't have nice things.


Bottom of the barrel sick accrual at 60 hours a year. Don't get the sick hours you've earned until the following year. Can't pick up the remainder of the trip if you call out of any part.

Can't decline RO anymore.

Electronic notification making it easier for the company.

Nothing to fix TTS, red/redder - which is absolutely locked down and won't change.

Many things don't go into effect for 18-36 months.

No penalties if AA misses deadlines.

No snap up.

No two pilot requirement in the contract.



Just to name a few. We were promised QOL, it isn't there. At all. What you get is a pay raise thanks to Delta stepping up industry pay. Biggest hiring boom ever. Largest numbers of retirements ever. If we vote no AA will have to come to the table quickly because they can't afford to let everyone else hire all the qualified applicants as the rest get their new contracts. We'll get stuck with the flows who can't get hired anywhere else and have no choice but waiting their turn.


So quick to cave in and accept anything thrown your way. It's pathetic.
What do you mean by you don’t get your sick time you’ve earned until the following year?
El Peso is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 09:07 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by Rroku
These yes voters are why AA pilots can't have nice things.


Bottom of the barrel sick accrual at 60 hours a year. Don't get the sick hours you've earned until the following year.
I think you’re talking about how this affects new hires maybe? If so, with this TA news hires will be preloaded 22:30 of sick upon completion of initial training.

Can't pick up the remainder of the trip if you call out of any part.
Agreed. This is stupid.

Can't decline RO anymore.
You can unilaterally decline future RO. Also daily RO with mutual agreement (I know, I know…)

Electronic notification making it easier for the company.
It’s electronic communication. You can set your preferences to still require first person contact. Don’t know about you but I don’t enjoy checking my voicemail, going though the phone tree, being on hold, only to tell tracking “yes I see you delayed my departure tomorrow afternoon”. Also I don’t enjoy repeating that process to tell them that I will NS my DH. Or that I’m calling in sick. I’m looking forward to 21st century communication.

Nothing to fix TTS, red/redder - which is absolutely locked down and won't change.

Many things don't go into effect for 18-36 months.
85% of contract value, NOT including pay rates, goes into effect on DOS.

No penalties if AA misses deadlines.
Wrong. There’s a lot to this section, but the penalties comes through a separate grievance process established outside of section 23 that includes an objective arbitrator who can impose damages. (Four such arbitrators have been selected by AA and APA)

No snap up.

No two pilot requirement in the contract.



Just to name a few. We were promised QOL, it isn't there. At all. What you get is a pay raise thanks to Delta stepping up industry pay.
Yes thanks Delta, and we surpassed them by getting a 3% raise three months prior to the amendable date.

Biggest hiring boom ever. Largest numbers of retirements ever. If we vote no AA will have to come to the table quickly because they can't afford to let everyone else hire all the qualified applicants as the rest get their new contracts. We'll get stuck with the flows who can't get hired anywhere else and have no choice but waiting their turn.


So quick to cave in and accept anything thrown your way. It's pathetic.
Not trying to be rude, but you really ought to educate yourself on what’s in this TA. You’re mad and disappointed yet half the stuff you said isn’t even right. You’ll be happier and healthier if you bother to learn the facts first instead of glancing at something and instinctually taking to APC or social media to air your grievances.

Just saying.
El Peso is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 09:12 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,247
Default

Also don't forget back pay. I calculated out to just over $80k.

I don't understand the position of voting no because you are happy with the current contract. By the time we'd finish arbitration, we'll be halfway through his new contract. Good luck getting 18-24 months of back pay after it's turned down.
Name User is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 09:25 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
What do you mean by you don’t get your sick time you’ve earned until the following year?

We earn 5 hours per month sick time. However, that sick time isn't awarded on a monthly basis. After working Jan - March we don't have 15 hours sick time come April. We get a lump sum 60 hours the following January for what we earned the previous year. And the (current) 15 hours fronted to newbs gets deducted down the road so you don't get 60 hours for the year, only 45.
Rroku is offline  
Old 07-12-2023, 11:50 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,970
Default

Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
I have the same problem. I just can’t get behind a no vote. Everyone has a price for everything. I guess real trip trade and more awesome reserve costs about 8.6 billion for me.

No one knows what will happen if we vote no. The company could come back quickly like the OP claims. Or they could tell us to F off for another year. Whatever we get would have to be epic to make it worth not having the 2 billion over the next year.

It’s an easy, ****ed off and disappointed yes for me.
DAL and UAL both have shown that TA gets shot down, Union leadership receives new direction (and some misguided folks have to go back to flying the line) and TA 2 comes about 12 months later with a boatload of more improvements.
Otterbox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tom11011
Regional
11
12-17-2014 04:56 AM
Bluto
Major
41
06-02-2012 10:00 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
05-12-2005 11:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices