Search

Notices

Vote NO. Why:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2023, 01:16 PM
  #111  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
Top rate of 417.54 vs 421.72 is 1%. Where are you getting 2?

Did involuntary FSB survive?

I do think many will change to a no just on principle.
DL's contract takes a look at the top captain rate, and if higher takes that higher number and add's 1% to it. The tables in UA's AIP (which trigger the DL 1% Me-Too) have not yet included that 1%, so you need to add another 1% to that 421.72. After that math, the new top rate is $425.94, or about 2.01% above the current DL/AA rate of 417.54.

No more involuntary FSB for UA,

Last edited by FangsF15; 07-15-2023 at 01:21 PM. Reason: added the actual values
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:21 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,247
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
It's not $2. It's more like 2%. Over every cell on every Table. after you do the require math, that will put the NB rate you just quoted at about 356.52. $20 bucks an hour enough to make you reconsider? The 2026 value will be about $404.86. Top end caption will be 483.68.
Can you explain how $338.48 becomes $356.52? And why it doesn't say $356.52 instead?

I took Calculus at a community college so I am math challenged.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
pay.jpg (20.7 KB, 183 views)
Name User is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:26 PM
  #113  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Can you explain how $338.48 becomes $356.52? And why it doesn't say $356.52 instead?

I took Calculus at a community college so I am math challenged.
Keep in mind that table does not yet include the 1% snap up, according to the text below that table in the UA AIP. That's why it doesn't say 356.52.

As I stated above, DL's me too is tiggered off the top paying captain rate, then takes that % and adds it to the rest of the tables. UA's AIP adds 2.01% to every single cell. UA then "snaps up" to match the new DL rate making UA&DL the same for the duration of the contract. The top NB rate at DL is for the 757 and 321 NEO, which will now become about 356.52. AA did not include a me-too in thier AIP, correct?.

In all the haste of math, need to make sure are comparing apples to apples here too. We may have crossed the streams, I can't keep up on the fly. So correct me if I'm wrong.

*Edit* I think we (I?) mixed two different airframes from 2 different tables. The top NB rate is 356.52, but the cell you are going off of isn't the top rate. So 338.48 becomes 345.24. I thought the rate you were quoting was the top rate for comparison. My apologies for the mix up.

Last edited by FangsF15; 07-15-2023 at 01:46 PM.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:28 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,247
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
As I stated above, DL's me too is tiggered off the top paying captain rate, then takes that % and adds it to the rest of the tables. UA's AIP adds 2.01% to every single cell. UA then "snaps up" to match the new DL rate making UA&DL the same for the duration of the contract. AA did not include a me-too in thier AIP, correct?.
2% on $338.48 is $345.25, where did $356.52 come from again? That's a 5% difference in pay vs AA(!).

No snap up, but we did get perpetual 3% raises after agreement expires. APA felt that was a fair trade. If the difference is $20/hr, certainly not agreeable with that but I still can't follow your pilot math.
Name User is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:34 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,175
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
2% on $338.48 is $345.25, where did $356.52 come from again? That's a 5% difference in pay vs AA(!).

No snap up, but we did get perpetual 3% raises after agreement expires. APA felt that was a fair trade. If the difference is $20/hr, certainly not agreeable with that but I still can't follow your pilot math.
”Perpetual” raises? As in every year for infinity? No they didn’t.
thrust is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:37 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,247
Default

Originally Posted by thrust
”Perpetual” raises? As in every year for infinity? No they didn’t.
You might be right. I had read that somewhere but it sounded too good to be true. I wonder why they didn't get a snapup, what was the trade?

OK I see it. We got a 3% raise after agreement expires for that year. That was the trade. WTF were they thinking with that.
Name User is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:47 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 525
Default

And to reiterate what was said earlier United has improved Reserve QOL including the elimination of FSB/Hot reserve
Jdub2 is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:50 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
UA has hot reserve, AA does not. Would you trade that? Would you throw the junior under the bus for the stuff in the UA contract? I bet most would but definitely not a great look.
Wrong. Field standby becomes VOLUNTARY ONLY, and is compensated well. Just like Delta. Are you guys being disingenuous, or just lazy?


Page 13 of UPA23.

NEW - No mandatory Field Standby assignments; Voluntary Field Standby pays 3 hours of Add Pay
Clearly you care about the "junior". Thanks for the laugh.
Montcalm is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:52 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,801
Default

Originally Posted by Jdub2
And to reiterate what was said earlier United has improved Reserve QOL including the elimination of FSB/Hot reserve
HUGE! Absolutely huge!

For the people in the back, this is what it looks like to score a significant QOL gain during the most pilot friendly negotiating environment we have ever seen.
ImSoSuss is offline  
Old 07-15-2023, 01:56 PM
  #120  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,164
Default

Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
HUGE! Absolutely huge!

For the people in the back, this is what it looks like to score a significant QOL gain during the most pilot friendly negotiating environment we have ever seen.
I can’t tell you if you’re a massive troll or just an idiot, but Delta and American never had FSB to negotiate because THEY CURRENTLY DON’T HAVE FEILD STANBY. Only one major airline pilot group had to suck that up for the last 5 years.

If that’s considered a “Win” for UAL ALPA it’s the most pathetic W in the history of airline bargaining. They shouldn’t have wasted a dime of barging on FSB.
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tom11011
Regional
11
12-17-2014 04:56 AM
Bluto
Major
41
06-02-2012 10:00 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
05-12-2005 11:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices