Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
How was picketing? State of negotiations? >

How was picketing? State of negotiations?

Search

Notices

How was picketing? State of negotiations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2023, 03:58 PM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
Because a better answer is just to flat out limit the optimizer to a certain percentage of 4/5 day trips and not create a mini b-scale for pilots flying the split duty trips.

I'm with Saabs-huh?

So we just tell the company "We'll control the optimizer, thanks." Let me know how that works.

Some of the split duty trips would be some of the highest rig trips. Picture CLT-GSO-CLT for 7:00 or more.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 05-16-2023, 05:43 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
I'm with Saabs-huh?

So we just tell the company "We'll control the optimizer, thanks." Let me know how that works.

Some of the split duty trips would be some of the highest rig trips. Picture CLT-GSO-CLT for 7:00 or more.
Of course, they could create as many CLT-GSO-CLT trips that cross 1:30am as they want right now. They just have to pay 10:30.

If implemented correctly, with strict limitations and severe penalties for whatever unforeseen abuse, I could get on board with them. I’ve seen “only allocated via PBS bidding, if in open time reverts to 10:30, etc” thrown out there. Would have to have that, and severe penalties beyond just a fatigue call when your 5 hour hotel room isn’t ready, the hotel shuttle takes 45 minutes to show, etc etc. Devils in the details.
thrust is offline  
Old 05-16-2023, 06:37 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs
Those are two separate things. Are you thinking one is a substitute for the other? Or that someone is intending it to be?
They aren't separate. The excuse for allowing these split duty trips that pay less than 10:30 is so that the optimizer will create less 4 and 5 day trips with 30 hour sits.

So instead of trying to manipulate the optimizer indirectly by paying split duty pilots less than "regular" pilots we can just add a hard percentage limit on 4/5 day trips.
ACEssXfer is offline  
Old 05-16-2023, 06:40 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
I'm with Saabs-huh?

So we just tell the company "We'll control the optimizer, thanks." Let me know how that works.

Some of the split duty trips would be some of the highest rig trips. Picture CLT-GSO-CLT for 7:00 or more.
Trip construction limits are pretty common at other airlines. That isn't "controlling the optimizer."
ACEssXfer is offline  
Old 05-17-2023, 04:55 AM
  #125  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2021
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by GhettoJet

You all realize that an operation that regularly builds lines between 82 and 89 hours a month isn't historically "normal" for a unionized 121 flag carrier, right?
This here so true! Thats absolutely unacceptable and also min 10 dfp for lineholders.
and how come that almost nobody pays attention to STD? Also didnt see anything regarding sick time. Wtf
jetlagclub is offline  
Old 05-17-2023, 05:26 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,739
Default

Very depressing Town Hall from the Union last night. They've all but flat out admitted that they are in way over their heads and the company is not budging. The Union's contract page has not been updated since May 8th which further indicates zero progress.

Mediation and ALPA merger are the necessary next steps. Something's got to change.
ImSoSuss is offline  
Old 05-17-2023, 05:54 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 199
Default

"We're shooting for the stars...... but it's up to the company."

Were a few good questions by callers. Premium crusaders got called out, lead by example isn't a tough concept to grasp. Sick time, come on man! The one about it not being a tough negotiation was good - here is what we demand, period. It shouldn't be shooting for the stars at all, here's what we demand. Meet it or no deal.

They did sound defeated already. "It's up to the company." Then force their decision in favor of us!
Rroku is offline  
Old 05-17-2023, 05:57 AM
  #128  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 24
Default

Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
They've all but flat out admitted that they are in way over their heads.

…wait, but they told me that if I panhandled for my job by holding a sign outside the airport was going to get a contract done!
DTswiss1100 is offline  
Old 05-17-2023, 08:46 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by thrust
Of course, they could create as many CLT-GSO-CLT trips that cross 1:30am as they want right now. They just have to pay 10:30.

If implemented correctly, with strict limitations and severe penalties for whatever unforeseen abuse, I could get on board with them. I’ve seen “only allocated via PBS bidding, if in open time reverts to 10:30, etc” thrown out there. Would have to have that, and severe penalties beyond just a fatigue call when your 5 hour hotel room isn’t ready, the hotel shuttle takes 45 minutes to show, etc etc. Devils in the details.

Yeah, they could, but they are not doing that. Seems that rig is a bridge too far.

I agree that they would have to have limitations, and no one trust AA to not drive around the. They may not a good idea here, but I'd like to see the idea canceled on facts.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 05-17-2023, 08:56 AM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Yeah, they could, but they are not doing that. Seems that rig is a bridge too far.

I agree that they would have to have limitations, and no one trust AA to not drive around the. They may not a good idea here, but I'd like to see the idea canceled on facts.
They certainly don’t build them in PBS. They very much exist as broken up trips as the optimizer’s perfect 4/5 day trip inevitably falls apart. The “fly CLT-GSO last flight of the night, layover, deadhead GSO-CLT the next day for 10:30 (15:45 much of the time at premium) and just no show the deadhead and take the first flight out and home for breakfast” trips go stupid senior to those who can clear their schedules and live in DOTC (this isn’t a convo about the ethics of doing so in negotiations, that horse has been beaten to death). Without protecting those from the company, I’m an absolute no.

Agree, but I don’t know who to believe with these negotiations. It seems that the internal APA warring factions are hard at work spreading half-truths in an effort to support whatever agenda.
thrust is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
Halon1211
Major
15
03-03-2020 08:47 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
23
08-05-2009 06:13 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
5
11-16-2005 11:45 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
05-27-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices