Search

Notices

Close Call at JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2023, 04:31 PM
  #61  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,670
Default

Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
It is a very captain centric airline... Even the Reject TO is only a captain decision.
If the FO actually calls for a reject, any CA in his right mind will comply below V1. Especially at a major.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 04:35 PM
  #62  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,670
Default

Originally Posted by Shakinthefat
Agree 100%. Prior to takeoff you Call to JFK tower to discuss that you crossed an active runway without permission and a airplane had to abort because of your actions.
Then you call AA duty pilot and explain situation, he calls CP on call and gives you the green light to proceed….enjoy the London layover. NTSB will determine if that was the correct decision.
It was, if all relevant parties agree.

If you bust a crossing restriction do you immediately divert to nearest suitable and JS home to wait for the FAA to decide your fate? No, you finish the day, head to the hotel and try to remember to file an asap before you go down to the bar.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 04:59 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 373
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
It’s not necessarily overbearing but with the very recent manual change (1/3/2023), it could literally be the FO’s 1st PA in over 20 years. A lot of CA’s are probably just trying to be helpful, since this was a rollout of changes, with zero training

Its overbearing… a competent CA should be confident that a qualified first officer can make a PA… after all most FOs talk on the radio to ATC all day long…

Heck, it’s the FOs that should be worried that their CA knows how to use an iPad. Heaven forbid there’s no “home button” or we didn’t print the latest ATIS on paper via ACARS every 10 mins when Jepp FD on the iPad can give you the ATIS instantly digitally… “I just like to have the paper version, I’m old school”.
CADR is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 05:04 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 291
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It was, if all relevant parties agree.

If you bust a crossing restriction do you immediately divert to nearest suitable and JS home to wait for the FAA to decide your fate? No, you finish the day, head to the hotel and try to remember to file an asap before you go down to the bar.
Apples to oranges.
They weren’t enroute, or on an arrival.
They sat with the parking brake set, for ~20min, taking in the gravity of the situation.
Had I been part of that crew, I would be making very vocal statements for the benefit of the CVR mic that I was no longer fit to continue the takeoff. Deep and irretrievably in the Red.
“…finish the day.” Hands down the WORST keyboard warrior hot take I think I’ve ever seen from you on this board. W+F, man?

That to me is the biggest shocker, that they elected to continue. No. Just no.
Even if the data available is a fuzzy 50%, that’s the easy part of this whole mess.
They each spent the rest of this flight, departure, crossing the NAT tracks, arrival into London, with this weighing on their minds.

Like someone said earlier, There but for the Grace of God go I.
BFMthisA10 is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 05:20 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by biigD
The third crewmember was required and should be just as involved in what's going on as the other two. It should have all been briefed, and nothing should have been happening as they were crossing the runway. Of course I'm using the word 'should' in each case, but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. The crew was JFK based, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're all familiar. That said, I find it very unlikely that all three were new to operating at JFK.

Of course I don't know, but this feels like expectation bias. I'll bet they did exactly what they briefed.
I’m 100% with you on expectation bias. Expected 31 cross 4. Got the opposite. Did what was briefed. Of course we don’t know but this is plausible.
pangolin is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 05:44 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,535
Default

Originally Posted by CADR
Its overbearing… a competent CA should be confident that a qualified first officer can make a PA… after all most FOs talk on the radio to ATC all day long…

Heck, it’s the FOs that should be worried that their CA knows how to use an iPad. Heaven forbid there’s no “home button” or we didn’t print the latest ATIS on paper via ACARS every 10 mins when Jepp FD on the iPad can give you the ATIS instantly digitally… “I just like to have the paper version, I’m old school”.
Not sure if you know this, but the all the PA’s other than the prepare for takeoff (and landing) PA’s were open to either crew member at any time. When I was an FO, many CA’s would ask me if I wanted to do the PA’s. Sometimes I said sure, but more often than not, I’d say no thanks, that’s what they pay you the big bucks for, and we’d chuckle and that’d be that. During the course of conversation, if it was brought up, most of the captains would say they just got tired of offering it because the answer was almost always no, so they just assumed (through experience) that almost no FO’s wanted to do the PA’s anyway.

Most understood and agreed that the Prepare for Takeoff PA’s should have been done by the FO. Now, finally, it is.

Personally, I’m with Varks, I don’t listen in. Ever. Why should I? And I’m sure he and I are not in the minority on this.

As for IPads…
I can tell you that in literally thousands of flights as an FO, I cannot remember even one captain who wasn’t competent in the use of it. Yes, SOME were more savvy in its use than others, but all of them were at the very least usefully competent with it. Did that mean that some guys liked a paper copy of the ATIS? Sure. Who cares? Heck, I just flew with an FO who printed one up every leg for four full days. It was his thing. I literally could not have cared less.

Last edited by 450knotOffice; 01-17-2023 at 06:03 PM.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 06:21 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,908
Default

Originally Posted by CADR
Its overbearing… a competent CA should be confident that a qualified first officer can make a PA… after all most FOs talk on the radio to ATC all day long…

Heck, it’s the FOs that should be worried that their CA knows how to use an iPad. Heaven forbid there’s no “home button” or we didn’t print the latest ATIS on paper via ACARS every 10 mins when Jepp FD on the iPad can give you the ATIS instantly digitally… “I just like to have the paper version, I’m old school”.
im not some old and busted captain. Hell I’m not even 40, but I’ve been a captain here for almost a decade. I do know the control freak whackadoodles exist though.

That being said….A lot of our new hires over the years have literally never made a PA ever or are way out of practice. On the 190 it was split duty, and they had to learn. Then the AAL mentality started permeating. Then practically policy (but not really) that I do it all. I still offered but half refused. Then the 190 went away and almost no one wanted to do them on my new fleet so I stopped asking. Many FO’s general lack of awareness of the timing of the PAs, much less the content is palpable, during the few trips I’ve done since the switch. I’m not going to listen to them talk, but Half the time I have to show them the button (if it even works after so many years of disuse), how not talk over the FA’s PA, and when to make them, etc. Stupid house cleaning crap that I’m sure is an annoying distraction for everyone, and it’s not their fault. It would have normally been ironed in a loft sim or on IOE. To top it off the captains have to break their reflexes that go back to the 727… (hand motion for gear much?!?). So yeah, we’re all professionals, but we are breaking the yoke of 90 years of ancestor worship this month.

Last edited by AllYourBaseAreB; 01-17-2023 at 06:31 PM.
AllYourBaseAreB is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 06:36 PM
  #68  
Screen Toucher
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: F/O
Posts: 197
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
we are breaking the yoke of 90 years of ancestor worship this month.
What happens when they take away the dot matrix printers?
SunDevilPilot is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 06:58 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,300
Default

Originally Posted by CADR
Its overbearing… a competent CA should be confident that a qualified first officer can make a PA… after all most FOs talk on the radio to ATC all day long…

Heck, it’s the FOs that should be worried that their CA knows how to use an iPad. Heaven forbid there’s no “home button” or we didn’t print the latest ATIS on paper via ACARS every 10 mins when Jepp FD on the iPad can give you the ATIS instantly digitally… “I just like to have the paper version, I’m old school”.
As long as the FO doesn’t say “this is your Captain speaking” before making their PA I don’t GAS what they say. I haven’t printed ATIS since it became available on the iPad like 6 years ago. I tell my FO’s “don’t print it for me, only print it if you want in” pretty much 100% still print it after that.
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 01-17-2023, 08:17 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

How the delta crew missed the 777. Watch this video by Juan Brown. The ADSB data shows the delta underway with a clear runway and the tower cancelling the TO clearance before the American entered the runway. Controller absolutely saved the day. Had delta not rejected at the time they did the collision would have happened. By the time Delta would have seen the 777 was not stopping it would have been too late. Watch the video.

https://youtu.be/81zsojuCGRk


Originally Posted by dwightkschrute
METAR at the time was for 10 miles vis and ceilings broken at about 2200 feet. I’m not sure how the Delta crew could miss a 777 taxing across their runway but I’m not here to pass judgement.

I got clearance to taxi across runway 11 in MSY a few years back. I looked to the right and saw a light twin (Cessna 310 possibly) over the threshold. I told the captain to stop, which he did (and I was ready on the brakes). I told tower that we were holding short for landing traffic. After a few seconds of silence he responded with American 123, hold short runway 11.

Point being is that anyone can make a mistake and if the crew or controller don’t catch it, then it can have deadly consequences.
pangolin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
fanaticalflyer
United
21
06-06-2018 03:55 PM
trackpilot
Hangar Talk
6
12-10-2007 05:24 PM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM
Sir James
Cargo
2
01-30-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices