Search

Notices

Close Call at JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2023, 04:40 AM
  #241  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,906
Default

Definitely a slippery slope.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 04:49 AM
  #242  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
Definitely a slippery slope.
APA and American will not win this one with NTSB.
JayRalstonSmith is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 06:07 AM
  #243  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,906
Default

Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
APA and American will not win this one with NTSB.
I don’t think APA is looking for a win (insert contract history joke here)
I think they’re looking for a compromise to get the best outcome.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 06:22 AM
  #244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,410
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
Based on the posted article (and who knows how accurate that even is?), the AA crew did call the tower on a recorded line.

One scenario where I’d imagine counsel would be hesitant to advise a formal recorded/transcribed interview would be if those tapes weren’t available to review prior to a debrief.

Anything said that “contradicted” the recorded tower conversation might be construed as dissembling then or changing a story a month later..not good. But also very unfair; recollections of eye witnesses and participants to events are usually terrible. The legal system knows this, but pretends it’s not the case anyway.

Or it could be something totally different, IDK. It’s in the lawyers hands now, and I sincerely hope the AA pilots have good ones.

The broader issue of generally not recording interviews to foster open, free, and frank dialogue in the interests of furthering safety doesn’t seem unreasonable.
The problem is they are going to testify and at a minimum it will be recorded by a stenographer but likely will be recorded electronically as they are now under a subpoena. They were not going to lose their careers over this. It was unintentional. They would announce a suspension that would seem harsh for the public and 6 weeks later it would be quietly reduced to 60 days or less. Now however they have positioned themselves as hostile to the FAA. It’s just not a smart thing to do over a unintentional violation.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 06:29 AM
  #245  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,593
Default

Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
APA and American will not win this one with NTSB.
Yep, I tend to agree. And the ONLY reason this won't end well for the pilots is because it has the public's attention. If this did not get out in the public it would have been done with already. But the FAA feels the pressure to do something here.
ImSoSuss is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 06:35 AM
  #246  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by ImSoSuss
Yep, I tend to agree. And the ONLY reason this won't end well for the pilots is because it has the public's attention. If this did not get out in the public it would have been done with already. But the FAA feels the pressure to do something here.
Yup I agree, the court of public opinion will be these guys ultimate undoing. Wait til the media runs hard on the crew and the uneducated travelling masses demand some heads roll, it won’t end well.
PorkyMcFuzz is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 06:53 AM
  #247  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Poolside
Posts: 542
Default

Hmmmmm...I thought if they had filed an ASAP that was accepted, then the only action the FAA could take would be whatever the ASAP ERC decides. Is this incorrect?
Peabody17 is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 07:35 AM
  #248  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
Default

My bet is that they were having a non sterile conversation (contract, training, whatever), blew the taxi clearance, then spent the next however many minutes trying to get their story straight before departing, and now they’re (rightfully) worried and so is APA.

Does this flight have a relief pilot too? Or two person crew?
JayRalstonSmith is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 07:57 AM
  #249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,821
Default

Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
My bet is that they were having a non sterile conversation (contract, training, whatever), blew the taxi clearance, then spent the next however many minutes trying to get their story straight before departing, and now they’re (rightfully) worried and so is APA.

Does this flight have a relief pilot too? Or two person crew?
Boy... a lot of AASSumptions in that narrative.

When it happened, I couldn't believe the flight still departed for Europe, but now, that might be the CVR evidence lost that may ultimately help them?
nene is offline  
Old 02-11-2023, 08:26 AM
  #250  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by nene
Boy... a lot of AASSumptions in that narrative.

When it happened, I couldn't believe the flight still departed for Europe, but now, that might be the CVR evidence lost that may ultimately help them?
Relax Captain Happy. This entire board is built on conjecture and ASSumptions.

Why else would APA be telling them not to give a statement?
JayRalstonSmith is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
fanaticalflyer
United
21
06-06-2018 03:55 PM
trackpilot
Hangar Talk
6
12-10-2007 05:24 PM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM
Sir James
Cargo
2
01-30-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices