Search

Notices

Close Call at JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2023, 01:47 PM
  #221  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,064
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice
With that said, let me ask - have any of you guys who say I don't learn something on behalf of the company unless I'm being paid (fupm) ever sit down and study or review systems, the AOM, or the FOM while at home or elsewhere? Do you folks really only ever open the book while on company time? Always?
This is not apples to apples. Reviewing the AFM and FOM to brush up is maintaining proficiency of items you were already paid to learn. Keeping current is not the same as the company throwing 30 pages of materiel at you and saying "learn this.......for free."

These are 2 completely different situations.
ACEssXfer is offline  
Old 01-27-2023, 03:33 PM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by CADR
all these senior papas “Let me listen in on your PA to the passengers so you don’t say the wrong thing”

When in reality this defeats the purpose of the new changes to prevent the issue that just happened. They want the CA focused on the Taxi so, ya know, they don’t turn the wrong way and nearly cause an accident. But man, so many of these CAs are micro managers and don’t trust their FOs with a simple stupid PA… they forget most of the FOs were regional captains and check airman for years….
Funny you mention that. At SWA the CA dings the cabin and then listens in on the PA for the FA. It’s quite a distraction and more than once the CA has missed a clearance and I’ve had to intervene.

Thats our normal procedure and it’s also done descending through 10k, even when he’s PF.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 01-27-2023, 03:53 PM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by Thatsapproved
I don’t get why the group is upset about or blaming this on the new AOM changes. It took me all of 25 mins to read and retain it all. And I’m slow

Not AA but, I think it boils down to good cockpit management to make sure preflight tasks are done and all heads are up before entering a runway. I fly with lots of captains that call for checklists and even engine starts as we approach the runway.

This May have been a factor after reading the sitrep on the FO.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 01-27-2023, 04:18 PM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,766
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
Y’all done ****ing and moaning allover?
This is a pilot board! So, no!
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 01-27-2023, 04:23 PM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,766
Default

Originally Posted by thrust
He/she/it is a CKA.

FWIW, every single CKA I’ve discussed this topic with don’t agree with R57 at all. They all found the implementation to be nothing short of a debacle, not to mention a clear way to avoid paying the pilots.
There were quite a few items during the merger days that were included in the quarterly CBT (Release, fleet differences etc.). This now is clearly a cheapo attempt. Clearly shows what management thinks of us.
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 01-27-2023, 06:15 PM
  #226  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,171
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
This is a pilot board! So, no!
Fair enough, touché
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 01-30-2023, 06:12 PM
  #227  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 58
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
Thanks chief. It was illustrating a point. I am aware of the DH rules. I also probably DH out of uniform maybe 2x a year: to and from CQT. All 30-50 of the other are in uniform because they are mid trip.

You got me good!!!!!!
Great use of Chief. Yes your point is obvious (but thanks for attempting to point it out again to all us kindergarteners), my point is that you can’t use a non requirement to make your deadhead comparison to unpaid training. You need something real to start with.

it’s like saying “I had a tail strike because I was holding my breath during flare, you know like they make me do in training”. Oh they don’t make me hold my breath during training? Oh ok well you are missing my point obviously cause I know you don’t have to
hold your breath.

LOL

theres a million ways to make your point make sense. What you wrote made no sense, but we have to keep putting ourselves out there to get better, right?
AgressivPressur is offline  
Old 01-31-2023, 02:56 PM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,064
Default

Originally Posted by AgressivPressur
Great use of Chief. Yes your point is obvious (but thanks for attempting to point it out again to all us kindergarteners), my point is that you can’t use a non requirement to make your deadhead comparison to unpaid training. You need something real to start with.

it’s like saying “I had a tail strike because I was holding my breath during flare, you know like they make me do in training”. Oh they don’t make me hold my breath during training? Oh ok well you are missing my point obviously cause I know you don’t have to
hold your breath.

LOL

theres a million ways to make your point make sense. What you wrote made no sense, but we have to keep putting ourselves out there to get better, right?
I don't even know what you said here. If I didn't use the word "uniform" and just said "lets take 50% DH" That would fix it? Nit pick a little more. Everyone sees the point: I want to be paid for working. You wanted to make a quip and ignored the broader topic in order to do just that.

Congrats.

Signed,

"Mr. Non-salaried Professional"
ACEssXfer is offline  
Old 02-02-2023, 10:00 PM
  #229  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 58
Default

Yeah but it’s like it wasn’t enough to suggest 50% for DH. You had to say “in uniform”
to make it sound worse. For the record I have run into more than one pilots who thought they had to DH in uniform, if you were in that minority, well then—it would have been helpful.

There are lots of things we do “without pay” for this or any other airline. We have sign in times beyond the time needed for walk arounds, preflight activities, and briefing. We have required post flight inspections at certain outstations. We have to sometimes wait for all passengers to be off the plane to shut down at end of night. We have to iron our shirts
and tie our shoes. We also have to download electronic pub changes of all varieties before each sequence. Some of them have changes. (Shrug)
For the record I’m happy to get paid for as much as possible but it’s a tough paddle to say everything we do for our employer is and must always be on the clock.

-Chief
AgressivPressur is offline  
Old 02-03-2023, 03:27 AM
  #230  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
I want to be paid as much as possible. I have no problem with folks fighting to be paid more for this type of thing. What I have trouble with the misinformation about the why/how and pilots showing up unprepared.
I guess you can extrapolate this to reading NOTAM's, WX, MX Status... Showing up prepared to work is a basic fundamental of your job description. Just cause you ain't on the clock doesn't mean you should disregard all of your job duties. The folks paying your salary dam sure expect you to show up knowing what has changed in your manual, what taxiway is closed, what the weather is doing today.
Nordhavn is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
fanaticalflyer
United
21
06-06-2018 03:55 PM
trackpilot
Hangar Talk
6
12-10-2007 05:24 PM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM
Sir James
Cargo
2
01-30-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices