Close Call at JFK
#191
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,900
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No I completely get the entire discussion and completely agree. Changing procedures without training is ridiculous.
My comment should of been from days ago but just adding to it now. I don't know what else has been changed but anytime anything changes there should be some sort of training on it.
My comment should of been from days ago but just adding to it now. I don't know what else has been changed but anytime anything changes there should be some sort of training on it.
Cheers 🍻
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#192
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,900
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Didn't AA have a short lived procedure a few years back where the FO would make an announcement...."Remain seated until the CA turns off the seatbelt sign" timed to be made during the last few feet of parking? I seem to remember being in a few jumpseats and thinking how poorly though out that was.
#193
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,596
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No I completely get the entire discussion and completely agree. Changing procedures without training is ridiculous.
My comment should of been from days ago but just adding to it now. I don't know what else has been changed but anytime anything changes there should be some sort of training on it.
My comment should of been from days ago but just adding to it now. I don't know what else has been changed but anytime anything changes there should be some sort of training on it.
#194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyway, too bad you’re so miserable.
#195
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If that’s what you are concluding then you’re missing the entire point of the discussion.
It’s most likely not just the PA that caused the runway incursion. rather, it could most likely be the fact that this was the first flight for all 3 crew members using procedures that AA did not train them for other than by a do-it-yourself bulletin. Which probably caused more than a little confusion while taxiing… and given that incidents and accidents are caused by a chain of events, one could easily see this chain slowly building up until the last hole lined up.
These procedures are brand new to AA pilots, and there is a LOT of stuff that changed, with zero training.
It’s most likely not just the PA that caused the runway incursion. rather, it could most likely be the fact that this was the first flight for all 3 crew members using procedures that AA did not train them for other than by a do-it-yourself bulletin. Which probably caused more than a little confusion while taxiing… and given that incidents and accidents are caused by a chain of events, one could easily see this chain slowly building up until the last hole lined up.
These procedures are brand new to AA pilots, and there is a LOT of stuff that changed, with zero training.
#197
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If that’s what you are concluding then you’re missing the entire point of the discussion.
It’s most likely not just the PA that caused the runway incursion. rather, it could most likely be the fact that this was the first flight for all 3 crew members using procedures that AA did not train them for other than by a do-it-yourself bulletin. Which probably caused more than a little confusion while taxiing… and given that incidents and accidents are caused by a chain of events, one could easily see this chain slowly building up until the last hole lined up.
These procedures are brand new to AA pilots, and there is a LOT of stuff that changed, with zero training.
It’s most likely not just the PA that caused the runway incursion. rather, it could most likely be the fact that this was the first flight for all 3 crew members using procedures that AA did not train them for other than by a do-it-yourself bulletin. Which probably caused more than a little confusion while taxiing… and given that incidents and accidents are caused by a chain of events, one could easily see this chain slowly building up until the last hole lined up.
These procedures are brand new to AA pilots, and there is a LOT of stuff that changed, with zero training.
Zero training is not correct. The bulletin came out a month prior to implementation. At least on the 320, there is an interactive guide, it was in DL and there is a two page summary that pretty much sums them up.
I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.
There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.
As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
#198
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,596
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Zero training is not correct. The bulletin came out a month prior to implementation. At least on the 320, there is an interactive guide, it was in DL and there is a two page summary that pretty much sums them up.
I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.
There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.
As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.
There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.
As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
#199
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,535
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The FOM does mention in it's opening Exterior Lights statement, as I quoted earlier, that "At the captain's discretion, all exterior lights may be used takeoff, approach, and crossing any runway." However, landing lights, taxi light on high, and wing lights are not required to be illuminated while crossing a runway. With that said, I think all of us agree, however, that the airplane should be very well lit while crossing.
![Smile](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#200
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,064
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Zero training is not correct. The bulletin came out a month prior to implementation. At least on the 320, there is an interactive guide, it was in DL and there is a two page summary that pretty much sums them up.
I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.
There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.
As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.
There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.
As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post