Search

Notices

Close Call at JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2023, 12:20 PM
  #191  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,900
Default

Originally Posted by Zerosilver84
No I completely get the entire discussion and completely agree. Changing procedures without training is ridiculous.

My comment should of been from days ago but just adding to it now. I don't know what else has been changed but anytime anything changes there should be some sort of training on it.
We are in agreement.

Cheers 🍻
aa73 is offline  
Old 01-25-2023, 12:21 PM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,900
Default

Originally Posted by b82rez
Didn't AA have a short lived procedure a few years back where the FO would make an announcement...."Remain seated until the CA turns off the seatbelt sign" timed to be made during the last few feet of parking? I seem to remember being in a few jumpseats and thinking how poorly though out that was.
Yep. Thank God it went away. Very poorly thought out
aa73 is offline  
Old 01-25-2023, 12:33 PM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,596
Default

Originally Posted by Zerosilver84
No I completely get the entire discussion and completely agree. Changing procedures without training is ridiculous.

My comment should of been from days ago but just adding to it now. I don't know what else has been changed but anytime anything changes there should be some sort of training on it.
The crew was in the yellow because of the changes (the PA wasn't the only one). The union, rightfully so, has been against training by bulletin since before Boeing management tried to get Max training through by CBT. From what I remember, APA was the only union to publicly fight against that.
ImSoSuss is online now  
Old 01-25-2023, 03:52 PM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Feel better now? My day hasn't changed now that I know I lack your approval.

Also, you could have said that all in one post. Welcome to the internet, gramps. Follow me for more tips.
Yeah but then I wouldn’t have been able to waste your time!

Anyway, too bad you’re so miserable.
JayRalstonSmith is offline  
Old 01-25-2023, 03:55 PM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
If that’s what you are concluding then you’re missing the entire point of the discussion.

It’s most likely not just the PA that caused the runway incursion. rather, it could most likely be the fact that this was the first flight for all 3 crew members using procedures that AA did not train them for other than by a do-it-yourself bulletin. Which probably caused more than a little confusion while taxiing… and given that incidents and accidents are caused by a chain of events, one could easily see this chain slowly building up until the last hole lined up.

These procedures are brand new to AA pilots, and there is a LOT of stuff that changed, with zero training.
Except you know what didn’t change? Following a basic taxi instruction to the runway.
JayRalstonSmith is offline  
Old 01-25-2023, 04:02 PM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,031
Default

Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
Except you know what didn’t change? Following a basic taxi instruction to the runway.
especially one you read back.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 01-25-2023, 05:26 PM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
If that’s what you are concluding then you’re missing the entire point of the discussion.

It’s most likely not just the PA that caused the runway incursion. rather, it could most likely be the fact that this was the first flight for all 3 crew members using procedures that AA did not train them for other than by a do-it-yourself bulletin. Which probably caused more than a little confusion while taxiing… and given that incidents and accidents are caused by a chain of events, one could easily see this chain slowly building up until the last hole lined up.

These procedures are brand new to AA pilots, and there is a LOT of stuff that changed, with zero training.

Zero training is not correct. The bulletin came out a month prior to implementation. At least on the 320, there is an interactive guide, it was in DL and there is a two page summary that pretty much sums them up.

I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.

There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.

As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 01-26-2023, 07:19 AM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,596
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Zero training is not correct. The bulletin came out a month prior to implementation. At least on the 320, there is an interactive guide, it was in DL and there is a two page summary that pretty much sums them up.

I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.

There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.

As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
Mission hacker alert. You fresh out of the Military?
ImSoSuss is online now  
Old 01-26-2023, 07:47 AM
  #199  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,535
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
isn’t that for day time though? Pretty sure it’s all required at night
Just splitting hairs here, but they are not required per the FOM. The FOM specifies some day/night circumstances for the Nav lights and Taxi lights, but not the Landing lights. The Landing lights are required on "after takeoff clearance is received and the aircraft is on the active runway (across the hold line)"

The FOM does mention in it's opening Exterior Lights statement, as I quoted earlier, that "At the captain's discretion, all exterior lights may be used takeoff, approach, and crossing any runway." However, landing lights, taxi light on high, and wing lights are not required to be illuminated while crossing a runway. With that said, I think all of us agree, however, that the airplane should be very well lit while crossing.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 01-26-2023, 09:32 AM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,064
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Zero training is not correct. The bulletin came out a month prior to implementation. At least on the 320, there is an interactive guide, it was in DL and there is a two page summary that pretty much sums them up.

I hear many complain about how it was rolled out, but few suggestions on how it should have been done.

There is a page for feedback on the last page of the bulletin and they are being considered.

As professional pilots it is up to us to do all we can to show up prepared.
How much were you paid to review the bulletins?
ACEssXfer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
fanaticalflyer
United
21
06-06-2018 03:55 PM
trackpilot
Hangar Talk
6
12-10-2007 05:24 PM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM
Sir James
Cargo
2
01-30-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices