Search

Notices

Close Call at JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2023, 06:25 AM
  #151  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,973
Default

Originally Posted by disenchantMINT
Is "who gets the blame?" really the important part when two planes collide on a runway and there was a clear safety deficit on the part of the "innocent" party which, removed, could have prevented it? The other guy does have a solid point and hopefully procedural changes come about at Delta as a result. Use of a HUD for night VMC takeoff at a major airport is a net negative to safe operation.
Hush. Nobody is allowed to denigrate the almighty Delta Air Lines or Delta Air Lines Pilots. They have an impeccable safety record, have never killed anyone, and all of their procedures are above reproach. Just ask one of them. On guard.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 06:26 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 2,256
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Hush. Nobody is allowed to denigrate the almighty Delta Air Lines or Delta Air Lines Pilots. They have an impeccable safety record, have never killed anyone, and all of their procedures are above reproach. Just ask one of them. On guard.
You’re blaming the crew who followed takeoff clearance rather than the jet with 3 pilots up front who crossed the wrong runway and didn’t have the foggiest even after the fact. Inferiority complex?
PilotBases is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 06:29 AM
  #153  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,973
Default

Originally Posted by PilotBases
You’re blaming the crew who followed takeoff clearance rather than the jet with 3 pilots up front who crossed the wrong runway and didn’t have the foggiest even after the fact. Inferiority complex?
Yes, it's definitely a great idea to take off with a 777 bearing down on you at full taxi speed because, shrug, well the controller cleared you, your responsibility has ended.

The captain never saw them because he was focused on a HUD. The FO was heads down. That's a procedure that needs to be looked at. If the controller hadn't caught it, we'd be looking at Tenerife. Plenty of blame to go around, not just AA
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 06:44 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Yes, it's definitely a great idea to take off with a 777 bearing down on you at full taxi speed because, shrug, well the controller cleared you, your responsibility has ended.

The captain never saw them because he was focused on a HUD. The FO was heads down. That's a procedure that needs to be looked at. If the controller hadn't caught it, we'd be looking at Tenerife. Plenty of blame to go around, not just AA
damn you seem to know a lot about this event
OOfff is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 06:49 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Yes, it's definitely a great idea to take off with a 777 bearing down on you at full taxi speed because, shrug, well the controller cleared you, your responsibility has ended.

The captain never saw them because he was focused on a HUD. The FO was heads down. That's a procedure that needs to be looked at. If the controller hadn't caught it, we'd be looking at Tenerife. Plenty of blame to go around, not just AA
Yeah, I’m fairly certain when all the investigations are done, the AA pilots are gonna be the ones going through remedial training. Your gaslighting attempts are noted.
Myfingershurt is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 06:51 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,410
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Yes, it's definitely a great idea to take off with a 777 bearing down on you at full taxi speed because, shrug, well the controller cleared you, your responsibility has ended.

The captain never saw them because he was focused on a HUD. The FO was heads down. That's a procedure that needs to be looked at. If the controller hadn't caught it, we'd be looking at Tenerife. Plenty of blame to go around, not just AA
I suspect there are two things you have never done. The first is use a HUD. HUD’s are focused at infinity so your eyes are set to see at a distance not 6 inches away. You will see far more outside with a HUD than shifting scan from inside to outside the aircraft with rapidly changing focal lengths.
The second thing it appears you have never done is takeoff on 4L at night during a peak timeframe. The 737 crew would have been looking at a sea of lights from numerous aircraft near the 777 backlit by multiple terminals. No one is going to see a 777 approaching 4L 4000 feet away in those conditions. Even if it were possible to see them you would not expect them to cross. The first real opportunity to see the 777 would have been as it actually crossed the runway and moved into a darker area clear of the other aircraft and terminals. It appears they did in fact see the 777 and were already aborting when tower called. As far as the 777 bearing down on them it crossed the runway heading 90 degrees off.
What you should be asking is how a experienced JFK crew departing with a very commonly used runway departure configuration thought they were going off 31L on a flight to Europe. You should also ask why they then departed losing the CVR data which would have been a critical tool in understanding what happened and perhaps prevented a future accident.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 06:53 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: NYC Based 320 CA
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Yes, it's definitely a great idea to take off with a 777 bearing down on you at full taxi speed because, shrug, well the controller cleared you, your responsibility has ended.

The captain never saw them because he was focused on a HUD. The FO was heads down. That's a procedure that needs to be looked at. If the controller hadn't caught it, we'd be looking at Tenerife. Plenty of blame to go around, not just AA
You seem angry. Did you not get an acceptance letter from Virginia Avenue? Why so worked up?
JayRalstonSmith is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 07:12 AM
  #158  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,973
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy/OOfff
damn you seem to know a lot about this event
I don't fly 777s.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I suspect there are two things you have never done. The first is use a HUD. HUD’s are focused at infinity so your eyes are set to see at a distance not 6 inches away. You will see far more outside with a HUD than shifting scan from inside to outside the aircraft with rapidly changing focal lengths.
The second thing it appears you have never done is takeoff on 4L at night during a peak timeframe. The 737 crew would have been looking at a sea of lights from numerous aircraft near the 777 backlit by multiple terminals. No one is going to see a 777 approaching 4L 4000 feet away in those conditions. Even if it were possible to see them you would not expect them to cross. The first real opportunity to see the 777 would have been as it actually crossed the runway and moved into a darker area clear of the other aircraft and terminals. It appears they did in fact see the 777 and were already aborting when tower called. As far as the 777 bearing down on them it crossed the runway heading 90 degrees off.
What you should be asking is how a experienced JFK crew departing with a very commonly used runway departure configuration thought they were going off 31L on a flight to Europe. You should also ask why they then departed losing the CVR data which would have been a critical tool in understanding what happened and perhaps prevented a future accident.
As CBreezy/OOfff says, "damn you seem know a lot about this event".

Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
You seem angry. Did you not get an acceptance letter from Virginia Avenue? Why so worked up?
You're probably too young but ever heard of an airline called Comair? But thanks for exuding more Delta Pilots Superiority for the rest of us to make fun of. I know this will shock you, but not everyone wants to work for your air line.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 07:20 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
I don't fly 777s.



As CBreezy/OOfff says, "damn you seem know a lot about this event".



You're probably too young but ever heard of an airline called Comair? But thanks for exuding more Delta Pilots Superiority for the rest of us to make fun of. I know this will shock you, but not everyone wants to work for your air line.
have you ever flown with a 737 HUD, or flown off 4L at night?
OOfff is offline  
Old 01-23-2023, 07:25 AM
  #160  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,973
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
have you ever flown with a 737 HUD, or flown off 4L at night?
yes. yes. Next.

Glad you've once again decided to be the self appointed investigator and ruler of the inter webs. Yawn. Don't you have a TA to be reading through?

Best thing about trolling you Delta boys and girls is that you cannot resist responding. It's just too easy. Hence why we hear all the BS on guard up and down the east coast. But keep embarrassing yourselves exuding your feelings of superiority. I can count to 3 before one of you does it on here any time anyone not at Delta mentions Delta.
Margaritaville is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colonel S
United
25
05-04-2022 03:46 AM
fanaticalflyer
United
21
06-06-2018 03:55 PM
trackpilot
Hangar Talk
6
12-10-2007 05:24 PM
hyperone
Cargo
14
10-27-2007 05:28 AM
Sir James
Cargo
2
01-30-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices