Jumpseat Battle Brewing
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: Guppy
Posts: 764
its also relevant because the travel policies were all known well before anybody took a job anywhere. The WO’s all pay lower, have worse schedules, and in some cases much longer upgrades. They as WO do however come before independent contractors for the JS.
there are benefits advantages and disadvantages depending who you decided to go work for.
there are benefits advantages and disadvantages depending who you decided to go work for.
and you do business directly supporting two of AA’s largest competitors, so what? At least those full codeshare partners aren’t out supporting the others like you do.
AA.com is putting passengers on those codeshare flights, and unlike with you, not having to pay an independent contractor to do it.
AA.com is putting passengers on those codeshare flights, and unlike with you, not having to pay an independent contractor to do it.
Moreover, don't blame the regional for playing the game that the majors created. I'd happily see AA take back all the regional flying. The fact AA pays us is another strawman and entirely irrelevant.
your missing the point. They shouldn’t be going down that pathway at all. There are no proper channels to argue a business interest in what is purely a pilot benefit. You’re opening a door that should not be opened. Business interests like who an OAL pilot flys for have no place in jumpseat policy. You are either owned, or you’re not. It’s that simple. If they can interject a business interest now, it opens the door to more business interests being added later.
I was an ALPA MEC rep two times Republic Pilots tried this same crap. It was as wrong then as it is now. So, yeah... I may not have read this newest version of the same complaint, but I’ll guarantee you it is exactly that, the same complaint.
smarten up. Keep the business interest argument out of jumpseating. That’s a door nobody should open.
smarten up. Keep the business interest argument out of jumpseating. That’s a door nobody should open.
Not sure why you think I or anyone else am not doing that. I think we're all grateful things are trending in the right direction.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 729
Oh and they talk about nonrev priority because that totally matters when talking about the JS
Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
#83
APA official position is AAG pilots should continue to receive priority on all AA branded YX JS while YX pilots don't get the same reciprocity. They also argue in order for YX to receive reciporcity they are now entitled to priority even on UA and DL branded flights. If YX can't provide that then they aren't worthy.
Oh and they talk about nonrev priority because that totally matters when talking about the JS
Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
Oh and they talk about nonrev priority because that totally matters when talking about the JS
Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
seriously, you are welcome to priority on all your own branded flights, how many would that be again? Yeah, zero.
stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
what RAH wants is industry standard. If AAG pilots/APA are so opposed to that they should have no problem being considered OAL on RAH flights. You can’t have it both ways
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 729
seriously, you are welcome to priority on all your own branded flights, how many would that be again? Yeah, zero.
stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
No, an ex ENY pilot (union rep) who got fired and now flies for Omni (I think) is arguing that, just for some context.
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Cujo isn’t even an AA pilot, he is OAL on AA, that may give you a good perspective of what his intentions are.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#90
Throw me a bone.
AA pilot and Republic pilot show up for JS on DL. It goes to Republic?
AA pilot and Republic pilot show up for JS on UAL. It goes to Republic?
AA pilots JS on AA, got that one.
AA and Republic on non-metal Feeders to UAL and DAL, any priority outside own metal?
Thanks, don't commute.
AA pilot and Republic pilot show up for JS on DL. It goes to Republic?
AA pilot and Republic pilot show up for JS on UAL. It goes to Republic?
AA pilots JS on AA, got that one.
AA and Republic on non-metal Feeders to UAL and DAL, any priority outside own metal?
Thanks, don't commute.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post