Search

Notices

Jumpseat Battle Brewing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2021, 03:09 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: Guppy
Posts: 764
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
non-sequitur
if you’d like to trade with an Envoy, PSA, or PDT guy, go ahead.
Not really. AA guys are complaining that we have benefits on three airlines as justification for why we shouldn't have priority over offline jumpseaters. If they'd like to trade their D2s and pay for my SA5X, AAC, and S3C priorities and pay, I'll make that trade.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
of course it’s relevant. Your travel benefits are already superior to both at mainline and WO.
None of them can put family on United or Delta with anything other than a ZED, which your status comes well ahead of.
I wholeheartedly disagree, as does just about everyone I've spoken to at a contract carrier. I'd much rather have D1s/D2s at one airline than priority slightly above buddy passes at three. 9 times out of 10, that's going to work better for you in terms of getting where you need to go. It's certainly nice during IRROPS, though, I'll grant you that.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
its also relevant because the travel policies were all known well before anybody took a job anywhere. The WO’s all pay lower, have worse schedules, and in some cases much longer upgrades. They as WO do however come before independent contractors for the JS.
there are benefits advantages and disadvantages depending who you decided to go work for.
And no one at Republic is trying to change that.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
and you do business directly supporting two of AA’s largest competitors, so what? At least those full codeshare partners aren’t out supporting the others like you do.
AA.com is putting passengers on those codeshare flights, and unlike with you, not having to pay an independent contractor to do it.
Acting like AA isn't a direct stakeholder in Republic isn't a good way to get your message across. It's pathological fiction to argue that Republic isn't more important to AA's operation than either B6 or AS in terms of contributions to the bottom line.

Moreover, don't blame the regional for playing the game that the majors created. I'd happily see AA take back all the regional flying. The fact AA pays us is another strawman and entirely irrelevant.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
your missing the point. They shouldn’t be going down that pathway at all. There are no proper channels to argue a business interest in what is purely a pilot benefit. You’re opening a door that should not be opened. Business interests like who an OAL pilot flys for have no place in jumpseat policy. You are either owned, or you’re not. It’s that simple. If they can interject a business interest now, it opens the door to more business interests being added later.
You're begging the question. You have to prove your assertion that being owned or not is the only metric by which to determine jumpseat policy, and that's an uphill battle considering the way AAG does it is wholly outside the norm in the industry. It's a convenient assertion for an airline that has three wholly-owned regionals, but is totally unfounded industry-wide.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
I was an ALPA MEC rep two times Republic Pilots tried this same crap. It was as wrong then as it is now. So, yeah... I may not have read this newest version of the same complaint, but I’ll guarantee you it is exactly that, the same complaint.

smarten up. Keep the business interest argument out of jumpseating. That’s a door nobody should open.
To use your same argument, Republic was entirely within their right to remove any priority of AAG carriers over offline because they're not owned by Republic. That was at least one of the instances you mentioned, and once again came about after attempts to engage AAG about making changes that are mutually beneficial. The fact that you just dismiss it out of hand leads me to believe you were one of those not even willing to engage Republic in dialogue. I have no idea how long ago you were at (presumably) Envoy, but the approach taken at AAG, until extremely recently, was petulant, disrespectful, and entirely unprofessional. I'm glad to see things are slowly changing, but they're only changing because Republic has once again been forced to ask the question. Reasonable people can disagree on some things, but it's unacceptable for a professional organization to be unwilling to engage in a dialogue with their peers.

Originally Posted by Cujo665
honestly, hiring is picking up again. You’re time would be better spent working to get out of the regionals.
Not sure why you think I or anyone else am not doing that. I think we're all grateful things are trending in the right direction.
Longhornmaniac8 is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 03:21 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It was a joking metaphor. But if you can actually prove he's lying, I'll address it.







I can JS on all YX flights, why can't you?
APA official position is AAG pilots should continue to receive priority on all AA branded YX JS while YX pilots don't get the same reciprocity. They also argue in order for YX to receive reciporcity they are now entitled to priority even on UA and DL branded flights. If YX can't provide that then they aren't worthy.

Oh and they talk about nonrev priority because that totally matters when talking about the JS

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
magnus0322 is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 04:17 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,255
Default

Originally Posted by magnus0322
APA official position is AAG pilots should continue to receive priority on all AA branded YX JS while YX pilots don't get the same reciprocity. They also argue in order for YX to receive reciporcity they are now entitled to priority even on UA and DL branded flights. If YX can't provide that then they aren't worthy.

Oh and they talk about nonrev priority because that totally matters when talking about the JS

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
seriously, you are welcome to priority on all your own branded flights, how many would that be again? Yeah, zero.

stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 04:24 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,681
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
seriously, you are welcome to priority on all your own branded flights, how many would that be again? Yeah, zero.

stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
just like how now UA and DL management view the JS as a way for company business since they allow FFD carriers higher priority over OAL. /s 🙄🙄

what RAH wants is industry standard. If AAG pilots/APA are so opposed to that they should have no problem being considered OAL on RAH flights. You can’t have it both ways
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 05:08 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
seriously, you are welcome to priority on all your own branded flights, how many would that be again? Yeah, zero.



stop trying to inject business considerations into jumpseating. The company should NEVER view that jumpseat as a business consideration. Worse, is a pilot group trying to make the JS a business consideration. Do you not even see the nose peeking under the tent? Don’t give them any ideas.
But AAG pilots should receive priority correct? Or are you advocating for AAG pilots to be D6U on YX JS? Because if you are then I'm perfectly fine with that. We are D6U on AAG metal.

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
magnus0322 is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 05:09 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Default

Originally Posted by Longhornmaniac8
Not really. AA guys are complaining that we have benefits on three airlines as justification for why we shouldn't have priority over offline jumpseaters.
No, an ex ENY pilot (union rep) who got fired and now flies for Omni (I think) is arguing that, just for some context.
havick206 is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 05:25 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,789
Default

Man am I glad I am getting out of the AA system.
Cyio is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 05:28 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
Man am I glad I am getting out of the AA system.
Not toxic enough for you?
BurnerAccount69 is offline  
Old 03-25-2021, 07:34 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by magnus0322
But AAG pilots should receive priority correct? Or are you advocating for AAG pilots to be D6U on YX JS? Because if you are then I'm perfectly fine with that. We are D6U on AAG metal.

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk

Cujo isn’t even an AA pilot, he is OAL on AA, that may give you a good perspective of what his intentions are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tring is offline  
Old 03-26-2021, 09:03 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dolphinflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 677
Default

Throw me a bone.
AA pilot and Republic pilot show up for JS on DL. It goes to Republic?
AA pilot and Republic pilot show up for JS on UAL. It goes to Republic?
AA pilots JS on AA, got that one.
AA and Republic on non-metal Feeders to UAL and DAL, any priority outside own metal?

Thanks, don't commute.
Dolphinflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Al Czervik
Republic Airways
500
10-20-2019 06:47 AM
LeineLodge
American
55
12-16-2013 02:21 PM
Husker4Life
Major
8
01-31-2013 07:00 AM
Big3win
Major
203
04-16-2009 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices