Jumpseat Battle Brewing
#581
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
I’m confident that if your union approached APA and offered us priority on every RAH jet, they’d be much more open to negotiations. Trouble is youre offering priority on about 50% or less jets in your small regional airline fleet, and don’t understand what’s wrong.
#582
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
You are arguing that you won’t really have priority on all of our flights because you aren’t using it all the time. It’s ludicrous and funny that you think that’s how anything has ever worked. Ever. If you have the ability to show up and get priority on any flight you show up for, guess what you have? Your use of such priority means nothing
See my reply above to El Peso for more detail.
Now you still have the ability to not like mutual priority (option 1) and that's your right. But as that only leaves mutual OAL (option 2), what then is your grounds for complaint over it?
#583
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
I'm sure you can see why this would be untenable. You're asking for priority above United and Delta on flights branded for them, without anything equal going the other way. Simply you win, they lose, 100% of the time. Nice. I know you're just being flippant and not proposing it seriously, and using it as a demonstration why option 1 (mutual priority) is equally untenable... But that's simply not so. The same reasoning doesn't go the other way. Republic can have mutual priority with you the same as they have with U and D, where overall everybody is equal. You get priority on 1/3 of their flights (U and D getting the other 2/3) while they have access to all of yours but in practice only use priority on about 1/3 of yours (commuting on U and D the other 2/3 of the time).
I addressed this in post 563. (Except using half as the ratio and not a third. Speaking in broad generalities here.)
I addressed this in post 563. (Except using half as the ratio and not a third. Speaking in broad generalities here.)
#584
So ludicrous and funny, that it's the system at the United and Delta networks, and "working" just fine. And some from your side have suggested that this has been a long-running oversight there which has only survived because no one important has noticed. This is just silly.
See my reply above to El Peso for more detail.
Now you still have the ability to not like mutual priority (option 1) and that's your right. But as that only leaves mutual OAL (option 2), what then is your grounds for complaint over it?
See my reply above to El Peso for more detail.
Now you still have the ability to not like mutual priority (option 1) and that's your right. But as that only leaves mutual OAL (option 2), what then is your grounds for complaint over it?
Im laughing at the fact that you think your usage has any bearing on the agreement. No one cares how much you use it, they care what the agreement is.
I realize this seems lopsided initially, but is offset by the fact that half the time, they are commuting on those other major networks. So in practice, they would be taking priority on 50%, not 100%, of your flights. (And as a reminder, that priority would still be 100% below you and below your WO regionals.)
#585
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Here it is again, you can’t hide from it. That sh!t is funny
Last edited by vessbot; 05-20-2021 at 02:36 PM.
#586
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
This might be more believable, if it wasn't already in place and ticking beautifully at the other airlines (under the interpretation that the partial usage by the regional pilots, offsets the partial availability of branded regional flights.)
Offering mutual priority on one third of flights in exchange for the same, (same as what's in place at the rest of the industry) does not seem like too much to ask, to me. But it's still your prerogative to decide that it is. But if you reject option 1 (mutual priority) then I'm asking you the same thing I asked Sanicom, what's your grounds for complaint over option 2 (mutual OAL?)
What you’re actually asking of us is to bend a lot to satisfy your request. We get priority on whatever number of Rah planes that are operating on Eagle, and you get priority on every single AA airplane. Well you’re being told no. You don’t have enough to offer for what you want in exchange.
Last edited by vessbot; 05-20-2021 at 02:48 PM.
#587
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
This might be more believable, if it wasn't already in place and ticking beautifully at the other airlines (under the interpretation that the partial usage by the regional pilots, offsets the partial availability of branded regional flights.)
Offering mutual priority on one third of flights in exchange for the same, (same as what's in place at the rest of the industry) does not seem like too much to ask, to me. But it's still your prerogative to decide that it is. But if you reject option 1 (mutual priority) then I'm asking you the same thing I asked Sanicom, what's your ground for complaint over option 2 (mutual OAL?)
Offering mutual priority on one third of flights in exchange for the same, (same as what's in place at the rest of the industry) does not seem like too much to ask, to me. But it's still your prerogative to decide that it is. But if you reject option 1 (mutual priority) then I'm asking you the same thing I asked Sanicom, what's your ground for complaint over option 2 (mutual OAL?)
#588
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Just because it’s ticking along beautifully at delta and united doesn’t mean it’s reciprocal. They gave you a huge windfall, but that’s their prerogative. Now you think it’s just standard and normal way of doing business. It’s like that buddy you lend money to a bunch of times. Then the one time you tell him no, they look at you like you just did something wrong. Enjoy your windfall at delta and united, APA told you no.
Second, a new question: How do you figure that United and Delta (companies or pilots) are losing, in any way, on that arrangement?
Third, a repeated question: if you reject mutual priority, what's your grounds for complaint over mutual OAL?
#589
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
First, a reminder that I'm not a Republic pilot.
Second, a new question: How do you figure that United and Delta (companies or pilots) are losing, in any way, on that arrangement?
Third, a repeated question: if you reject mutual priority, what's your grounds for complaint over mutual OAL?
Second, a new question: How do you figure that United and Delta (companies or pilots) are losing, in any way, on that arrangement?
Third, a repeated question: if you reject mutual priority, what's your grounds for complaint over mutual OAL?
2. When you say mutual I believe you’re talking about just aa giving priority on 1/3 of our flights? How on earth would you even track that or separate it up? By airframe? By Airports? And just the idea that AA will have to try to code that into Decs stops the idea right in its tracks. That why I didn’t even bother to address that suggestion before.
#590
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
1. Easy. A Rah pilot shows up to a delta airplane and gets priority. A delta pilot shows up to a Rah airplane (operating as United Express), and gets no such priority.
2. When you say mutual I believe you’re talking about just aa giving priority on 1/3 of our flights? How on earth would you even track that or separate it up? By airframe? By Airports? And just the idea that AA will have to try to code that into Decs stops the idea right in its tracks. That why I didn’t even bother to address that suggestion before.
2. When you say mutual I believe you’re talking about just aa giving priority on 1/3 of our flights? How on earth would you even track that or separate it up? By airframe? By Airports? And just the idea that AA will have to try to code that into Decs stops the idea right in its tracks. That why I didn’t even bother to address that suggestion before.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post