Jumpseat Battle Brewing
05-03-2021, 06:17 AM
#192
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Dobbs18
please don’t mix travel benefits with jumpseat reciprocal. It muddies peoples understanding of the situation
please don’t mix travel benefits with jumpseat reciprocal. It muddies peoples understanding of the situation
05-03-2021, 06:27 AM
#193
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,448
Dobbs18
please don’t mix travel benefits with jumpseat reciprocal. It muddies peoples understanding of the situation
please don’t mix travel benefits with jumpseat reciprocal. It muddies peoples understanding of the situation
05-03-2021, 07:13 AM
#197
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: B777 CA, Ret.
Posts: 77
I'm thinking the only way to level they field is:
Own airline
Wholly owned
Other airlines
Otherwise you get too deep in the mud on who flies what livery, who bought/leased what airframe, on what cert, etc.
Own airline
Wholly owned
Other airlines
Otherwise you get too deep in the mud on who flies what livery, who bought/leased what airframe, on what cert, etc.
05-03-2021, 07:25 AM
#198
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
lol okay well those two things can’t exist simultaneously so something is being left out.
Here’s the facts. All cass approved, non-wholly owned reciprocal agreement carriers are in the same category currently. That means Mesa and RAH too. If you get what you’re asking for, an increase in priority, then by simple logic you’d have to move above Mesa. If I’m missing something feel free to expand beyond simply saying “no”.
Here’s the facts. All cass approved, non-wholly owned reciprocal agreement carriers are in the same category currently. That means Mesa and RAH too. If you get what you’re asking for, an increase in priority, then by simple logic you’d have to move above Mesa. If I’m missing something feel free to expand beyond simply saying “no”.
05-03-2021, 07:33 AM
#199
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: Jumpseat
Posts: 92
lol okay well those two things can’t exist simultaneously so something is being left out.
Here’s the facts. All cass approved, non-wholly owned reciprocal agreement carriers are in the same category currently. That means Mesa and RAH too. If you get what you’re asking for, an increase in priority, then by simple logic you’d have to move above Mesa. If I’m missing something feel free to expand beyond simply saying “no”.
Here’s the facts. All cass approved, non-wholly owned reciprocal agreement carriers are in the same category currently. That means Mesa and RAH too. If you get what you’re asking for, an increase in priority, then by simple logic you’d have to move above Mesa. If I’m missing something feel free to expand beyond simply saying “no”.
we are asking that rah, Mesa, and Skywest be moved up to aac fdj toc. Below own metal then AAG/wo.
here... the first minute covers it.
https://youtu.be/6vndXYjXePM
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
