AA Non-Rev travel
#111
I’m in agreement with Frip on this and will add one more good reason. If the family was put at a lower level, you’d see more and more employees traveling with them (when they weren’t going on the trip) just to get them at the higher level. Adding 1 more non rev to the flight and wasting that employees time.
#112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,272
Way bigger fish to fry IMO. Out of my commute city I took screen captures of a family who had listed and checked in for three different sequential flights on the same city pair. At least for first one, they never even bothered to show up. IMO if you list and check in but don't show up, you should lose travel privileges for a month. This totally screws over those who would potentially try for the flight but see they have zero chance (assuming you show up).
For the courtesy of others listings should be canceled xx hours ahead of time if not used.
For the courtesy of others listings should be canceled xx hours ahead of time if not used.
#113
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
No, they lose it when they turn 24, I think they have to be in school to keep it after 18, not sure.
I’m in agreement with Frip on this and will add one more good reason. If the family was put at a lower level, you’d see more and more employees traveling with them (when they weren’t going on the trip) just to get them at the higher level. Adding 1 more non rev to the flight and wasting that employees time.
I’m in agreement with Frip on this and will add one more good reason. If the family was put at a lower level, you’d see more and more employees traveling with them (when they weren’t going on the trip) just to get them at the higher level. Adding 1 more non rev to the flight and wasting that employees time.
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 398
For boarding priority, kids retain the same status until 2359 on their 24th birthday, and their status as a student or not no longer matters.
For the IRS at 18 or at 23 if a full time student they are considered “dependents”. After age 18 if not enrolled full time or after 23 in any case then the employee is liable for federal income taxes on the “Imputed Income” - which is some mystical number representing the “value of standby travel”.
Dependents do not have “priority over an active employee” except by virtue of check in time which is a free-for-all that IMO needs to be changed to Company Seniority Date or by the use of a D1- which the active employee has equal opportunity to exercise.
So far as the multiple listings, yes, it is against the rules and yes it is also unnecessary as one can be rolled over to the next flight or a different routing or even a different destination indefinitely, and yes any listing that is not going to be used should be cancelled and yes violators of the rules should be dealt with accordingly.
I want to believe that most of the double listing is done out of ignorance and a feeling of being proactive rather than out of malice, which is no excuse.
How do you get a half million people to all read understand and follow the rules?
For the IRS at 18 or at 23 if a full time student they are considered “dependents”. After age 18 if not enrolled full time or after 23 in any case then the employee is liable for federal income taxes on the “Imputed Income” - which is some mystical number representing the “value of standby travel”.
Dependents do not have “priority over an active employee” except by virtue of check in time which is a free-for-all that IMO needs to be changed to Company Seniority Date or by the use of a D1- which the active employee has equal opportunity to exercise.
So far as the multiple listings, yes, it is against the rules and yes it is also unnecessary as one can be rolled over to the next flight or a different routing or even a different destination indefinitely, and yes any listing that is not going to be used should be cancelled and yes violators of the rules should be dealt with accordingly.
I want to believe that most of the double listing is done out of ignorance and a feeling of being proactive rather than out of malice, which is no excuse.
How do you get a half million people to all read understand and follow the rules?
#115
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,633
Way bigger fish to fry IMO. Out of my commute city I took screen captures of a family who had listed and checked in for three different sequential flights on the same city pair. At least for first one, they never even bothered to show up. IMO if you list and check in but don't show up, you should lose travel privileges for a month. This totally screws over those who would potentially try for the flight but see they have zero chance (assuming you show up).
For the courtesy of others listings should be canceled xx hours ahead of time if not used.
For the courtesy of others listings should be canceled xx hours ahead of time if not used.
Some stations are better than others, but one is consistently, and by far, the worst.
#118
Is it great? Not always. But it’s not worthless either.
#119
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,633
Positive space regional crewmembers? That's the smallest group of people ever known to man in the AA system.
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Had 4 Eagle pilots on D1's ahead of me and the wife returning from a European destination last week. Smallest group or not, they're obviously using the benefit just like everyone else. We barely made it on. That's ok. I'm sure one day I'll want to D1 the family to Chattanooga and get to nonrev on some Eagle metal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post