Search

Notices

AA Class Drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2018, 06:07 PM
  #631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Well I wrote up a long response but the internet took it away from me...

Short answer is at $1,500/month lease rate vs $150k on the low end for a 319, the S80 runs around $65k a month cheaper on operating costs but as the fleet gets smaller that will increase. Fuel would have to go to $2.50/gal (+/-) to reach parity.

It's a great airplane to use as a reserve fleet because it costs nothing to just park if they don't need it.

I heard about the Frontier planes in early Feb, where have you guys been?!?

I've also heard that they plan on contracting with Delta's sim to do stall training to possibly get around their drop dead date. IMO the company is scrambling to come up with a solution and they are going to pay out the nose for it unfortunately...unlike Delta's cheap $19m C series airplanes...
Frontier planes? What’s the story with that?
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 06:14 PM
  #632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,316
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Frontier planes? What’s the story with that?
They want 319’s to fill the gap being left by retiring Super 80’s. They are looking for used ones.
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 06:56 PM
  #633  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
They want 319’s to fill the gap being left by retiring Super 80’s. They are looking for used ones.
Isn’t that what the huge order of 319, 321 and 738’s were for?
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 02-28-2018, 08:40 PM
  #634  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,448
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Isn’t that what the huge order of 319, 321 and 738’s were for?
There are no 319s on order
Saabs is offline  
Old 03-01-2018, 04:43 AM
  #635  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,524
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Isn’t that what the huge order of 319, 321 and 738’s were for?
Rumor is that AB isn’t interested in dealing with 319 pricing. It just takes away a 321 production spot. That’s allegedly part of the push towards finding used 319’s.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 03-01-2018, 04:56 AM
  #636  
Line Holder
 
Slowmover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
the S80 runs around $65k a month cheaper on operating costs
Thank you for the replies! Just for my education, how is an S80 cheaper to run than a 319?
Slowmover is offline  
Old 03-01-2018, 05:08 AM
  #637  
Unfaithfully yours, Hank
 
MarineGrunt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: All
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by Slowmover
Thank you for the replies! Just for my education, how is an S80 cheaper to run than a 319?
They’re paid off.
MarineGrunt is offline  
Old 03-01-2018, 11:41 AM
  #638  
Line Holder
 
Slowmover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by MarineGrunt
They’re paid off.
Got it! Thanks.
Slowmover is offline  
Old 03-01-2018, 03:11 PM
  #639  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,270
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Rumor is that AB isn’t interested in dealing with 319 pricing. It just takes away a 321 production spot. That’s allegedly part of the push towards finding used 319’s.
It has less to do with Airbus not wanting to produce but more to do with acquisition costs...a 319 is $5m less to purchase than a 321. Makes way more sense to buy the 321.

There was a time not too long ago when Airbus couldn't give away the 319s they were producing, as with anything timing is everything. Hopefully they find some good deals, would be pretty nice to have a larger fleet and have to hire for growth taken away from the regionals.

I do wonder about the 195E2 but so far nothing has come up about it. I think the only reason US had them is because they were forced to put them on mainline, they were gunning for scope relief.
Name User is offline  
Old 03-02-2018, 05:18 AM
  #640  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Professional Eugoogoolizer at the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can’t Read Good
Posts: 1,191
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
It has less to do with Airbus not wanting to produce but more to do with acquisition costs...a 319 is $5m less to purchase than a 321. Makes way more sense to buy the 321.

There was a time not too long ago when Airbus couldn't give away the 319s they were producing, as with anything timing is everything. Hopefully they find some good deals, would be pretty nice to have a larger fleet and have to hire for growth taken away from the regionals.

I do wonder about the 195E2 but so far nothing has come up about it. I think the only reason US had them is because they were forced to put them on mainline, they were gunning for scope relief.
I think its only a matter of time till they have to place an order for something... embrear, csearies or Mitsubishi.. I think it will be embrear or cseries and its going to be a Boeing vs airbus battle hence why airbus just bought the cseries and Boeing is making a play for embrear. The 100 to 130 seat market is going to explode in the next few years as the regionals continue to fail.
MKUltra is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StandEmUp
Technical
8
06-24-2016 08:41 AM
b11fedex
Cargo
30
08-21-2012 06:32 PM
KC10 FATboy
Major
29
04-18-2008 07:17 AM
Ray Blaszak
Technical
5
04-17-2008 07:14 PM
Illini
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-06-2006 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices