Search

Notices

AA Class Drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2021, 10:56 AM
  #2791  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: 757/767
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by Dobbs18
I am not arguing. What is there to argue about? Again everyone on here is just b****ing about the situation, I am just telling it like it is...and I have asked if anyone has a better idea that can actually make us(AA) more money then this current JB deal then let's hear it....but all I get is, weak, it should be our flying, those are our routes, yada yada yada...fix scope in this next contract along with a 1000s other things and maybe we will have a case....and we are far from the only carrier to do this, Delta has outsourced their paxs/flying to international JVs for years now and their pilots are ****ed off about it too, at least we didn't give away what little WB flying we have that way. We have an inferior product in the eyes of NYC travelers compared to DL, UAL, and JB. Do you disagree? Yup we did just start DEL yesterday, so I shouldn't list that as a WB international flight then bc it just started? That flight is pretty much sold out for the next 2 weeks everyday, I don't think it's a stretch to assume that some of the connecting paxs were off JB flights. JB has WAY more flights into JFK that can then connect on AA to places like DEL, its not like we can just flip a switch and add all these hub flights into JFK to then fill up a 777 daily to DEL...what should we do? Add a bunch of incoming flights to JFK that lose money for years just to hopefully fill a 777 to international destinations? They are more likely to just buy on UAL or DL, this way we offer JB paxs an opportunity to use their loyalty to connect to far away places that were not accessible for them before on JB and thus giving them a huge incentive to travel that way rather than buy on UAL or DL. AA lost NYC years ago, this isn't something that just happened with the JB deal, I see the JB deal as AA's "last stand" in NYC so to speak. I hope it works, bc the alternative is worse, but I think the gov is going to shut it down anyways...

Good points ☝️👍
AAL24 is offline  
Old 11-17-2021, 09:13 PM
  #2792  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by FlyGuy2021
JetBlue is just a new regional for American to replace Republic in NYC. Period.

Code shares are the new "scope buster".
Here are some pretty telling numbers regarding AAs staffing/JVs plans going forward, and it’s not pretty folks. We are shrinking every narrow body FO bid status effective in March.

NYC. -84
BOS. -16
PHL. -40
DCA. -32
CLT. -13
MIA. -124
DFW. -47
ORD. -2
PHX. -16
LAX. -56
El Peso is offline  
Old 11-17-2021, 09:26 PM
  #2793  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 290
Default

Looks like “Class Drops Only” couldn’t stay on topic. Shocking.
BOGSAT is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 05:25 AM
  #2794  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by BOGSAT
Looks like “Class Drops Only” couldn’t stay on topic. Shocking.
Guilty…”raises hand”
Dobbs18 is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 05:49 AM
  #2795  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
Here are some pretty telling numbers regarding AAs staffing/JVs plans going forward, and it’s not pretty folks. We are shrinking every narrow body FO bid status effective in March.

NYC. -84
BOS. -16
PHL. -40
DCA. -32
CLT. -13
MIA. -124
DFW. -47
ORD. -2
PHX. -16
LAX. -56
theyre cutting 400 fo’s and no captains?
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 06:20 AM
  #2796  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso
Here are some pretty telling numbers regarding AAs staffing/JVs plans going forward, and it’s not pretty folks. We are shrinking every narrow body FO bid status effective in March.

NYC. -84
BOS. -16
PHL. -40
DCA. -32
CLT. -13
MIA. -124
DFW. -47
ORD. -2
PHX. -16
LAX. -56
I just checked CLT from now, DEC, and then looked at MAR 2022 and the 320 is +17 and the 737 shows -11, so that is a net gain of +6 with my public university math...594->611 and 69->58 FOs...not saying you are wrong we could just be looking at different data...source* Expanded 3xp Beta
Dobbs18 is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 07:18 AM
  #2797  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by FlyGuy2021
JetBlue is just a new regional for American to replace Republic in NYC. Period.

Code shares are the new "scope buster".
Just wait until they start codesharing that international flying.... all these folks who think they're gonna be widebody captains in 10-20 years because of "retirements".... the landscape will be interesting in 20-30 years.
HSCompressor is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 08:37 AM
  #2798  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by HSCompressor
Just wait until they start codesharing that international flying.... all these folks who think they're gonna be widebody captains in 10-20 years because of "retirements".... the landscape will be interesting in 20-30 years.
In the LOA that jetblue pilots voted down (company did it anyway as if we voted it in—grievance currently being arbitrated), which B6ALPA not only agreed to but also tried to shove down our throats, 100% of international NEA codeshared flights could be on AA metal (but 65% of Caribbean could be on jetblue as a consolation…sweet…more SDQ redeye turns). Also, jetblue transatlantic flights (I think all, but maybe just London, as they weren’t very clear on that detail) can’t carry AA code per the NEA, but AA can carry B6 code on transatlantic. So it’s a one-sided deal as of right now…and in AA pilots’ favor. I heard that was only to get approval for the NEA, so no idea if that will always be that way.

Who knows how things will shake out (between AA and B6 scope and associated arbitration, DOJ rulings, and future renewals of the NEA), but there is just as much worry on the blue side about this. And as things currently stand, both with the NEA and jetblue mgmt’s intentions (based on the LOA they tried to get us to sign), I don’t think B6 flying AA pax longhaul will happen. I suppose that could change though over the next 20 years. Especially if a bankruptcy shakeup happened or something—but right now I don’t see it. We’re just along for the ride at this point though. Hope it works out well for both of our groups.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 10:29 AM
  #2799  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,448
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
In the LOA that jetblue pilots voted down (company did it anyway as if we voted it in—grievance currently being arbitrated), which B6ALPA not only agreed to but also tried to shove down our throats, 100% of international NEA codeshared flights could be on AA metal (but 65% of Caribbean could be on jetblue as a consolation…sweet…more SDQ redeye turns). Also, jetblue transatlantic flights (I think all, but maybe just London, as they weren’t very clear on that detail) can’t carry AA code per the NEA, but AA can carry B6 code on transatlantic. So it’s a one-sided deal as of right now…and in AA pilots’ favor. I heard that was only to get approval for the NEA, so no idea if that will always be that way.

Who knows how things will shake out (between AA and B6 scope and associated arbitration, DOJ rulings, and future renewals of the NEA), but there is just as much worry on the blue side about this. And as things currently stand, both with the NEA and jetblue mgmt’s intentions (based on the LOA they tried to get us to sign), I don’t think B6 flying AA pax longhaul will happen. I suppose that could change though over the next 20 years. Especially if a bankruptcy shakeup happened or something—but right now I don’t see it. We’re just along for the ride at this point though. Hope it works out well for both of our groups.
If B6 pilots and AA pilots are both thinking it’s a bad deal that means it’s probably a good deal for both managements lol
Saabs is offline  
Old 11-18-2021, 11:10 AM
  #2800  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 589
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
In the LOA that jetblue pilots voted down (company did it anyway as if we voted it in—grievance currently being arbitrated), which B6ALPA not only agreed to but also tried to shove down our throats, 100% of international NEA codeshared flights could be on AA metal (but 65% of Caribbean could be on jetblue as a consolation…sweet…more SDQ redeye turns). Also, jetblue transatlantic flights (I think all, but maybe just London, as they weren’t very clear on that detail) can’t carry AA code per the NEA, but AA can carry B6 code on transatlantic. So it’s a one-sided deal as of right now…and in AA pilots’ favor. I heard that was only to get approval for the NEA, so no idea if that will always be that way.

Who knows how things will shake out (between AA and B6 scope and associated arbitration, DOJ rulings, and future renewals of the NEA), but there is just as much worry on the blue side about this. And as things currently stand, both with the NEA and jetblue mgmt’s intentions (based on the LOA they tried to get us to sign), I don’t think B6 flying AA pax longhaul will happen. I suppose that could change though over the next 20 years. Especially if a bankruptcy shakeup happened or something—but right now I don’t see it. We’re just along for the ride at this point though. Hope it works out well for both of our groups.
you have way more details about the agreement than I did off the top of my head, but this was my point to people on the AA side who were complaining...I get it code shares are not a good thing for pilot jobs, more flying, etc...but in our case(AA) the alternative IMHO is way worse, a complete wind down of NYC hub type flying, along with most international flying...we gave some stuff up, yes, but we got a hub feed for our long haul international flying with a NY area, well-liked provider, without having to expose ourselves to the expenses of operating this type of feed/hub flying which is very expensive and competitive. 20 years down the road??? who knows, answer, no one....look back to 2000 just before 9/11 and who would think then the industry would be what it is today...no one....if you think AA could have done the feed into NYC ourselves you haven't been paying attention to our operation, or don't work here(this is not directed at you BeatNavy), over the next 5-8 years we are going to struggle just to maintain the hub systems we have in place now feeding our international flights at DFW, CLT, MIA, PHL, ORD, and LAX.
Dobbs18 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StandEmUp
Technical
8
06-24-2016 08:41 AM
b11fedex
Cargo
30
08-21-2012 06:32 PM
KC10 FATboy
Major
29
04-18-2008 07:17 AM
Ray Blaszak
Technical
5
04-17-2008 07:14 PM
Illini
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-06-2006 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices