Search

Notices

AA Class Drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2019, 03:48 PM
  #2281  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,316
Default

Originally Posted by RhinoBallAuto
That's exactly what they ARE doing... If they want a roughly 50/50 mix of mil/civ, then after the flow, there's very little room for anything other than mil. It's the only way to get a balanced demo.

Granted, to your point, it leaves little room for 91/135 experienced dudes/dudettes. But as mentioned before, that's entirely their prerogative.

And beyond that, I am personally convinced that the non-flow hiring pattern is intentional -- not because of the demographics factor, but because it helps strengthen their WO rosters. If you really REALLY want to work for AA, and aren't mil, you'd be a fool (or at least disappointed), to not go through the flow. I think it helps them ensure sufficient numbers to keep the WOs staffed. It's cheaper labor, and integral to the business plan. Also ensures a deep bench when the pilot shortage starts to come to fruition. If there's a lack of WO pilots, that really REALLY hurts the bottom line.
I would disagree that 50/50 is a balanced demographic, especially factoring in that the bulk of the civilians are from the Flow. It’s too many military IMO (and I am military). Like to see 1/3 mil, 1/3 civ 121 (from all regionals not just WO) and 1/3 part 91/135.

Your later point is interesting, I think you’re on to something.
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 03:50 PM
  #2282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
Yeah I knew a guy who had been through three indocs in under 365 days. All because the others folded.

The guys coming through now mostly have had it pretty good. For the most part they've never seen a downturn, and think this is normal.
From where? Envoy flows are 2008-2011 hires. They went through a recession and a bankruptcy. They are still flying under a bankruptcy contract at Envoy.
Varsity is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 03:52 PM
  #2283  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
I would disagree that 50/50 is a balanced demographic, especially factoring in that the bulk of the civilians are from the Flow. It’s too many military IMO (and I am military). Like to see 1/3 mil, 1/3 civ 121 (from all regionals not just WO) and 1/3 part 91/135.

Your later point is interesting, I think you’re on to something.
I really don't think AA needs 91/135 pilots. .Mil pilots are hired for their character, 121 pilots for their experience. It's hard to reliably pull either of these virtues out of 135.
Varsity is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 04:17 PM
  #2284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chrisreedrules's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,601
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
I really don't think AA needs 91/135 pilots. .Mil pilots are hired for their character, 121 pilots for their experience. It's hard to reliably pull either of these virtues out of 135.
Most of the guys who flew 135 that I knew are either regional CAs now or are at Frontier or Spirit. And the ones who I came up flying with who went straight to regionals are at JetBlue, Delta, FedEx etc. Should have just sucked it up and went to a regional to begin with.
chrisreedrules is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 04:28 PM
  #2285  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
I really don't think AA needs 91/135 pilots. .Mil pilots are hired for their character, 121 pilots for their experience. It's hard to reliably pull either of these virtues out of 135.


That is a pretty dumb and inaccurate statement.
mainlineAF is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 04:42 PM
  #2286  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,448
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
I really don't think AA needs 91/135 pilots. .Mil pilots are hired for their character, 121 pilots for their experience. It's hard to reliably pull either of these virtues out of 135.
Ummmmm no.

Hope you never have a spot on interview board.
Saabs is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 05:28 PM
  #2287  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF
That is a pretty dumb and inaccurate statement.
If it's inaccurate, most of my career so far has been inaccurate. I still have far more 135 experience than 121. There is a reason that side of the industry is full of lying owners/management, violations, stiffed paychecks, accidents and DUI's.

Netjets/flex and the people in those operations is NOT the norm.

Not to mention there is plenty of open disdain for "Airline pilots" in those circles.
Varsity is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 05:57 PM
  #2288  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Short Bus
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
I really don't think AA needs 91/135 pilots. .Mil pilots are hired for their character, 121 pilots for their experience. It's hard to reliably pull either of these virtues out of 135.
Wow. Generalize much? I spent 7 years flying 135 in various a/c before coming to AA. I could probably fill a page with names of excellent 91/135 pilots that have excellent character with more than enough experience to make it in the airlines. I second the above statement, hope you're not on the interview board anytime soon.
highflyer87 is offline  
Old 10-26-2019, 09:06 PM
  #2289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 200
Default

Anyone have the info on how the drop broke down seniority wise this past week?
black cat is offline  
Old 10-27-2019, 06:28 AM
  #2290  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Covfefe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
I really don't think AA needs 91/135 pilots. .Mil pilots are hired for their character, 121 pilots for their experience. It's hard to reliably pull either of these virtues out of 135.
Lol... I’m a mil guy and even I got a chuckle out of this.... I am just going to go ahead and assume you were posting drunk...
Covfefe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StandEmUp
Technical
8
06-24-2016 08:41 AM
b11fedex
Cargo
30
08-21-2012 06:32 PM
KC10 FATboy
Major
29
04-18-2008 07:17 AM
Ray Blaszak
Technical
5
04-17-2008 07:14 PM
Illini
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-06-2006 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices