Search

Notices

Allegiant Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2015, 10:22 AM
  #971  
Line Holder
 
FBO Bum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Santa's Sleight Driver
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by tyler durden
They are. It takes a call to dispatch and they will add the fuel. If it's above a certain amount, it requires a new dispatch release or amendment. Might cause a delay as the fueler might need to be called back. It's a hassle for sure and sad that it always falls on the pilots to do so many other departments job. As Ops management says, pilots are the last line of defense.

Thanks for the insight. Well, I'm coming from the 135 world. There, you are expected to be the CA, FO, FA, baggage handler, dispatcher, WX man, fueler, etc. and the list goes on, so for me that's not a deal breaker but I definitely see what you mean and why it's a big deal.
Are there any improvements on the pipeline to mitigate the issue (I.e. Training their Distpach center). Thanks!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FBO Bum is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 10:38 AM
  #972  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by FBO Bum
... Are there any improvements on the pipeline to mitigate the issue (I.e. Training their Distpach center)...
unfortunately it will take a catastrophic event followed by a name and ownership change ala valujet before there will ever be a change. it's the philosophy here.
EATME is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 10:51 AM
  #973  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: FO
Posts: 525
Default

Originally Posted by FBO Bum
Thanks for the insight. Well, I'm coming from the 135 world. There, you are expected to be the CA, FO, FA, baggage handler, dispatcher, WX man, fueler, etc. and the list goes on, so for me that's not a deal breaker but I definitely see what you mean and why it's a big deal.
Are there any improvements on the pipeline to mitigate the issue (I.e. Training their Distpach center). Thanks!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The company's operational procedures are designed specifically to put all liability on the pilots, FA's, and mechanics. That's why we have non standard aircraft with radically different cockpit configurations and little differences training, crappy software for scheduling and dispatch (scheduling mistakes, duty time/rest violations), poorly written and vague manuals, substandard bare min MX, terrible payroll software (the company has figured out a way to have pilots do payroll themselves) etc. Everything is designed to give the company the ability avoid as much liability as possible in the event of an accident.

There's a reason the Jetblue, DL, Atlas, American and even Spirit threads don't carry the anger this one does. No airline is perfect, but Allegiant doesn't even try to be.

Good luck in your decision.
HVYMETALDRVR is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 11:10 AM
  #974  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: MD80
Posts: 188
Default

Originally Posted by tyler durden
As did the other 7 captains that have been fired from IWA? Isn't that about 1/3 of the base seniority list for captains? Begs some serious questions. Imagine the equivalent at an SWA base of, say 600 captains: 200 fired. Are we doing THAT bad hiring people? Are they being set up with garbage training? Maintenance? Is support lacking? All the above?

Is the company quick to terminate for what other airlines would avoid with good management or retrain, forgive?

Career questions for anyone looking to come here or stay.

Well, one of the IWA Captains showed up to work drunk.
MD80driver2day is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 11:29 AM
  #975  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 136
Lightbulb Cotter Pin(s) Not

Originally Posted by HVYMETALDRVR
There's a reason the Jetblue, DL, Atlas, American and even Spirit threads don't carry the anger this one does. No airline is perfect, but Allegiant doesn't even try to be.
I'm not angry, just curious. Allegiant management making false statements and overseeing the falsification maintenance records for work not done, done improperly. Seriously when are some these dirt bags going to jail? FAA, POI listen up gents keep looking the other way.

Jetliner's Low-Fuel Landing Draws U.S. FAA Reprimand to Airline - Bloomberg Business
Stok1 is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 12:15 PM
  #976  
Gets Weekends Off
 
grnclvrs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 442
Default

Just got word about some recent "departures." Jesus F'n Christ guys, police yourselves a little bit. No need to make it easy for them.
grnclvrs is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 02:04 PM
  #977  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by tyler durden
They are. It takes a call to dispatch and they will add the fuel. If it's above a certain amount, it requires a new dispatch release or amendment. Might cause a delay as the fueler might need to be called back. It's a hassle for sure and sad that it always falls on the pilots to do so many other departments job. As Ops management says, pilots are the last line of defense.
Been here close to 10 years. I've never had a dispatcher argue with me about adding fuel. It's actually kind of rare that I've ever HAD to add fuel. Lately it seems like dispatch has been adding MORE fuel than needed and has been more on the conservative side (i.e. alternates when not required, etc.).

I've never had MX control tell me NO when I needed MX in an outstation. I have had them try to apply an incorrect MEL a time or two, but I've always been backed up by the fleet mangers or chief pilots.

Bottom line is this place is far from perfect, but all the horror stories out there are not the daily thing. Or maybe I'm just lucky...
j3cub is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 02:29 PM
  #978  
Line Holder
 
FBO Bum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Santa's Sleight Driver
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by j3cub
Been here close to 10 years. I've never had a dispatcher argue with me about adding fuel. It's actually kind of rare that I've ever HAD to add fuel. Lately it seems like dispatch has been adding MORE fuel than needed and has been more on the conservative side (i.e. alternates when not required, etc.).

I've never had MX control tell me NO when I needed MX in an outstation. I have had them try to apply an incorrect MEL a time or two, but I've always been backed up by the fleet mangers or chief pilots.

Bottom line is this place is far from perfect, but all the horror stories out there are not the daily thing. Or maybe I'm just lucky...
Thank you for the different perspective J3cub. I know there is no such thing as a perfect airline and as long as these incidents are the exception and not the rule i'd be happy. Not sure how many of you have been in the 135 world but let me tell you, it's 10 times worst than the worst airline!
FBO Bum is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 03:10 PM
  #979  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by FBO Bum
Thank you for the different perspective J3cub. I know there is no such thing as a perfect airline and as long as these incidents are the exception and not the rule i'd be happy. Not sure how many of you have been in the 135 world but let me tell you, it's 10 times worst than the worst airline!
Thats cool bro, sounds like you’ve really been around the block and back. Maybe when you get here, hopefully you will witness a few Allegiant management types being walked out in cuffs, right past your indoc class. For felonies ranging from falsification of maintenance records and making false statements to federal investigators.

Jetliner's Low-Fuel Landing Draws U.S. FAA Reprimand to Airline - Bloomberg Business
Stok1 is offline  
Old 12-19-2015, 03:47 PM
  #980  
Line Holder
 
FBO Bum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Santa's Sleight Driver
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by Stok1
Thats cool bro, sounds like you’ve really been around the block and back. Maybe when you get here, hopefully you will witness a few Allegiant management types being walked out in cuffs, right past your indoc class. For felonies ranging from falsification of maintenance records and making false statements to federal investigators.

Jetliner's Low-Fuel Landing Draws U.S. FAA Reprimand to Airline - Bloomberg Business
Be that as it may, I still feel that it is a good place to get 121 experience and if problems persist move on. I don't need to "see" that happening for me to believe you, Allegiant is an ultra-low-cost-carrier man and you have to see it for what it is, not for what you would like it to be.

Case and point, I don't want to talk politics but our government has a lot of corrupt people in it and as a consequence the country is in the position that it is now, but you don't see many people emigrating because of this, on the contrary you see thousands of people migrating to the U.S. because in comparison it still is a great place to live.

Same with Allegiant, if what you are claiming is true, believe me when I tell you that they are not the only ones doing it and although I do not condone this kind of behavior it is just part of corporate America. I don't know if you work there or not, but if you do and you are not in agreement with how they are doing things then why stay?

Im not defending Allegiant, but every company has its problems man. They are a relatively young airline and as a result there are some "growing pains" that we all have to be able to accept to work there, and if you are not willing... then move on!!
FBO Bum is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices