Search

Notices

Allegiant Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2015, 04:40 PM
  #911  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 'Bus Driver Right Seat
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by Biggz
What's the specific reason? I'm just curious. I'm trying to get as much info about this company for future prospects.

We're pulling out of the Hawaii market and focusing on moving to a single fleet type with the Airbus.
freightdog is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 05:01 PM
  #912  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by freightdog
We're pulling out of the Hawaii market and focusing on moving to a single fleet type with the Airbus.
Makes sense. Thanks
Biggz is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 05:08 PM
  #913  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,514
Default

Originally Posted by FBO Bum
I see, sounds easy enough I guess. Does the interviewer invites you to a formal interview after that I presume or is it afterwards? Thanks for the info!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's been a while but they just said to expect to hear from HR. So no, not officially that I can remember.
fishforfun is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 05:33 PM
  #914  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Off to the left!
Posts: 464
Default

Originally Posted by Biggz
What's the specific reason? I'm just curious. I'm trying to get as much info about this company for future prospects.
Didn't want to pay for D checks.
eagleatr is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 05:52 PM
  #915  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 927
Default

D checks only part of the story - quite frankly they misread ghe market and the numbers aren't there to justify a 6-airplane fleet & the D checks are the coup de grace for the 757. In retrospect it was probably a mistake to ever attempt Hawaii in the first place.
tailendcharlie is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:25 PM
  #916  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Off to the left!
Posts: 464
Default

Oh there is no doubt they should never have entered the Hawaii market with the way they were running that part of the operation. They managed to screw it up in ways I could never imagine.

Doing ETOPS is the kind of operation that requires putting a lot of time, money, training, maintenance, and the right operations people to operate well. None of those were things they have ever done or wanted to do.
eagleatr is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:51 PM
  #917  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by eagleatr

Doing ETOPS is the kind of operation that requires putting a lot of time, money, training, maintenance, and the right operations people to operate well. None of those were things they have ever done or wanted to do.
You kinda have to maintain planes to do ETOPS. That's rule one!
RadarColor is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 06:58 PM
  #918  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by RadarColor
You kinda have to maintain planes to do ETOPS. That's rule one!
Boom! (No pun intended)
cheers1977 is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 09:28 PM
  #919  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
In retrospect it was probably a mistake to ever attempt Hawaii in the first place.
Ya think?

Originally Posted by eagleatr
They managed to screw it up in ways I could never imagine.

Doing ETOPS is the kind of operation that requires putting a lot of time, money, training, maintenance, and the right operations people to operate well. None of those were things they have ever done or wanted to do.
And there you have it.

Originally Posted by RadarColor
You kinda have to maintain planes to do ETOPS. That's rule one!
Again an anathema for Allegiant. How they got over there in the first place is a mystery. Probably the same POI that allows them to continue flying with an average of one engine fire/failure/rollback a month. Not to mention the flight control rigging problems...

How long before Allegiant replaces Valujet in the pilot's lexicon?
Packrat is offline  
Old 12-15-2015, 10:11 PM
  #920  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by Hovernut
For those of you flying into AVL, please be vigilant in reviewing the TAF and DON'T DEPART if forecast WX is below landing minimums at time of arrival (FAR 121.613). What complicates things for those not in the know is AVL has only 1 approach from the South that MD-80s can accept; this is due to runway construction. Tailwind and circling minima are more restrictive by Company Procedures. Be careful out there...AVL is going to be the new PGD 'till the new runway & approaches are commissioned.
If only there were a certain person who was sitting behind a desk with myriad amounts of information at their fingertips. This person would have intimate knowledge of weather, NOTAMs, aircraft capabilities, and the FAR's. We could even FAA certify them and make them jointly responsible for the flight! This way the flight crew isn't completely alone out there and wouldn't be a gnat's rear end away from a violation every time they show up to work. I wonder what we could call such people.....
CLMP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices