Allegiant Air
#691
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 926
I'd have dumped them, too.
#692
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
"As long as we can take these old, beat up ETOPS jets and undercut the market with cheap labor and questionable mx practices, were in"
"oh, you mean that running an airline means periodic investment in newer equipment or employees..... well, see ya"
#693
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: on the bench
Posts: 157
That was sure as he$# one commitment to the Hawaii market.
"As long as we can take these old, beat up ETOPS jets and undercut the market with cheap labor and questionable mx practices, were in"
"oh, you mean that running an airline means periodic investment in newer equipment or employees..... well, see ya"
"As long as we can take these old, beat up ETOPS jets and undercut the market with cheap labor and questionable mx practices, were in"
"oh, you mean that running an airline means periodic investment in newer equipment or employees..... well, see ya"
#694
I was told that SH was asked directly why they don't invest in newer Airbus that are ETOPS and mainland to Hawaii capable and would allow for one fleet type. The response was we don't buy new, not our MO and the used market is too good at this time. No long term vision whatsoever.
#695
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 947
Too much competition = pressure on fares. Virgin American just started, Southwest probably soon. Too much investment for what amounts to a couple routes.
Frankly I think all this was foreseeable 6 years ago when they started this.
Frankly I think all this was foreseeable 6 years ago when they started this.
#696
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
I was told that SH was asked directly why they don't invest in newer Airbus that are ETOPS and mainland to Hawaii capable and would allow for one fleet type. The response was we don't buy new, not our MO and the used market is too good at this time. No long term vision whatsoever.
#697
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: MD80
Posts: 188
I was told that SH was asked directly why they don't invest in newer Airbus that are ETOPS and mainland to Hawaii capable and would allow for one fleet type. The response was we don't buy new, not our MO and the used market is too good at this time. No long term vision whatsoever.
If you listened to JB, the market no longer makes sense for the company in addition to the heavy checks coming due. Those upset over this should be more familiar with how the company operates.
I would rather work for a company that knows how to allocate resources properly than continue to do the status quo just because. G-d knows this is one of the only things we do right.
Sucks for those that moved to Hawaii, but moving to a new base is always risky.
#698
You realize that ETOPS is non transferable, right? Adding a new or old ETOPS Airbus will require a new ETOPS application. Doesn't matter if they do it today or in 2 years.... It's the same process.
If you listened to JB, the market no longer makes sense for the company in addition to the heavy checks coming due. Those upset over this should be more familiar with how the company operates.
I would rather work for a company that knows how to allocate resources properly than continue to do the status quo just because. G-d knows this is one of the only things we do right.
Sucks for those that moved to Hawaii, but moving to a new base is always risky.
If you listened to JB, the market no longer makes sense for the company in addition to the heavy checks coming due. Those upset over this should be more familiar with how the company operates.
I would rather work for a company that knows how to allocate resources properly than continue to do the status quo just because. G-d knows this is one of the only things we do right.
Sucks for those that moved to Hawaii, but moving to a new base is always risky.
Well said.
#699
You realize that ETOPS is non transferable, right? Adding a new or old ETOPS Airbus will require a new ETOPS application. Doesn't matter if they do it today or in 2 years.... It's the same process.
If you listened to JB, the market no longer makes sense for the company in addition to the heavy checks coming due. Those upset over this should be more familiar with how the company operates.
I would rather work for a company that knows how to allocate resources properly than continue to do the status quo just because. G-d knows this is one of the only things we do right.
Sucks for those that moved to Hawaii, but moving to a new base is always risky.
If you listened to JB, the market no longer makes sense for the company in addition to the heavy checks coming due. Those upset over this should be more familiar with how the company operates.
I would rather work for a company that knows how to allocate resources properly than continue to do the status quo just because. G-d knows this is one of the only things we do right.
Sucks for those that moved to Hawaii, but moving to a new base is always risky.
#700
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Off to the left!
Posts: 465
I think it was inevitable from the time it started that the Hawaii service was not going to last. They never knew what they wanted to do with it, and they didn't make as much money from it as they thought they should.
I also know they really didn't like following the ETOPs maintenance requirements, because they felt it was too expensive.
I know prior to when I left, they were looking at A321's to do the ETOPs flights. I don't know if there are A321's that can do it that aren't either brand new, or pretty close to it.
I also know they really didn't like following the ETOPs maintenance requirements, because they felt it was too expensive.
I know prior to when I left, they were looking at A321's to do the ETOPs flights. I don't know if there are A321's that can do it that aren't either brand new, or pretty close to it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post