Allegiant Air
#2971
Not to politicize this but it's a good time to consider that we may now fall into that category of evil "rich" people that will get taxed as punishment for being "rich"
Consider this when voting in November.
Consider this when voting in November.
#2972
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: AB
Posts: 293
As a spirit pilot,
Does Spirit, Allegiant, Virgin, or JetBlue go to Airbus and clame, because they are an ultra low cost carrier, they should get a substantial discount on leases or purchase prices? What about gate space, contract vendors, contract mx... I don't think Airbus, local airports, or anyone else would agree to subsidize the operation because it is "ulcc" so why should you?
Does Spirit, Allegiant, Virgin, or JetBlue go to Airbus and clame, because they are an ultra low cost carrier, they should get a substantial discount on leases or purchase prices? What about gate space, contract vendors, contract mx... I don't think Airbus, local airports, or anyone else would agree to subsidize the operation because it is "ulcc" so why should you?
Does the GM of a Walmart negotiate lower compensation package than say if he were the GM of a target or a Nordstrom? I would bet he/she actually negotiates more money because the Walmart store is going to have more day to day headaches.
No one except it seems pilots feel the need to subsidize their company's business model through their own compensation. I think the model is good and will certainly help attain company goals but I'm not going to subsidize them.
This attitude of not expecting same or more pay than a legacy pilot is only propagated by us. We can choose to stop that ideology at any time.
No one except it seems pilots feel the need to subsidize their company's business model through their own compensation. I think the model is good and will certainly help attain company goals but I'm not going to subsidize them.
This attitude of not expecting same or more pay than a legacy pilot is only propagated by us. We can choose to stop that ideology at any time.
Good luck to you.
#2973
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Now when they have trouble getting people in the door and/or completing training then they'll have the incentive to pay you more. Until then you're just spitting in the wind.
#2974
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 11
If you simply adhere to market principles, the higher pay should go to the group whose services are scarcer. We all know the legacy airlines have no shortage of applicants whereas Allegiant may be experiencing a shortage of applicants their management deems "qualified" (see below).
So, why is it that Allegiant pays less than the legacies? The short answer is that the legacies have long standing union contracts that distort an individual pilot's value in the market. This is a very good thing! Allegiant has no established union contract. A non-union company is able to exercise more control over the compensation of their employees being unfettered by a contract with its pilots. The more complex answer has to do with the labor supply and the hiring preferences of the better paid airlines.
Beyond numeric flight time, the harsh truth is that the Allegiant management couldn't care less about who they hire. To MG, pilots are just another subset of employees. Actually, he doesn't get involved at all outside of general guidelines handed down to the flight department management: he simply wants to have a group that will clear his insurance requirements and not expose him to legal liability surrounding their level of experience (as ultimately defined by the FAA as sufficient) should there be an accident. He has no preference for military or civilian, etc. All MG wants is somebody who meets a minimum qualification for the job and will accept it at the compensation level he has set for the position. MG is a pure businessman concerned with profits and losses. Personal biases concerning "suitability" for the position (in terms of initial selection) do not play a part in hiring at Allegiant. If anything, Allegiant tends to look for pilot employees that will remain employed through the payback period for their training which is, most likely, a very short time.
So, MG gets pilots for what he can get them for on the open market. He's had a cost advantage for a long time thanks to the ignorance of his generally young and guileless pilot group whose market experience was very limited. By this I mean the Allegiant pilot group took an excessively long time to unionize. Anti-union resistance was very high until recently. Market-experienced members of their group argued in futility for years and against certain anti-union personalities who were given far more heed than they rated. In the end, as we see, those self-serving and malignant personalities were proven wrong and misguided after all.
So, why is it that Allegiant pays less than the legacies? The short answer is that the legacies have long standing union contracts that distort an individual pilot's value in the market. This is a very good thing! Allegiant has no established union contract. A non-union company is able to exercise more control over the compensation of their employees being unfettered by a contract with its pilots. The more complex answer has to do with the labor supply and the hiring preferences of the better paid airlines.
Beyond numeric flight time, the harsh truth is that the Allegiant management couldn't care less about who they hire. To MG, pilots are just another subset of employees. Actually, he doesn't get involved at all outside of general guidelines handed down to the flight department management: he simply wants to have a group that will clear his insurance requirements and not expose him to legal liability surrounding their level of experience (as ultimately defined by the FAA as sufficient) should there be an accident. He has no preference for military or civilian, etc. All MG wants is somebody who meets a minimum qualification for the job and will accept it at the compensation level he has set for the position. MG is a pure businessman concerned with profits and losses. Personal biases concerning "suitability" for the position (in terms of initial selection) do not play a part in hiring at Allegiant. If anything, Allegiant tends to look for pilot employees that will remain employed through the payback period for their training which is, most likely, a very short time.
So, MG gets pilots for what he can get them for on the open market. He's had a cost advantage for a long time thanks to the ignorance of his generally young and guileless pilot group whose market experience was very limited. By this I mean the Allegiant pilot group took an excessively long time to unionize. Anti-union resistance was very high until recently. Market-experienced members of their group argued in futility for years and against certain anti-union personalities who were given far more heed than they rated. In the end, as we see, those self-serving and malignant personalities were proven wrong and misguided after all.
#2976
Banned
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 520
If you simply adhere to market principles, the higher pay should go to the group whose services are scarcer. We all know the legacy airlines have no shortage of applicants whereas Allegiant may be experiencing a shortage of applicants their management deems "qualified" (see below).
So, why is it that Allegiant pays less than the legacies? The short answer is that the legacies have long standing union contracts that distort an individual pilot's value in the market. This is a very good thing! Allegiant has no established union contract. A non-union company is able to exercise more control over the compensation of their employees being unfettered by a contract with its pilots. The more complex answer has to do with the labor supply and the hiring preferences of the better paid airlines.
Beyond numeric flight time, the harsh truth is that the Allegiant management couldn't care less about who they hire. To MG, pilots are just another subset of employees. Actually, he doesn't get involved at all outside of general guidelines handed down to the flight department management: he simply wants to have a group that will clear his insurance requirements and not expose him to legal liability surrounding their level of experience (as ultimately defined by the FAA as sufficient) should there be an accident. He has no preference for military or civilian, etc. All MG wants is somebody who meets a minimum qualification for the job and will accept it at the compensation level he has set for the position. MG is a pure businessman concerned with profits and losses. Personal biases concerning "suitability" for the position (in terms of initial selection) do not play a part in hiring at Allegiant. If anything, Allegiant tends to look for pilot employees that will remain employed through the payback period for their training which is, most likely, a very short time.
So, MG gets pilots for what he can get them for on the open market. He's had a cost advantage for a long time thanks to the ignorance of his generally young and guileless pilot group whose market experience was very limited. By this I mean the Allegiant pilot group took an excessively long time to unionize. Anti-union resistance was very high until recently. Market-experienced members of their group argued in futility for years and against certain anti-union personalities who were given far more heed than they rated. In the end, as we see, those self-serving and malignant personalities were proven wrong and misguided after all.
So, why is it that Allegiant pays less than the legacies? The short answer is that the legacies have long standing union contracts that distort an individual pilot's value in the market. This is a very good thing! Allegiant has no established union contract. A non-union company is able to exercise more control over the compensation of their employees being unfettered by a contract with its pilots. The more complex answer has to do with the labor supply and the hiring preferences of the better paid airlines.
Beyond numeric flight time, the harsh truth is that the Allegiant management couldn't care less about who they hire. To MG, pilots are just another subset of employees. Actually, he doesn't get involved at all outside of general guidelines handed down to the flight department management: he simply wants to have a group that will clear his insurance requirements and not expose him to legal liability surrounding their level of experience (as ultimately defined by the FAA as sufficient) should there be an accident. He has no preference for military or civilian, etc. All MG wants is somebody who meets a minimum qualification for the job and will accept it at the compensation level he has set for the position. MG is a pure businessman concerned with profits and losses. Personal biases concerning "suitability" for the position (in terms of initial selection) do not play a part in hiring at Allegiant. If anything, Allegiant tends to look for pilot employees that will remain employed through the payback period for their training which is, most likely, a very short time.
So, MG gets pilots for what he can get them for on the open market. He's had a cost advantage for a long time thanks to the ignorance of his generally young and guileless pilot group whose market experience was very limited. By this I mean the Allegiant pilot group took an excessively long time to unionize. Anti-union resistance was very high until recently. Market-experienced members of their group argued in futility for years and against certain anti-union personalities who were given far more heed than they rated. In the end, as we see, those self-serving and malignant personalities were proven wrong and misguided after all.
#2977
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 73
#2978
Thanks. Don't plan on commuting that's the whole purpose of making Allegiant a career. I was looking for information on what kinda things they ask about. Btw, you guys actually do, do out and backs correct?
#2979
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 11
"Supply and demand" is too vague. My point was that Allegiant guys should, if anything, be better compensated than the legacies due to scarcity. That's just theory, though.
I'm glad you guys are nearing the end of your negotiations. It's been a long road. Higher pay and benefits will attract more and better candidates. I stand by my statement that the pilot group at Allegiant has/had some seriously stupid and/or self-serving people in positions of influence trying to stop the forward progress of the group. Some had a dim-bulb epiphany and got onboard with the union movement when the BS finally piled up and dirtied them personally. Recognize who these low-value individuals are and make sure they don't get put into a position of influence again.
#2980
Scarcity has nothing to do with it, pilots are a commodity in general. Thus the scarcity of said commodity is not solely limited to one company, but all companies.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post