Search

Notices

Allegiant Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 05:32 AM
  #2971  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N1sync's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: jets
Posts: 220
Default

Not to politicize this but it's a good time to consider that we may now fall into that category of evil "rich" people that will get taxed as punishment for being "rich"

Consider this when voting in November.
N1sync is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 05:38 AM
  #2972  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: AB
Posts: 293
Default

Originally Posted by Excel
As a spirit pilot,

Does Spirit, Allegiant, Virgin, or JetBlue go to Airbus and clame, because they are an ultra low cost carrier, they should get a substantial discount on leases or purchase prices? What about gate space, contract vendors, contract mx... I don't think Airbus, local airports, or anyone else would agree to subsidize the operation because it is "ulcc" so why should you?
You're comparing apples to oranges, but yes, Allegiant negotiates very low rates for most all things they do. Many airports subsidize G4 operations or we don't go into that city.

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Does the GM of a Walmart negotiate lower compensation package than say if he were the GM of a target or a Nordstrom? I would bet he/she actually negotiates more money because the Walmart store is going to have more day to day headaches.

No one except it seems pilots feel the need to subsidize their company's business model through their own compensation. I think the model is good and will certainly help attain company goals but I'm not going to subsidize them.

This attitude of not expecting same or more pay than a legacy pilot is only propagated by us. We can choose to stop that ideology at any time.
Again, you can think you're worth is whatever you want and you wouldn't be wrong. What you are in unrealistic. If you're waiting for legacy rates and work rules, you'll need to get hired at a legacy.

Good luck to you.
JustWatching is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 05:57 AM
  #2973  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by JustWatching
Again, you can think you're worth is whatever you want and you wouldn't be wrong. What you are in unrealistic. If you're waiting for legacy rates and work rules, you'll need to get hired at a legacy.

Good luck to you.
Well said. You knew what Allegiant was when you applied there. What makes you think they're going to change anytime soon? A leopard can't change its spots. As long as there are plenty of pilots who think Allegiant is better than their regional, your management has no incentive to change.

Now when they have trouble getting people in the door and/or completing training then they'll have the incentive to pay you more. Until then you're just spitting in the wind.
Packrat is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 09:58 AM
  #2974  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 11
Default

If you simply adhere to market principles, the higher pay should go to the group whose services are scarcer. We all know the legacy airlines have no shortage of applicants whereas Allegiant may be experiencing a shortage of applicants their management deems "qualified" (see below).

So, why is it that Allegiant pays less than the legacies? The short answer is that the legacies have long standing union contracts that distort an individual pilot's value in the market. This is a very good thing! Allegiant has no established union contract. A non-union company is able to exercise more control over the compensation of their employees being unfettered by a contract with its pilots. The more complex answer has to do with the labor supply and the hiring preferences of the better paid airlines.

Beyond numeric flight time, the harsh truth is that the Allegiant management couldn't care less about who they hire. To MG, pilots are just another subset of employees. Actually, he doesn't get involved at all outside of general guidelines handed down to the flight department management: he simply wants to have a group that will clear his insurance requirements and not expose him to legal liability surrounding their level of experience (as ultimately defined by the FAA as sufficient) should there be an accident. He has no preference for military or civilian, etc. All MG wants is somebody who meets a minimum qualification for the job and will accept it at the compensation level he has set for the position. MG is a pure businessman concerned with profits and losses. Personal biases concerning "suitability" for the position (in terms of initial selection) do not play a part in hiring at Allegiant. If anything, Allegiant tends to look for pilot employees that will remain employed through the payback period for their training which is, most likely, a very short time.

So, MG gets pilots for what he can get them for on the open market. He's had a cost advantage for a long time thanks to the ignorance of his generally young and guileless pilot group whose market experience was very limited. By this I mean the Allegiant pilot group took an excessively long time to unionize. Anti-union resistance was very high until recently. Market-experienced members of their group argued in futility for years and against certain anti-union personalities who were given far more heed than they rated. In the end, as we see, those self-serving and malignant personalities were proven wrong and misguided after all.
Dictum is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 10:53 AM
  #2975  
Line Holder
 
Qwerty320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 43
Default

Does anybody have tips for the phone interview? I have one scheduled soon. I really want to work here.
Qwerty320 is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 10:58 AM
  #2976  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 520
Default

Originally Posted by Dictum
If you simply adhere to market principles, the higher pay should go to the group whose services are scarcer. We all know the legacy airlines have no shortage of applicants whereas Allegiant may be experiencing a shortage of applicants their management deems "qualified" (see below).

So, why is it that Allegiant pays less than the legacies? The short answer is that the legacies have long standing union contracts that distort an individual pilot's value in the market. This is a very good thing! Allegiant has no established union contract. A non-union company is able to exercise more control over the compensation of their employees being unfettered by a contract with its pilots. The more complex answer has to do with the labor supply and the hiring preferences of the better paid airlines.

Beyond numeric flight time, the harsh truth is that the Allegiant management couldn't care less about who they hire. To MG, pilots are just another subset of employees. Actually, he doesn't get involved at all outside of general guidelines handed down to the flight department management: he simply wants to have a group that will clear his insurance requirements and not expose him to legal liability surrounding their level of experience (as ultimately defined by the FAA as sufficient) should there be an accident. He has no preference for military or civilian, etc. All MG wants is somebody who meets a minimum qualification for the job and will accept it at the compensation level he has set for the position. MG is a pure businessman concerned with profits and losses. Personal biases concerning "suitability" for the position (in terms of initial selection) do not play a part in hiring at Allegiant. If anything, Allegiant tends to look for pilot employees that will remain employed through the payback period for their training which is, most likely, a very short time.

So, MG gets pilots for what he can get them for on the open market. He's had a cost advantage for a long time thanks to the ignorance of his generally young and guileless pilot group whose market experience was very limited. By this I mean the Allegiant pilot group took an excessively long time to unionize. Anti-union resistance was very high until recently. Market-experienced members of their group argued in futility for years and against certain anti-union personalities who were given far more heed than they rated. In the end, as we see, those self-serving and malignant personalities were proven wrong and misguided after all.
I know you were trying to come across as smart and all, but the short answer is "supply and demand". Save that long winded puff piece for when you're looking in the mirror, you can even applaud yourself when your done.
crxpilot is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 10:59 AM
  #2977  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Qwerty320
Does anybody have tips for the phone interview? I have one scheduled soon. I really want to work here.
Tell the truth, except if you are planning on commuting.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
trickeriche is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 11:19 AM
  #2978  
Line Holder
 
Qwerty320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by trickeriche
Tell the truth, except if you are planning on commuting.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
Thanks. Don't plan on commuting that's the whole purpose of making Allegiant a career. I was looking for information on what kinda things they ask about. Btw, you guys actually do, do out and backs correct?
Qwerty320 is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 11:21 AM
  #2979  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by crxpilot
I know you were trying to come across as smart and all, but the short answer is "supply and demand". Save that long winded puff piece for when you're looking in the mirror, you can even applaud yourself when your done.
Good one.

"Supply and demand" is too vague. My point was that Allegiant guys should, if anything, be better compensated than the legacies due to scarcity. That's just theory, though.

I'm glad you guys are nearing the end of your negotiations. It's been a long road. Higher pay and benefits will attract more and better candidates. I stand by my statement that the pilot group at Allegiant has/had some seriously stupid and/or self-serving people in positions of influence trying to stop the forward progress of the group. Some had a dim-bulb epiphany and got onboard with the union movement when the BS finally piled up and dirtied them personally. Recognize who these low-value individuals are and make sure they don't get put into a position of influence again.
Dictum is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 11:34 AM
  #2980  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Der Meister's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 320A
Posts: 913
Default

Originally Posted by Dictum
"Supply and demand" is too vague. My point was that Allegiant guys should, if anything, be better compensated than the legacies due to scarcity. That's just theory, though.
Scarcity has nothing to do with it, pilots are a commodity in general. Thus the scarcity of said commodity is not solely limited to one company, but all companies.
Der Meister is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices