Allegiant Air
#2821
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 926
Oh ok. That sounds much better.
Since 4 say EFCA, and 2-3 say no EFCA, suddenly it's a credibility attack?! (Why don't you direct this 'critical' discussion to your training folks?)
I would have thought battle stances would have been drawn over topics that were more pertinent to the real issues facing the pilots. Oh, I don't know, maybe contract, safety...
Nope. Arguing over EFCA. What makes it even more amusing is that you apparently almost suffered a major mishap because of garbage maintenance...and pilots are 'swordfighting' over proper terminology. Wow. For a minute I thought I was on one of the regional boards.
MG must be pleased.
Since 4 say EFCA, and 2-3 say no EFCA, suddenly it's a credibility attack?! (Why don't you direct this 'critical' discussion to your training folks?)
I would have thought battle stances would have been drawn over topics that were more pertinent to the real issues facing the pilots. Oh, I don't know, maybe contract, safety...
Nope. Arguing over EFCA. What makes it even more amusing is that you apparently almost suffered a major mishap because of garbage maintenance...and pilots are 'swordfighting' over proper terminology. Wow. For a minute I thought I was on one of the regional boards.
MG must be pleased.
Now, the tone may have been a little juvenile (per what seems to have become internet SOP), but what's the harm in learning from each other?
#2822
On Reserve
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 15
Oh ok. That sounds much better.
Since 4 say EFCA, and 2-3 say no EFCA, suddenly it's a credibility attack?! (Why don't you direct this 'critical' discussion to your training folks?)
I would have thought battle stances would have been drawn over topics that were more pertinent to the real issues facing the pilots. Oh, I don't know, maybe contract, safety...
Nope. Arguing over EFCA. What makes it even more amusing is that you apparently almost suffered a major mishap because of garbage maintenance...and pilots are 'swordfighting' over proper terminology. Wow. For a minute I thought I was on one of the regional boards.
MG must be pleased.
Since 4 say EFCA, and 2-3 say no EFCA, suddenly it's a credibility attack?! (Why don't you direct this 'critical' discussion to your training folks?)
I would have thought battle stances would have been drawn over topics that were more pertinent to the real issues facing the pilots. Oh, I don't know, maybe contract, safety...
Nope. Arguing over EFCA. What makes it even more amusing is that you apparently almost suffered a major mishap because of garbage maintenance...and pilots are 'swordfighting' over proper terminology. Wow. For a minute I thought I was on one of the regional boards.
MG must be pleased.
I wouldn't give a s#%t about what he does in his cockpit except that when he is put in a position to explain it (it being ANYTHING outside approved guidance) it hurt's the CREDIBILITY of the entire pilot group and weaken's our argument. Like it or not that is the reality of the situation.
I guess having left and "risen above the fray" you now feel entitled to be condescending and arrogant. Wow! That is unfortunate.
#2823
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Thanks for making my point. In your response you've demanded accountability from the training department, maintenance, and there are some two hundred odd pages in this thread demanding accountability from management. Yet, we have a pilot trying to justify on a public board that he does things a little different because that's what he did on another fleet or what someone else does, nevermind it's not in-line with approved guidance. It's not about terminology, it's representative of a mindset that is unacceptable, IMO, if we are going to demand accountability and be taken seriously as a pilot group.
I wouldn't give a s#%t about what he does in his cockpit except that when he is put in a position to explain it (it being ANYTHING outside approved guidance) it hurt's the CREDIBILITY of the entire pilot group and weaken's our argument. Like it or not that is the reality of the situation.
I guess having left and "risen above the fray" you now feel entitled to be condescending and arrogant. Wow! That is unfortunate.
I wouldn't give a s#%t about what he does in his cockpit except that when he is put in a position to explain it (it being ANYTHING outside approved guidance) it hurt's the CREDIBILITY of the entire pilot group and weaken's our argument. Like it or not that is the reality of the situation.
I guess having left and "risen above the fray" you now feel entitled to be condescending and arrogant. Wow! That is unfortunate.
-signed-
G4 management (not really)
Ps. Take a sedative before you blow a major vessel.
#2824
#2825
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: on the bench
Posts: 157
But hey, you can fly 1200 miles for only $49 and often get there on the scheduled day.
#2826
Swimmin' in da pool
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 444
Thanks for making my point. In your response you've demanded accountability from the training department, maintenance, and there are some two hundred odd pages in this thread demanding accountability from management. Yet, we have a pilot trying to justify on a public board that he does things a little different because that's what he did on another fleet or what someone else does, nevermind it's not in-line with approved guidance. It's not about terminology, it's representative of a mindset that is unacceptable, IMO, if we are going to demand accountability and be taken seriously as a pilot group.
I wouldn't give a s#%t about what he does in his cockpit except that when he is put in a position to explain it (it being ANYTHING outside approved guidance) it hurt's the CREDIBILITY of the entire pilot group and weaken's our argument. Like it or not that is the reality of the situation.
I guess having left and "risen above the fray" you now feel entitled to be condescending and arrogant. Wow! That is unfortunate.
I wouldn't give a s#%t about what he does in his cockpit except that when he is put in a position to explain it (it being ANYTHING outside approved guidance) it hurt's the CREDIBILITY of the entire pilot group and weaken's our argument. Like it or not that is the reality of the situation.
I guess having left and "risen above the fray" you now feel entitled to be condescending and arrogant. Wow! That is unfortunate.
We all thought it had the potential of being the best gig in the business. The sense of loss because things went south is why so much emotion is felt on this thread.
That was my only point, to not lose sight of the prize and allow the actions of management to derail what appears to be solid progress.
Best wishes.
#2830
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: on the bench
Posts: 157
This business model would work wonderfully if the flights were reliable. No one wants to plan a trip and then have to deal with the hassles and grief when they can't get to their destination. On the planned arrival day travelers usually have show tickets they have bought, hotel rooms, rental cars, plans with friends or family such as a wedding or funeral or reunion, etc. They may have planned a brief 2 or 3 day getaway, so missing the first day of the trip cuts it in half. Or a delay getting back home results in a missed day at work, causing big problems for some. Then if they desperately book with another airline they pay dearly for the last-minute walk-up fare. This is the final straw for the cost-conscience customer AAY appealed to in the first place. There's a reason AAY sometimes drops service to a particular area, after a while the number of people buying tickets drops to a level that doesn't make it worthwhile. A reputation for being unreliable is part of that.
A business flyer that misses a meeting is one thing, he doesn't cry over that, especially if he isn't personally paying for the trip. But wreck someone's personal travel plans and they won't be happy. The general feeling from many I've heard from is that AAY has to continually expand service to new cities to draw new customers, to replace all the former customers that will never fly with them again after a debacle. It's that old PT Barnum circus thing, bilk all the customers you can, then move on to a different town for fresh ones.
Last edited by rokgpsman; 06-11-2016 at 07:22 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post