Allegiant Air
#2661
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Ooooh that smacks of entitlement mentality right there, this is getting good. *****************
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 05-13-2016 at 02:19 PM. Reason: TOU
#2662
#2664
2. No
3. Only if they've made their schedules public, otherwise, No. Most guys have made their schedules visible. Even then, you don't know how many hours they have, so you have no way of knowing who's up next in call order. I always ask the crew schedulers to verify my hours against those also on RSV. Or I text the other guys and ask them, if i know them.
#2668
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Da Bus
Posts: 481
I'd settle only for all 3 of those things being industry standard (legacy standard) or better. Why settle for less? I'd rather burn this place to the ground via striking, than settle for C scale compensation and work rules.
#2669
If the union's scheduling committee takes full control of the CBI then it negates a lot of the work rule discussion and will get us a lot of what we want since we won't be bound by the company's algorithm and the 100% working day B.S.
We need to be letting our reps know that these are things we want and stop discussing what we'd settle for.
#2670
Lifer
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: MD80 CA
Posts: 176
I was starting to like the new crew bidding (CBI) which includes a standing bid. After getting my June schedule I'm 100% on board with line bidding! I'll spare you the details, but I got two scoops of crap that completely ignored seniority (12 yrs). I'm not the only one with these issues either, unfortunately.
Back to line bidding: has my vote.
Back to line bidding: has my vote.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post