Allegiant Air
03-24-2015, 04:31 PM
#2211
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 927
I was thinking more along the lines of FA's gate agents & mechanics who will start asking you why you want to cost them their jobs......HQ folks are already a lost cause....
03-24-2015, 04:49 PM
#2212
Banned
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 520
The real test will be what constitutes an ongoing "major" dispute. If you look at the bullet points from the email about the new CBI, it looks like they are trying to appear as if they are meeting the judges action. I don't have the injunction in front of me but it looks like what he wrote as far as making improvements.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
03-24-2015, 05:01 PM
#2213
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: 80 to 320
Posts: 66
The real test will be what constitutes an ongoing "major" dispute. If you look at the bullet points from the email about the new CBI, it looks like they are trying to appear as if they are meeting the judges action. I don't have the injunction in front of me but it looks like what he wrote as far as making improvements.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
03-24-2015, 05:16 PM
#2214
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
The real test will be what constitutes an ongoing "major" dispute. If you look at the bullet points from the email about the new CBI, it looks like they are trying to appear as if they are meeting the judges action. I don't have the injunction in front of me but it looks like what he wrote as far as making improvements.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
03-24-2015, 05:21 PM
#2215
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 279
SH made it sound like the NMB rejected our Proffer; they didn't! The Gov't just wants one last "cain't we all just get along?" bash before the release. Nice display of ignorance of the RLA AND the Court Injunction on the Company's behalf in regards to the possibility of a Status Quo Strike! Just think of the mess of $$ F&H is sucking out of our profits...pretty sad..
Exactly. Proffer was NOT rejected. Yes, they want both parties to meet in D.C., but it was not specifically to resume negotiations.
Typical union bashing noise. Don't buy it guys!
That email makes me want to strike even more.
03-24-2015, 05:32 PM
#2216
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
The real test will be what constitutes an ongoing "major" dispute. If you look at the bullet points from the email about the new CBI, it looks like they are trying to appear as if they are meeting the judges action. I don't have the injunction in front of me but it looks like what he wrote as far as making improvements.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
Don't misunderstand me, I don't buy it. But I think that's the angle they are going for here:
To provide the ability for crew members to submit a monthly standing bid.
To display the bid packet information in one place to assist with the building of monthly preferences.
To significantly reduce the time required for crew members to submit preferences.
To facilitate improved bidding on mobile devices: The CBI has been designed to work on most tabular and cellular devices, as well as standard desktops.
To mitigate the notion of the “apathetic bidder”: All crew members will be bidding on all preferences based on their selections.
To provide automated feedback to crew members regarding their final schedule awards.
03-24-2015, 06:16 PM
#2217
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 927
You can view 40min. of video on the 9th circuit court of appeals website that shows both sides arguing the case before the panel on Feb. 2. Worth watching. IMO maybe not quite the slam-dunk the Teamsters are portraying it as but of course would you expect otherwise?
03-24-2015, 06:25 PM
#2218
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Has the 9th circuit ruled yet? I think that’s a no. So far Vegas superior is last ruling on record. The slam-dunk was Vegas superior declaration of ‘major dispute’. Until 9th circuit or Vegas superior rules different.
I did view the entire video. I especially like the judges question, “then what was it?”
You can view 40min. of video on the 9th circuit court of appeals website that shows both sides arguing the case before the panel on Feb. 2. Worth watching. IMO maybe not quite the slam-dunk the Teamsters are portraying it as but of course would you expect otherwise?
03-24-2015, 10:03 PM
#2219
New Hire
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 7
Maybe it would be best to let the 9th district rule before striking. If the judge orders us back to work right away we would look like fools. We should not make decisions based on emotions. If the 9th district upholds it.... Absolutely. I'm just seeing a lot of gray. IMO
03-24-2015, 10:09 PM
#2220
New Hire
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 7
I voted to strike BTW but the union was saying SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE WILL STRIKE that is the best way to avoid a strike.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
