Search

Notices

Contract negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2022, 10:35 AM
  #921  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 69
Default

Originally Posted by 9easy
Delta CEO on CNBC today saying profits will be up 100% next year, their only limiting factor being pilots over the next 5 years. If Delta is worried about pilots limiting profits, maybe Maury should be a tad worried too? Is the Allegiant BOD just on autopilot and willing to make losses while everyone else makes profits? The ability for Allegiant to grow and prosper has a direct correlation to how good the next contract is, period.
I think you meant to say that the ability for Allegiant to survive has a direct correlation to how good the next contract is. How many people on our seniority list got hired during the lost decade and are only at Allegiant because it was the best they could do at the time.. They have a choice now and this contract could make actually pursuing their career goals an easy decision. Especially when the seniority they have now could be matched fairly quickly with the opportunities that are happening right now. The times we are in now is basically a second chance at an incredible career. Ex. Around 20 years from now you could be in the top 20-30% at United. Less than 10 years < 50%.
V2cut is offline  
Old 12-14-2022, 12:28 PM
  #922  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,170
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
is that really true? why does AR say that cannot happen with our bylaws?
Actually, it was true until last year (The hated 2/3 rule), but O’Brien-Zuckerman (who Andrew and the boys campaigned against vocally) got it removed. So no, they can't actually do that any more.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 12-14-2022, 04:29 PM
  #923  
Voice of Reason
 
akulahunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Uncomfortable
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Actually, it was true until last year (The hated 2/3 rule), but O’Brien-Zuckerman (who Andrew and the boys campaigned against vocally) got it removed. So no, they can't actually do that any more.
Do you have a reference for that? I haven't heard any of our union guys actually say that. It would be great if that's true.
akulahunter is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 05:46 AM
  #924  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,170
Default

Originally Posted by akulahunter
Do you have a reference for that? I haven't heard any of our union guys actually say that. It would be great if that's true.
https://www.tdu.org/two_thirds_rule_is_over

How could AR not know that? I guess he really does live in a bubble. Not a good look.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 07:32 AM
  #925  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
https://www.tdu.org/two_thirds_rule_is_over

How could AR not know that? I guess he really does live in a bubble. Not a good look.
Not really relevant to us, the 2/3 rule could only be used if less than half of membership participated in voting. Seeing as our last strike vote had 90%+ participation we were never at risk of having the 2/3 rule exercised on us
310skying is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 08:26 AM
  #926  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,170
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
Not really relevant to us, the 2/3 rule could only be used if less than half of membership participated in voting. Seeing as our last strike vote had 90%+ participation we were never at risk of having the 2/3 rule exercised on us
Hard to believe less than half the UPS drivers didn't vote too. They're pretty hardcore. But nevertheless...
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 11:40 AM
  #927  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Position: Airbus Captain
Posts: 69
Question

Where's the BAFO! Isn't this about the time we should be expecting MG to slide over the company's best & final offer (Alaska +)? That is my plan A. My plan B is a merger with ___________. (fill in the blank(s). My plan C kicks in start of 2023...better get those apps up to date : /
SloNLow is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 04:49 PM
  #928  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N1sync's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: jets
Posts: 220
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
Not really relevant to us, the 2/3 rule could only be used if less than half of membership participated in voting. Seeing as our last strike vote had 90%+ participation we were never at risk of having the 2/3 rule exercised on us
sure but only about 25% voted for EXCO…


says a lot
N1sync is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 05:06 PM
  #929  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 69
Default

Originally Posted by SloNLow
Where's the BAFO! Isn't this about the time we should be expecting MG to slide over the company's best & final offer (Alaska +)? That is my plan A. My plan B is a merger with ___________. (fill in the blank(s). My plan C kicks in start of 2023...better get those apps up to date : /
Consider the time it takes from the start of the hiring process until a class date. The last I’ve heard from friends.
Delta ~ 6 months
United / American ~ 3 months
Southwest ~ 3 months
Not sure about JetBlue

Each month could be up to 400 seniority numbers lost forever.

From application submission until interview invite < 2 weeks. Especially ones that had been reviewed professionally etc.
V2cut is offline  
Old 12-15-2022, 06:06 PM
  #930  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2022
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by akulahunter
Rumor on the street is that the company didn't show up one of the days and didn't have anything for the union on the second day.



Just curious about what you think ALPA would do differently. If the company says we are worth JB's four-year-old contract with essentially current work rules, what is ALPA going to do? No union can make the company agree to a deal. That's not how it works. Also, ALPA bought off on Spirit's crappy deal and United's/Alaska's as well. No thanks to any of those.




I have never called you any name. I thought we were having a logical back-and-forth discourse about an issue that neither of us is an expert on. Maybe I was wrong.
Well it's been touched on a few times since you said this, but I'll throw in my 2 cents. We all got that holiday teamster's magazine. Anybody see any mention of airlines? Nope, just some clowns at amazon, baristas and UPS drivers. IBT is not the union you want representing you in our industry. All that chest bumping sh*t may work with these $15 an hour blue collar workers, but it doesn't work here. ALPA has numerous flaws, but at least their war chest can pay for people that have the knowledge to at least know the difference between Boeing and Airbus.
Originally Posted by captnate702
See below for why i responded the way i did. I wasn't the one that started talking about unstacking and PBS. I was asking questions about AR's video. I only brought it up here and else where after AR went on about it in his video.



My original concern was that unstacking/stacking was going to be the last thing left and it was going to turn into a d*ck measuring contest between AR and MG and we the pilots would lose. I hope i am wrong. that would be terrible for the pilot group. But AR's video and what i'm hearing is that unstack is still hard impasse. If that is true then then we will be the losers. We will never be released if we demand something nobody in the industry has and alternatively if AR digs in his heels then we'll be stuck watching videos til 2026 at least.

Even the union has said that the company keeps upping their retirement/rates each time they send section 3 and 4. Per union whispers, MG is offering DC for retirement (15%), the rates started with Suncountry plus, but are now closer to Alaska with a ULCC discount. That is not going to get it done, but that's a lot of movement from MG in less than 6 months because the market is going to determine the rates. No ULCC discount. Per union whispers MG has stopped telling the union that allegiant gets a discount because we are a ULCC. my crystal ball (and some of this optimistic thinking) is that at some point MG will be forced to pay us, the market is gonna force him to and MG is gonna realize that is the only way this thing gets voted in.

The work rules will have to be standardized with the industry. no more moving raps all over the place and jerking reserves down in FL. even though a lot of reserves have a good gig, the reserves in FL get screwed way way way too often and that has to be fixed. we also need the ability for a pilot to sit long call, so stupid that scheduling doesn't use that today. we should demand that at least some reserves are long call, that could make life a whole lot better for reserves in FL and other big bases (IWA/LAS).

A lot of the other work rules for line holders aren't that different from other carriers on paper. crew services just ignores the work rules that we have, but those work rules are industry standard (extensions, reassignments, open time, trip trades, etc. are all pretty standard crew services just ignores them - not sure we need "better" work rules we just need a lot of our current work rules to be followed).

Just my two cents...
I'm truly worried that we've got two ego maniacs negotiating against each-other, not for their respective groups. AR is more focused on looking pretty in his infomercials (which lack any significant information) than he is getting us a solid contract. "A" for effort, "F" for execution. MG is MG, there needs to be zero explanation there. I really really hope our assessment isn't just buying steak dinners for the d*ck measuring contest between those two, but every passing day I lose a little more faith.

Originally Posted by captnate702
I'm not sure if that is good or bad? it looks like the blind leading blind. I have no idea who's done what on management side except for googling linkedin profiles.

who on our team have been in negotiations before? isn't it just Hegland - and he's the one that negotiated our current contract so that's not very comforting. AR, Kenny, Valenzuela, Jay and Josh haven't - i don't believe - ever been in negotiations before. Maybe i'm wrong. i know our culinary attorney has negotiated contracts just nothing RLA related.

We've got the freshman starting on the varsity squad because nobody else showed up to play. Our exco is so in over their heads it isn't even funny. I HOPE they read this and prove me wrong, I'll be the first to buy them a beer. At the end of the day, if my doctor, tax-preparer, portfolio manager do a sh*t job, I light a fire or fire them. It should be no different than with our ELECTED exco. Our culinary attorney is another prime example of why IBT is trash, do we really think any ALPA group is being represented at the table by anybody who doesn't talk aviation contract in their sleep?

https://www.atlasairworldwide.com/20...bor-relations/

DM was a consultant for F&H and then left to be SVP at Atlas. no idea if he quit first and then went to Atlas or what. maybe you know what he was thinking when he left allegiant high and dry.



This is something we can 100% agree on.
Add me to this one, 100% agree.
Greyhound89 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
tallplt
Major
28
06-17-2012 10:23 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ITSALLGOOD
Major
1
07-07-2007 08:34 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices