Search

Notices

Contract negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2022, 05:18 PM
  #271  
Kabuki Kool
 
FreshWater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: fu3king.airline@Furlough. DNA
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
even the forcast recession ( which should not affect G4 demand)
I agree with the recession not having much of an effect on G4. It’s not like we fly families on their way to Hawaii or Europe. We mostly fly conus trailer park destinations, or dirt bag Mexican air to mêhicõ. They’ll be plenty of unemployment money to go around.

Last edited by FreshWater; 05-17-2022 at 06:02 PM.
FreshWater is offline  
Old 05-17-2022, 05:35 PM
  #272  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
it’s funny you think I’m on the kool aid, I know both sides are running straight political campaigns. All they are doing is saying what they can that appeases who they are talking to. Some things are regulated such as earnings calls, 10ks, and 8ks. I don’t take what AR or the company say as fact, but I still listen, keep a close eye on the industry, and the economy. All of these factors: pilot shortage, upcoming plane payments, even the forcast recession ( which should not affect G4 demand), the cost of pilot turn over, lack of immediate regulatory relief, and the schedule they are already selling for the holiday season point to one thing: NEW CONTRACT. The question isn’t if, it’s when, and what will it look like?
You still don't get it. Buckle up and grab a Snickers. You're in for a looonngg ride.
Jim Rockford is offline  
Old 05-17-2022, 05:37 PM
  #273  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Rockford
You still don't get it. Buckle up and grab a Snickers. You're in for a looonngg ride.
I’ll wager a snickers, contract AIP by NOV 22. (If it passes or not is another question)
310skying is offline  
Old 05-17-2022, 06:42 PM
  #274  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 713
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Rockford
That re-write will make great toilet paper for Allegiant HQ.
Why would anybody want a re-write over a sack of cash?? You think if we re-write the contract management and ms foster will suddenly stop doing the same old $h*+??

The one thing management can’t break in the contract is paying me high rates. That number doesn’t lie…words can be manipulated, pay rates cannot.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 05-17-2022, 07:33 PM
  #275  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
why would anybody want a re-write over a sack of cash?? You think if we re-write the contract management and ms foster will suddenly stop doing the same old $h*+??

The one thing management can’t break in the contract is paying me high rates. That number doesn’t lie…words can be manipulated, pay rates cannot.
☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼 ☝🏼
Jim Rockford is offline  
Old 05-18-2022, 04:54 AM
  #276  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,014
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
Why would anybody want a re-write over a sack of cash?? You think if we re-write the contract management and ms foster will suddenly stop doing the same old $h*+??

The one thing management can’t break in the contract is paying me high rates. That number doesn’t lie…words can be manipulated, pay rates cannot.
According to AR video April 16th, the hurdle they are working on is what happens if the contract is violated. To paraphrase, they are aware that without these protections, the rest of the contract could be meaningless. The first 1 minute and 20 seconds describes the issue perfectly.

According to AR video May 7th, things are looking up. I don't have any reason to doubt him right now so cautiously optimistic. Some bold statements were made to that effect, not that it can't change for the worse but I assume he believes what he says.

Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but I do not see anything that says simple normal progress is not being made. I am happy for the time being to let this team do its work and withhold judgement for a later date. I hope my feelings are not misplaced but time will tell.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 05-18-2022, 06:52 AM
  #277  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
According to AR video April 16th, the hurdle they are working on is what happens if the contract is violated. To paraphrase, they are aware that without these protections, the rest of the contract could be meaningless. The first 1 minute and 20 seconds describes the issue perfectly.

According to AR video May 7th, things are looking up. I don't have any reason to doubt him right now so cautiously optimistic. Some bold statements were made to that effect, not that it can't change for the worse but I assume he believes what he says.

Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but I do not see anything that says simple normal progress is not being made. I am happy for the time being to let this team do its work and withhold judgement for a later date. I hope my feelings are not misplaced but time will tell.
Reasonably stated, and a great analysis of the current situation. Nice to see some reason around here
310skying is offline  
Old 05-18-2022, 08:05 AM
  #278  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,014
Default

Originally Posted by 310skying
Reasonably stated, and a great analysis of the current situation. Nice to see some reason around here
This pilot group has put up with a lot of abuse from this company, I can see why many are jaded as there is a lack of trust here that can only be fixed with a culture change that starts at the very top. Maybe things will change under the new leadership on June 1st. This pilot group simply wants industry standard, there is no argument to do anything less. But I think we should take AR at his word it will probably not be very quick as no contract has ever been signed without the assistance of NMB which puts us fairly far down the road. If NMB is not involved that would be a first.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 05-18-2022, 08:50 AM
  #279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 713
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
According to AR video April 16th, the hurdle they are working on is what happens if the contract is violated. To paraphrase, they are aware that without these protections, the rest of the contract could be meaningless. The first 1 minute and 20 seconds describes the issue perfectly.

According to AR video May 7th, things are looking up. I don't have any reason to doubt him right now so cautiously optimistic. Some bold statements were made to that effect, not that it can't change for the worse but I assume he believes what he says.

Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but I do not see anything that says simple normal progress is not being made. I am happy for the time being to let this team do its work and withhold judgement for a later date. I hope my feelings are not misplaced but time will tell.
I get that he wants certainty for what happens when the contract is violated. But the certainty is arbitration. There is no other mechanism to enforce the contract with the RLA hanging over our heads.

The problem is we keep getting told that arbitration wins are coming but then we keep losing the “industry standard” arbitrations. Union was super confident about VFNs, rental cars, SAP going abg, Merlot, etc. and we’ve lost all of them. If we lose the RAPs one then that is a long losing streak.

The strategy worked for a while but something happened and now all do we lose. I don’t want the hope of winning arbitrations to enforce the next contract. This just seems like stuff to make the exco and AR’s job easier. He’s not some selfless leader that is just trying to serve others (see his PGD line every month), he’s a politician making sure he gets his and imo all this noise about sections 18 and 19 are more for his benefit than mine.

Just pay me more money. Make vfns 300%, increase my guarantee, increase my rates, top notch retirement DC, etc. all those numbers cannot be argued or manipulated. Those numbers I know I will get because numbers do not lie.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 05-18-2022, 09:33 AM
  #280  
Kabuki Kool
 
FreshWater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: fu3king.airline@Furlough. DNA
Posts: 447
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
Just pay me more money. Make vfns 300%, increase my guarantee, increase my rates, top notch retirement DC, etc. all those numbers cannot be argued or manipulated. Those numbers I know I will get because numbers do not lie.
The survey contradicts a pay rate only contract. The majority of us resoundingly want an industry leading contract. That includes robust language from beginning to end. AR is complying with this data from the pilot group. Means we won’t get one in the near future. Maybe lobby for another survey? Maybe the pilot group as a majority will say screw reserve rules, the hell with industry min days off, industry scheduling practices, industry reserve call out, etc...

Unless and until that happens, AR is complying with the wishes of the pilot group via the survey. Begrudging the wealth of AR is fodder for contesting his elected position. It’s an elected position. Don’t vote for him when his tenure is up.
FreshWater is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
tallplt
Major
28
06-17-2012 10:23 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ITSALLGOOD
Major
1
07-07-2007 08:34 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices