Search

Notices

Hiring Pool Delays?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2021, 06:15 AM
  #61  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,215
Default

Originally Posted by avident22
I am running out of sarcasm reading ability hahahah is this a good thing or a bad thing? What you are suggesting....
He's suggesting that the next base will be Austin Texas. And in a page out of the regional airline management playbook, he's suggesting you should stick around because "good things are happening, you'll be sorry if you leave". He's also been wrong about every prediction he's made in his 12 posts here. There has been a rumor of an AUS base as long as anyone can remember. Lots of people would want it, and it could immediately become the most senior base, which is probably why they would never do it. High seniority means high individual base costs on paper, which the bean counters who are running this place hate. Look for new bases to be in places few people want to live. That's the ongoing pattern. The few top spots go senior, and the rest super junior. Established bases continue to lose flying to the new base. Zero sum game. I'd say top contenders are BLV, LCK, MEM, RFD, ATW, FNT.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 03-04-2021, 11:40 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: A-320
Posts: 680
Default

I'm always spot on at predicting the next new base incorrectly but I would bet money it won't be AUS. Maybe next year or the year after since they are saying 3 new bases a year for the foreseeable future. My guess is the third one down on that list in the post directly above.
KC135 is offline  
Old 03-04-2021, 01:16 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 713
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
He's suggesting that the next base will be Austin Texas. And in a page out of the regional airline management playbook, he's suggesting you should stick around because "good things are happening, you'll be sorry if you leave". He's also been wrong about every prediction he's made in his 12 posts here. There has been a rumor of an AUS base as long as anyone can remember. Lots of people would want it, and it could immediately become the most senior base, which is probably why they would never do it. High seniority means high individual base costs on paper, which the bean counters who are running this place hate. Look for new bases to be in places few people want to live. That's the ongoing pattern. The few top spots go senior, and the rest super junior. Established bases continue to lose flying to the new base. Zero sum game. I'd say top contenders are BLV, LCK, MEM, RFD, ATW, FNT.
I don't know if AUS will be the next base, but I think it is on the short list now more than before. Frontier has pulled back quite a bit from AUS and so that south terminal should be more available. I would say BNA is high, but it is congested and will be more difficult to find gates. Management is going to have to expand into bigger markets for their bases. The aggressive growth will be about connecting city pairs as opposed to traditional leisure markets. We added Key West, but how many more traditional domestic markets are out there that don't have competing service?

I think the new bases will be larger airports/markets like AUS, BNA, BLV, MEM and LCK as opposed to ATW, RFD and FNT. But all of this is just me reading tea leaves so its probably all wrong.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 03-04-2021, 02:26 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
I don't know if AUS will be the next base, but I think it is on the short list now more than before. Frontier has pulled back quite a bit from AUS and so that south terminal should be more available. I would say BNA is high, but it is congested and will be more difficult to find gates. Management is going to have to expand into bigger markets for their bases. The aggressive growth will be about connecting city pairs as opposed to traditional leisure markets. We added Key West, but how many more traditional domestic markets are out there that don't have competing service?

I think the new bases will be larger airports/markets like AUS, BNA, BLV, MEM and LCK as opposed to ATW, RFD and FNT. But all of this is just me reading tea leaves so its probably all wrong.
BNA is already a base.
Jim Rockford is offline  
Old 03-04-2021, 02:58 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 243
Default

Have you guys brought back any of the new hire classes that were sent home?
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 03-04-2021, 03:56 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: SnackBsktRaider
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn
Have you guys brought back any of the new hire classes that were sent home?
They aren’t scheduled to be back until mid-late May
DiamondDriver is offline  
Old 03-05-2021, 02:04 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SladeTin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
I would say BNA is high, but it is congested and will be more difficult to find gates.
Considering BNA is already a base, then yes I’d say the chances are high!!
SladeTin is offline  
Old 03-05-2021, 10:25 AM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
He's suggesting that the next base will be Austin Texas. And in a page out of the regional airline management playbook, he's suggesting you should stick around because "good things are happening, you'll be sorry if you leave". He's also been wrong about every prediction he's made in his 12 posts here. There has been a rumor of an AUS base as long as anyone can remember. Lots of people would want it, and it could immediately become the most senior base, which is probably why they would never do it. High seniority means high individual base costs on paper, which the bean counters who are running this place hate. Look for new bases to be in places few people want to live. That's the ongoing pattern. The few top spots go senior, and the rest super junior. Established bases continue to lose flying to the new base. Zero sum game. I'd say top contenders are BLV, LCK, MEM, RFD, ATW, FNT.

Ask anyone who was at the IWA base meeting and they’ll tell you a certain SVP let it slip... it’s a known commodity. I never said what it was but you can find out if you put in the work.
Flightaware is offline  
Old 03-05-2021, 10:59 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: A-320
Posts: 680
Default

This is subjective but the only other highly desirable place to live that currently meets the min number of routes for a base besides AUS would be SAN. With that said, I don't think a vacancy bid of 10-12 CA's would really "shake things up" on a 1,000 pilot list.
KC135 is offline  
Old 03-06-2021, 06:19 AM
  #70  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,215
Default

Originally Posted by Flightaware
Ask anyone who was at the IWA base meeting and they’ll tell you a certain SVP let it slip... it’s a known commodity. I never said what it was but you can find out if you put in the work.
I don't feel like calling everyone I know at IWA, and asking if they went to the meeting. If you know something why not quit playing games and come out with it? You can send me a pm if you're afraid.
Margaritaville is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotAnalyst
Major
65
10-12-2022 05:31 AM
SonicFlyer
Safety
40
06-30-2018 09:54 PM
CL19
Envoy Airlines
63
05-02-2018 09:50 AM
MtnPeakCruiser
ExpressJet
194
12-19-2014 10:03 AM
Redraider217
Regional
106
05-08-2012 08:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices