Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Bailing for greener pastures? >

Bailing for greener pastures?

Search

Notices

Bailing for greener pastures?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2016, 06:25 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: a cushy one with a forward facing window
Posts: 114
Default

With the state of the regional airlines attracting pilots these days, aag must be smoking something good. I can not see how they could attract enough pilots to fly them. SCOPE IS A MUST, the state of the industry may be an even better scope clause. I bet BT and BM are sitting there saying there isn't a pilot shortage as regionals are being forced to pay very close to mainline rates to attract pilots and still can not do it.
busbusbaby is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 09:02 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

It seems though AAG is in part of the country esp with ANC, SEA, and PDX that makes them pretty enviable for a lot of guys simply for the PNW. They are from there/live there/and that would always be their #1. Not sure how it is now but Horizon and Alaska never had any problems getting pilots. Delta has changed the playing field a bit in the PNW with both Compass and DAL having a SEA base which has gone relatively-speaking fairly junior. I'm not sold on the notion that regionals attracting pilots will be a problem in the future, not for a carrier like Horizon.

Scope remains one of the top issues for a lot of people.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 02:31 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by OCCP
Scope basically limits the number of rj airplanes and also seating capacity, protecting mainline jobs and growth.

Most majors have negotiated with their unions to allow a certain number of small jets to be flown by regionals, but anything over 76 (usually) seats needs to be flown by mainline pilots.

Without a good scope clause the mainline company can go buy e190 or c-series and give them to the regionals
Stop saying it that way...or ending that sentence with a full-stop. It makes it a junior/senior issue.

Mainline can...and in my estimation would, outsource 787's.

The only gurantee we get are the 737's that were on order at last DOS.
AltoCumulus is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 06:09 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Right Side Up
Posts: 192
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Not sure how it is now but Horizon and Alaska never had any problems getting pilots.
Horizon recently had to cancel an upgrade class due to staffing issues. They are having problems filling classes.

Alaska is the dream place for a lot of PNWers, but with regionals like Compass and SkyWest having bases in the region (and better pay, QOL, etc.) Horizon isn't very attractive currently. Not to mention you'll be in a pool if you go from QX to AS, whereas coming from anywhere else you'll go right to class.
rmcbear08 is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 06:17 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
Stop saying it that way...or ending that sentence with a full-stop. It makes it a junior/senior issue.



Mainline can...and in my estimation would, outsource 787's.



The only gurantee we get are the 737's that were on order at last DOS.


I'm not sure what you mean about the junior/senior issue.
OCCP is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 09:12 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,286
Default

Is there any scope language at all in the current contract? I thought somewhere I had heard that there was a limit for number of seats in place, but not for how many airframes.

That wrong?
ImperialxRat is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 09:21 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CassinAK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Captain
Posts: 327
Default Bailing for greener pastures?

Originally Posted by ImperialxRat
Is there any scope language at all in the current contract? I thought somewhere I had heard that there was a limit for number of seats in place, but not for how many airframes.



That wrong?


No limit on outsourcing of any kind.... Except the current 737s + (73 orders and options from the 2012 aircraft order).

Word is the TPA hold up we are having with management is over scope. I am glad people are starting open their eyes to the threat.
CassinAK is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 09:32 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CassinAK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Captain
Posts: 327
Default

To add to that currently there are 13 EMBs flying for Alaska. When all the Firm orders arrive there will be 58 plus 30 options. If our pilots don't think that will effect our flying then they really don't give a S___t
CassinAK is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 11:03 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 737 tiller master
Posts: 288
Default

I've read that the E175 sim can support the E190 software, so there is no need to buy separate sims. During the last TA road shows, a union rep was spouting off that scope isn't worth the paper that it's written on! Seriously, ALPA?!
Arctichicken is offline  
Old 10-10-2016, 12:43 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Q400, B-737
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by CassinAK
To add to that currently there are 13 EMBs flying for Alaska. When all the Firm orders arrive there will be 58 plus 30 options. If our pilots don't think that will effect our flying then they really don't give a S___t
They just told QX that now no Q400s will be leaving.
They're sucking it up and paying for D checks. So all the new Embraers will be new flying, most likely starting out out with increased frequency to current AAG cities. Planning on receiving 13 next year, from Apr~Dec, with one per month after that....
N19906 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyPig09
Military
57
10-20-2012 06:30 AM
Check Essential
American
45
10-07-2012 10:18 AM
renman95
Cargo
22
08-15-2012 02:38 PM
Seeburg220
Hangar Talk
1
07-23-2007 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices